StylishHokie21
Sidekick
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2003
- Messages
- 4,965
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
X-men 3 tried to cram even more in a 95 minute running time.
The movie was trash.
Agreed! It's a shame that they couldn't wait for Singer. Thank god Sony isn't Fox.
X-men 3 tried to cram even more in a 95 minute running time.
The movie was trash.
Yeah IMDB or who ever was saying 2 hours 36 min., 156 minutes. Which is most likely the running time at most theaters with the pre-show, trailers, etc.
2 hours 20 minutes is most likely the actual running time of the film.
X-men 3 tried to cram even more in a 95 minute running time.
The movie was trash.

UPDATE
The official running time according to the British Board of Film Classification is approximately 139 minutes.![]()
Source Link: http://www.bbfc.co.uk/website/Class...765e26c1f7ddfb37802572c00056c055?OpenDocument
156 would be nice but not likely
There is NO WAY! The film is the same ALL OVER!Maybe the US run-time is longer than the British run-time.

Well if you compare SM3 and SR in terms of action sequences...the more the better. At least Spidey will be fighting someone...and not a giant island. Bring on the action scenes!Well, two and a half hours of Spidey is not the same as two and a half hours of Supes. Supes had, what, 3 "fight" scenes? Spidey has something like 7 major action scenes. Not saying action makes a movie good, I'm just sayin...
t:On DVD the PAL release of the film will be 4% shorter than the Region 1 version (well technically the NTSC version).
The picture quality on the PAL version will be better too, such is the vagaries of putting a 24 fps format into 50Hz and 60Hz.
Who cares? We'll be getting a Blu-Ray version when it comes out anyway.