ChrisBaleBatman said:
Wait.....they LOST a baby? How long ago......b/c, honestly....reading that preview (and yeah, it was cool) you wouldn't know. Pfttt, I didn't.
It was during REVELATIONS in the Spider-books where Ben Reilly was
a). Revealed, definitively, to be the clone (and NOT the "real" Peter Parker, undoing a very unpopular retcon)
b). Killed by a very-much-alive Norman Osborn, who returned after 20+ years in real time to claim that his Gobby steroids gave him a "healing factor" and he's been a quiet mastermind of the whole clone mess for a while. In retaliation, Spidey threw Gobby off a building with a sack full of his pumpkin bombs in an attempt to murder him, but Norman's since returned and pretty much been responsible for every hardship that Peter has ever faced since, from banging Gwen in college to putting his name on junk mail lists.
This would have been around 1996. During that story, MJ's water broke during Peter & Ben's fight with Gaunt, and she gave birth without them around. A doctor under the employ of Osborn whisked the baby elsewhere while telling MJ that it was "stillborn". Ever since, especially since the period after the Clone Saga was no bed of roses under Howard Mackie either, this plotline has faded into nothingness. The last plotline I recalled was Kaine attempting to chase down some "mysterious package" that Goblin's agents had, which was presumably that lost child. But ever since, it's been left to the dust-bins of fansites and message boards. The entire Clone Saga and whatever happened a year or two before or after is pretty much "ixnay" at Marvel, aside for occasional jokey references as "Don't get me started about clones", where you'd have gotten the impression that Spidey never cared for Ben Reilly, when in fact he saw him as a "surrogate brother" by the end.
In another reality, MC2, this baby is alive and well and becomes Spider-Girl.
This is not the first instance of Marvel distancing itself from continuity it doesn't like for a given character. Most X-people are obliged to remember that Cyclops essentially ABANDONED a wife and son in Alaska once Jean Grey came back from the dead to from X-FACTOR; fortunately, a demonic posession and a techno-organic virus helped eliminate this very problematic storyline from "tainting" Cyclops' moral character. But a better example would be from the FANTASTIC FOUR stories of the mid 90's before ONSLAUGHT, especially Johnny Storm's marriage to a woman he thought was Alicia Masters, who turned out to be a Skrull, Lyja Laserfist. Johnny was married faithfully to "Alicia" for years in real time before the reveal, and afterwards it was a heartbreaking sort of thing that got muddled (as Lyja still had some feelings for Johnny). Flip through more recent F4 comics, though, and you'd think Johnny had never been in a committed relationship before (let alone once MARRIED). Reed, Sue, and Ben even KID Johnny about his inability to settle down, which means that Marvel's considered this long-running story "ixnay", or, the Richards' are insensitive bastards and Johnny has selective amnesia. Take your pick.
Do I like all of these past storylines? No. But pretending they don't exist can rob characters of some emotions and reactions that could prove interesting, and retconning all EXISTANCE AND REACTION from a past story tells a current fan that stories don't matter, because at any moment they can be erased and omitted from mythos. Hence one reason why DEADLY GENESIS, at least in the eyes of Joe Q, is "underperforming" (because it is selling in the Top 15 each month instead of, presumably, the Top 10).