The Squirrel
Le Rongeur
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2003
- Messages
- 17,781
- Reaction score
- 19
- Points
- 58
She'd be good too.
Last edited:
For someone who considers himself to have sources, for all I know he could be the one called 'Hollywood Insider' for the site. But yes I could be wrong as well.Why would he take offense if you didn't believe a list contained in an article he didn't even write...
That's what happens when you report or "hint" to things and put a lot of stock into it. It's why Jett is an unbelievable source now, Jett's been wrong too many times about the Batman movies by Nolan that he lost what little credibility he had.So because he was "wrong" about Cavill, the articles he posts from other websites are somehow tainted. That's a horse of a different color.
What the?
For someone who considers himself to have sources, for all I know he could be the one called 'Hollywood Insider' for the site. But yes I could be wrong as well.
That's what happens when you report or "hint" to things and put a lot of stock into it. It's why Jett is an unbelievable source now, Jett's been wrong too many times about the Batman movies by Nolan that he lost what little credibility he had.
Especially for one who's first inside hint has been an actor(who's now official) being out of the running for a small rumor. As for if he's been right about other hints, I haven't heard or read any of them and he wouldn't provide any examples.
So yes, his credibility is pretty shot for me, and I'm sure some others who remember.
For someone who considers himself to have sources, for all I know he could be the one called 'Hollywood Insider' for the site. But yes I could be wrong as well.
That's what happens when you report or "hint" to things and put a lot of stock into it. It's why Jett is an unbelievable source now, Jett's been wrong too many times about the Batman movies by Nolan that he lost what little credibility he had.
Especially for one who's first inside hint has been an actor(who's now official) being out of the running for a small rumor. As for if he's been right about other hints, I haven't heard or read any of them and he wouldn't provide any examples.
So yes, his credibility is pretty shot for me, and I'm sure some others who remember.
And I often see people believing a story they read on a "trusted" website instead of what the people making the film say straight from their lips.
Oh, and PS: It's perfectly all right to just say you don't think someone looks right for a part. You don't have to say laughable stuff about these women being disgusting, or horse-faced, or whatever. We all know you wouldn't kick a single one of them out of bed, so stop trying to look like a cyberpimp.
Kristen Stewart
I'm not talking about a creative team lying. And I'm not saying that they never do lie.Well, you were doing well with your argument up until that last line. People making films lie all the time, on every level. Whether it be to protect their investment or protect their interests. You can't take a lot of what the creative team says about a film at face value, you always have to investigate it. There are so many examples of this I don't know where to begin.
McAdams is the only acceptable one on that list. Biel, if I absolutely had to choose a second.
You'd also think Snyder would cast somebody for this movie.
Amber Heard is HOT, but to be honest she strikes me as being too sleezy.
Amber Heard is HOT, but to be honest she strikes me as being too sleezy.
would WB even think of her.And not that great acting-wise, honestly.
Plus, if people are going to make a big deal about a British Superman, I can only imagine the remarks about a lesbian playing Lois Lane.