TheIrishAvenger
You are not special.
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 6,888
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Here's the music that was used in the trailer!
Well, what's great about sequels is that you already know each character, you know their weakness, you can explore more things that you don't usually get to do with superheroes (Batman being an exception, and perhaps Spider-Man, up to movie #2).
But the MCU is bringing a whole new set of stories to tell from the comic book universe, specially now in Phase 2, where you know the hero acknowledges he is part of a bigger superhero group. To me, it feels like a different era in the superhero movie genre. And I'm glad they're trying, at least for what the teaser shows, that they're trying something different and more challenging for everyone involved. It's gonna be great to see how Phase 2 unfolds, and how they're going to raise the stakes, both in terms of action and storytelling, expanding the mythology of every character.
I honestly don't see the numerous comparisons people are levying at IM3 and TDKR. Aside from a few superficial similarities (part takes place during the winter, third film in an franchise), it looks like a whole different beast.
The trailer is really good, and I'm digging John Toll's amazing camerawork here. And it feels like a tonally different movie than the previous two IM pics.
Even though Iron Man 2 didn't quite reach the heights of its predecessor, it looks to me that it did its job in painting the big picture for the Marvel Universe and the Iron Man trilogy. Maybe the second film being the "lighter" (or "weaker") movie will work in Iron Man 3's favor ... Big time.
I watched Iron Man 2 recently, and I honestly do NOT think it's a terrible movie. In fact, I quite enjoy the film thoroughly, and I think it holds up pretty well. Granted, it's more of a lighthearted action movie, but if Iron Man 3 blows people away with its promising heavy material, then I think Iron Man 2 served its purpose. IM2 established that Tony was part of a bigger universe, which was a perfect stepping stone for Phase 1 of the Avengers movies. Also, perhaps it's a great thing for the sake of the Iron Man Trilogy that Marvel didn't play their ace cards for the second movie, potentially setting themselves up for failure in the third movie?
Anyway, I'm going to go out and say this now: If Iron Man 3 ends up being on par or better than the first Iron Man, then I'm going to title the Iron Man films as the best superhero trilogy to date.
I just have a feeling that it was Marvel's intention for IM2 to not pack an emotional or deep punch. The movie gave Tony a little story that ended on a really high note for him, and then ... The Avengers movie happened to him. And now Iron Man 3 is happening to him. Harsh reality is hitting Tony hard now, and that's the thing that's going to work in the third installment's favor, I think. I think that's going to give the movie more emotional weight, since we as the audience aren't used to seeing Tony so broken.
I enjoy Iron Man 2 quite a bit because it's the first time we see Iron Man really in action. In the first film Iron Man didn't have all that much to do.
Absolutely love it so far. They needed to raise the stakes and boy did they! This was the mistake that Nolan made with putting the joker in the 2nd movie, because everything else was going to be a letdown, but in this as much flack as they got for IM2 they saved the best for last.
Granted there's alot of work still to be done, but they are making this movie a serious introspective on Tony and being Iron Man and having his identity known to everyone.
So awesome that he shows his vulnerability to the one person who knows him best, which makes his false bravado somewhat of a mask.
Mandarin is the main villian here, and likely Killian is working for him, but they made Mandarin a real threat, and now all the build up of the 10 rings stuff from the previous films pays off.
Seeing Tony go into surgury, clearly Extremis is somesort of nano tech that will truely make Tony and the suit one and the same.
Clearly this is THE superhero movie of 2013.
I enjoy Iron Man 2 quite a bit because it's the first time we see Iron Man really in action. In the first film Iron Man didn't have all that much to do.
I think the darker tone, the fall of the hero so completely and the shot of Pepper holding the damaged Iron Man mask remind people of some of the points of TDKR.
That's Tony's personality, though. He plays it off like a joke in front of people, but he's only talking to Pepper this time.
The guy nearly died several times during The Avengers. And without the suit, he's the most vulnerable of the big 4.
I was disappointed with that. The Mark 3 comes in around 1 hour and 9 minute.
By the time of 1 hour and 19 minutes it's done and Rhodey is giving his speech
We don't see Iron Man till probably 1 hour and 46 minutes
That was it for the Mark 3
Iron Man 2
-No combat scenes with the Mark 4
-Two minutes of Mark 5 action
-Mark 6 dodging drones
-A couple of minutes with the Mark 6 and War Machine
-One to two minutes with Whiplash
Avengers had more Iron Man action than both movies combined it seems
The dark tone and fall of the hero are generic enough to fit tons of movies. The cracked mask mean two completely different things in TDKR and IM3. And as for the snow and winter some people bring up, that's because it's been a "motif" of Shane Black for decades....it's no secret that he sets nearly all of his movies at Christmas time.
Tony is also supposed to retire with Pepper, while JGL becomes the new Iron Man.I think the darker tone, the fall of the hero so completely and the shot of Pepper holding the damaged Iron Man mask remind people of some of the points of TDKR.
Tony is also supposed to retire with Pepper, while JGL becomes the new Iron Man.
All of those things in one trailer are bound to evoke a lazy comparison from people only viewing the trailer as casual fans.
I really liked the scene of Howard's projection speaking to Tony. Very cinematic.I do think IM2 had some nice personal moments.