Jake Cassidy
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2007
- Messages
- 18,237
- Reaction score
- 137
- Points
- 73
You're always so over dramatic. Holy...
Shannon's performance will be legendary.
Barney? Is that you?
You're always so over dramatic. Holy...
Shannon's performance will be legendary.
You mean, as earlier speculated by reports that also included information already proven incorrect.
It's pretty amazing that every person cast so far minus Cavill has been nominated for an Oscar at one point. Excellent casting so far IMO. I think Shannon could steal the show.
thanks for answering my question...do you understand that we want a new vilalin that was not used in previous movies? do you understand that in 2011 we have technology for every villain from the comcis?![]()
I wouldn't count out Brainiac just yet. I'll bet the farm we get two or three villains.
We could easily see Zod, Brainiac, and Metallo along with Lex.
She's meh.Hopefully Diane Kruger denying her potential involvement was a lie too.
You mean like was done with B.B.?I say a cold no to this. Unless Brainiac is connected to the Krypton's fate like TAS maybe at least introduce him. Going that far is using all the great villains in one movie. Don't waste them all included with an origin story. Spread it out. This one should focus on Superman himself, not his villians. The origin story should always focus primarily on the hero. And doing so you would not get a very fleshed out Brainiac or Metallo.
if only now SHH members would understand that actors,directors and producers lie![]()
this is their last chance to bring him back IMO. they should not be thinking about sequels. this needs to be the best sueprman movie .thanks for answering my question...
...yes, i understand that we ALL want to see a villain that hasn't been used in the movies yet and i certainly understand that, in this day and age of ultrarealistic CGI, most of the villains from Superman's rogues gallery can be brought to life. however, that doesn't necessarily mean they SHOULD...especially in an origin movie. do we really want to see Doomsday in an origin film???
You mean like was done with B.B.?
this is their last chance to bring him back IMO. they should not be thinking about sequels. this needs to be the best sueprman movie .
now i've got to ask those who dislike the idea of Zod in this movie, do YOU understand that?
You're always so over dramatic. Holy...
Shannon's performance will be legendary.
... but how am I always over dramatic? This is the first bit of news that I haven't praised... 
precisely...good post.I think as Dorky and others said, I think too many have Zod from Donner's films stuck in their heads.
I'm stoked to see where they go. Since this is a re-invention we are going to have another origin story. I don't want to see Brainiac or Metallo shoved into an origin story just so we could have them. I'd rather the sequels have them where they can be fleshed out.
you also need to take into consideration the story they're trying to tell. if they SOLELY thinking about how this is their last chance and they need to pack as much in as they possibly can then it would become overkill and saturated with too much from the Superman mythos. seems to me they're trying to tell Superman's origins the best way possible and not worrying about the effect any post or possible future movies will have on this one. there will be plenty of action, plenty of eye candy...EVEN IF Zod is the main villain.this is their last chance to bring him back IMO. they should not be thinking about sequels. this needs to be the best sueprman movie .
And we thought nothing could top the Amy Adams thread.![]()

Nobody's made a comment about Michael Shannon's age or physical appearance yet.![]()
I have. At 35, I'm worried he might die of old age during filming.
may i ask why so? why do you dislike him as a villain in general? have you read all the comic and seen the tv Zods?I don't dislike Zod because of the old movies... I just dislike him as a villain in general, especially for this reboot.
Nobody's made a comment about Michael Shannon's age or physical appearance yet.![]()
t:

I think what alot of us are fearing is that this could be the last superman film for a long time if things arent resolved with the families. It should get resolved, but there are no guarantees. If its not, then we wont get the villains we want onscreen for a long time.Those were not big villains though. Using Brainiac and Metallo is like using Joker and Two-Face and Ra's and Scarecrow and Falcone all in one film on top of the origin story. You could make it work but the Brainiac and Metallo would be shallow and not to their full potential.
Yea put in some minor villains maybe (remember Lex will probably still be in this) We have to introduce so many characters in this and Superman's past.
Yea you COULD put those guys in and make it work, but they would be not as strong as if they were at least in another movie (Metallo and Brainiac in the second one or something) But putting all of these heavy hitters in an origin story would just take away everything from Supes rouges and people would not be as wowed possibly with the sequels.
may i ask why so? why do you dislike him as a villain in general? have you read all the comic and seen the tv Zods?
what, specifically about Zod, is it that you don't like? because i think he's actually a great villain. he comes from Krypton so he knows the culture, the history, the MILITARY TACTICS, the technology, the advanced way of thinking and especially HIS PARENTS......combine that with Superman's powers and you have a formidable villain for Superman to face for his first great challenge.