As far as movies go...because audiences enjoy the scope and impact of Super-action and heroism they're watching in front of them. You can preach and extoll his character until the cows come home, but if it's still going to end up being the same ol' Superman again....
That's why I felt they should start with Superman's introduction to the world as a mysterious phenomenon, then let our insight into his past/character unfold as we go along. Let the audience know right off the bat that this isn't the same ol' Superman, and then they'll be that much more interested and invested in finding out more about him....rather than having to sit through his walk down memory lane for 20 minutes before getting to the good stuff.
The key difference should be that becoming Superman is his choice, not some pre-ordained destiny or what have you. It should reflect more on Jon and Marta Kent's upbringing of him, not a genetic disposition or some otherworldly heritage that he never experienced. So no more floating Jor-El ghost and all.
I agree to a point on this. His real enemy and "final battle" was against a big piece of land. I like the movie as I like most Superman things but that part was incredibly underwhelming.
That should be an interesting performance. Well, that was quick. Shannon goes for a full 3 minutes talking about Superman:
i wonder if Michael Shannon did an audition with Henry Cavill. they NEED to have chemistry!!!
another parody of an Amy Adams complaint
Here's the video of Shannon telling his story about his audition with Zack and Henry. It's very funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx8MPa3fECA&feature=player_embedded#at=146
"It's like I'm on acid".
That should be an interesting performance.
This is the first time I hear Michael Shannon as himself. He's got an interesting accent. Any way, he sounds like a regular guy but I like that. The ones who play really intense roles always seem to be kind of chill in real life.
Here's the video of Shannon telling his story about his audition with Zack and Henry. It's very funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx8MPa3fECA&feature=player_embedded#at=146
Zod will not be the only villain in this movie (and I am not referring to Luthor or the other Kyrptonian villains.)
Heh, that is a great story.Here's the video of Shannon telling his story about his audition with Zack and Henry. It's very funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx8MPa3fECA&feature=player_embedded#at=146
"start the scene where you're a lil' bit nicer!" hehe
if Snyder actually requested something like that it makes me thing that Zod isn't going to be as obviously villainous as he was played by Stamp. that's a good thing...
"start the scene where you're a lil' bit nicer!" hehe
if Snyder actually requested something like that it makes me thing that Zod isn't going to be as obviously villainous as he was played by Stamp. that's a good thing...
![]()
Hmmmmm Im torn...
Here's the video of Shannon telling his story about his audition with Zack and Henry. It's very funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx8MPa3fECA&feature=player_embedded#at=146

Is it me, or does a the possible storyline we could be getting in Man of Steel sound sort of like what Mike Dougherty wanted to do with a Superman Returns sequel?
http://www.moviehole.net/201033129-what-would-doughertys-superman-sequel-have-been
You're a Kryptonian!Why is Zod not affected by Kryptonite? He's a Kryptonian!
Just imagine seing Cavill in a supermodernized suit looking all 2012-like and then hearing Williams' joyful 70's theme on top. The theme would be so malplaced it's not even funny and it would just ridicule itself completely. No thanx to that scenario. The theme was also buried with Reeve IMO.