PumpkinBombxXx
Click Click Boom
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 256
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Nathan Fillion all the way as Giant Man. Hes even worked with Joss
My problem with the Edger Wright ant man movie is its about Scott Lang and not hank Pym.Agreed, i'm not a reader of Ant-Man, all i know is from wikipedia and The Ultimates but his movie is the one i'm most looking forward after the avengers, why? Because of the director and because his ideas can make one of the best comic book movies ever.
But i would say put Avengers on 2016 or later so that they can make movies with other characters we didn't see yet
Agreed, i'm not a reader of Ant-Man, all i know is from wikipedia and The Ultimates but his movie is the one i'm most looking forward after the avengers, why? Because of the director and because his ideas can make one of the best comic book movies ever.
But i would say put Avengers on 2016 or later so that they can make movies with other characters we didn't see yet
nevahPut down that weed.
My problem with the Edger Wright ant man movie is its about Scott Lang and not hank Pym.
I love Hank Pym i hate how the comics focus so much on him hitting his wife. I dont think there is ever an excuse to hit a woman let alone ur wife but cheese and rice lets move on the man is a hero and a good person (as far as fictional characters go anyway)
so only a spy knows what they are looking for???? This is the dumbest thing I have heard of.
Cap: "Antman we need you to sneak into the base and collect data for us."
Antman: "On it"
2 hours later Antman comes out
Antman:"What was I supposed to look for?"
Sure a scientist whose job is to observe and interpret things would never make a good spy
Exactly, because it took a 2hr movie to develop it into something serious, not because they shoehorned it into a team up movie.So what you are saying is that it would be groundbreaking and new to have a giant superhero....im sure we could all think of something that was looked at as silly that when taken seriously became a huge hit.
Hawkeye's a sniper. He has the training, equipment and costume in order to line up a crucial shot while not being noticed. Cap and Thor don't have that. Black Widow has the advantage on espionage, because espionage is more than just 'avoid detection,' and she's been doing it longer and on a higher level. Movie Banner never avoided SHIELD, for instance.As much as I love Hawkeye and Blackwidow...on this team they dont bring anything to the table that any of the other members can.
Hawkeye shoots arrows...Cap throws a shield that returns to his hands, Thor throws a hammer that returns to his hands
Black widow espionage and martial arts....I'd say Bruce has the advantage on espionage since he avoided both Shield and Army Intelligence for several years....which are you gonna notice first....the hot red head or the unremarkable guy
Yes it is, that's why he wont be in avengersMy problem with the Edgar Wright movie is that it's not in continuity with the Avengers, it's its own separate thing.
Yeah, I'm thinking the movie may now be about a modern Hank Pym again, it'd be much cooler than Scott Lang.
Straw man arguements aside, either spies are trained, or they're not. If they're trained, being able to simulate part of their training (sneaking in) doesn't make up for the other parts of their training: gathering information that's not obvious, providing false information, hacking, etc. Are you saying Hawkeye and Black Widow aren't trained intelligence operatives?
How hard is it to gather information???? Pepper did it in IM...she's not a spy..with equipment from Tony who is not a spy himself.
What False information needs to be given? The guy is the size of an ant. You'd have to be looking for an ant sized man to find him.
Hacking??? Only spies hack??? Ask Sony of thats the case with their PSN....Newscorp reporters were hacking people's phones...are they spies???
Don't bet on a movie as safe as captain america, this one will probably take much more risks, and stop calling MFU, it's MCU: Marvel cinematic universeI'd be willing to bet on it.
The movie should've been about Hank (and Janet) all along instead of Lang; I'm sure that all the rewrites are coming from Marvel steering Wright towards an MFU-friendly story.
Don't bet on a movie as safe as captain america, this one will probably take much more risks, and stop calling MFU, it's MCU: Marvel cinematic universe
Don't bet on a movie as safe as captain america, this one will probably take much more risks, and stop calling MFU, it's MCU: Marvel cinematic universe
I had a dream about this, although Pym had a weird gold helmet.If not an in-movie cameo, I wonder if we could get an Ant-Man tease as a post-credit scene for Avengers. They usually shoot those pretty late in the filming, and typically by the director that's shooting the upcoming movie. Wright and Marvel have more than enough time to make that happen.