The Avengers The Official 'Hulk in Avengers' thread.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Chewy,

How hard to stand behind your sources?
What I was told is very similar to the backstory in Hitfix's piece. That Whedon and Norton had met and were very enthusiastic about it and that Whedon was planning to announce Norton at comic-con after a deal was finalized.

Whether that has since changed, I don't know. Whether someone high up at Marvel or some extenuating circumstances caused a change, I don't know, Whether Hitfix's report is true or not, I don't know. We'll find out in two weeks.
 
I know people from the GA who are still listing Rhodey's recast as a complaint for IM2, which is interesting given the big fans are pretty forgiving of it, myself included. Recasting Edward Norton of all people would only piss everyone off, GA included.

Doing this would also damper the character's image further and attest to the naysayers' claim that Hulk can't be translated to movies, which is ridiculous. Show some confidence with the character. Lord, there's a million reasons why they shouldn't do this.
 
I'm with you. It's still my favorite out of all the Marvel films.

Definitely, Nortons version of Banner in The Incredible Hulk was fantastic, it would be a real shame if he wasn't in The Avengers..
I dont think audiences will ever take to The Hulk if they recast again.
Ed Norton is great in the role.. DON'T LET HIM GO MARVEL!!

(And if you've any say in it keep Nick Cage in GR2 as well!) :woot:
 
Remember last week when the "Josh Hutcherson/Spidey" rumor went so out of control, it prompted Sony to announce Andrew Garfield as Spidey?

Well, what happens if the same thing happens with this rumor?
 
You mean them announcing Norton to mend this? Then we rejoice and high five and laugh and cry with happiness.
 
You mean them announcing Norton to mend this? Then we rejoice and high five and laugh and cry with happiness.

Oh I hope so.....those that believe in prayer need to start praying NOW!
 
teamedface1.jpg

lol

I'm just filing all this under "rumor" until official word is announced. I hope they don't recast.
 
This Comic-Con seems like the time to really unleash the Marvel domination with announcing-

Thor footage
Cap photos/concept art
Joss Whedon as Avengers director
Avengers news- villains, casting, story ideas, etc.
short films
lower budget films
Dr. Strange director
other projects being planned

this could all be tarnished by one very bad casting news article, so don't blow your big year, Marvel. Just sign the ****er and please the world.
 
Replacing Norton would not only be a mistake because of his excellent acting ability, but it would also be one more nail in the coffin for the Hulk.
 
Replacing Norton would not only be a mistake because of his excellent acting ability, but it would also be one more nail in the coffin for the Hulk.

Indeed, :(. Hulk doesn't deserve it....hes such a great character....
 
Indeed, :(. Hulk doesn't deserve it....hes such a great character....
I don't get it either. Norton was a great actor and the producers said that the Incredible Hulk was a great sucess and Norton said he might rejoin the cast so why are choing a different actor. please tell me it's a joke.
 
McWeeny had this to say on Twitter:
Simply put, they're lowballing him. They could make the deal right now. And it sounds like he and Whedon loved each other.
Yep, sounds exactly the same as the SLJ/Rourke situations. And I'd be surprised if it didn't end similarly. Especially since Norton clearly has the fans on his side
 
McWeeny had this to say on Twitter:Yep, sounds exactly the same as the SLJ/Rourke situations. And I'd be surprised if it didn't end similarly. Especially since Norton clearly has the fans on his side

Watch it, hoss, if you aren't fanning your hands about with worry like a teenage girl before her first date you aren't doing it properly. Optimism and logical thought are not allowed.
 
"We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title role of Bruce Banner in the Avengers. Our decision is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our other talented cast members. The Avengers demands players who thrive working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the iconic role in the coming weeks."

:csad::csad::csad::csad::csad::csad::csad::csad:
 
Suck my **** Marvel cause I ain't sucking yours anymore.
 
A "name actor"? Which talented name actor would step in? I'd seriously lol if it was Bana but Hollywood's not that big of a place and doing so could be seen as a tremendous F-U to Norton. Honestly, I'm embarrassed for Marvel. They're not conducting themselves well here at all, and unless Norton pulled some really bad stuff that we just don't know about, this is unnecessary and foolish.
 
F*** Kevin Feige, dudes a straight up moron. He always seemed like a *****ey little b***, this confirms it.
 
who knows maybe they are trying for johnny depp or something. anyway i still think putting the hulk only is better. dont need banner. maybe for quick little setup, but just have the hulk that can talk. dont be scared of cg acting hulk.
 
who knows maybe they are trying for johnny depp or something. anyway i still think putting the hulk only is better. dont need banner. maybe for quick little setup, but just have the hulk that can talk. dont be scared of cg acting hulk.

B.S. that you don't need Banner.

F- this decision.

I'm jumping ship, Batman 3 better be the #1 movie in 2012 and I hope this tanks.
 
By the sounds of that statement, Norton wasn't being a team player.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,420
Messages
22,101,515
Members
45,896
Latest member
Bob999
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"