The Dark Knight The Riddler/Nygma Thread

[Agentsands77]

Well, maybe. But we don't know for sure that the Riddler's actually in this thing.

 

[Two-Face]

Who said Riddler was in TDK in the first place?

 

[The Mighty Wind]

I think some people would probably appreciate a change in thread title at the very least. This'll end up showing up on the Batman forums menu.

 

[JTIZZLEVILLE]

Whether or not it goes against the policy, it is a misleading title and the thread should be closed.

 

[BubbaGump]

Maybe Nigma will be striking a deal with Wayne Enterprises for a new line of puzzle or something and he realizes that...

Spoiler

...Bruce Wayne is Batman!

 

[lordofthenerds]

Is this thread title considered a infringement of the new spoiler policy?

It's just as much an infringement of the policy as the "Iconic Riddler Imagery" thread is. It just indicates the Riddler will be in the movie.

 

[FCEEVIPER]

I'm just wondering guys. :\

 

[The Mighty Wind]

With Eric Roberts saying that a lot of his role is "We have to get rid of this bat-guy" I'm thinking that the Riddler is a mob-intelligence officer of some sort like in the Long Hallowe'en, commissioned by Maroni to try and find out who Batman is and take him down.

Although that's a complete shot in the dark and doesn't explain why AMH is saying he shoots scenes with Morgan Freeman.

 

[BubbaGump]

It's just as much an infringement of the policy as the "Iconic Riddler Imagery" thread is. It just indicates the Riddler will be in the movie.

Tru dat.

 

[Mysterio]

If what we are hearing is true and farmer Ted is playing the Riddler. How do you think this is going to work in the plot. Does anyone see him as an associate with the Joker, Two-Face, or Scarecrow? Or is he on his own and just merly introduced ala Dr. Conners. How much screen time do you think he will have? Post some ideas and thoughts.

1) there are multiple threads about this topic, and,
2) there is nothing of substance that supports Riddler being in the movie.

 

[fletch1076]

Does that give everyone peace of mind?

 

[donk70]

I'm not opposed to Nygma being in the movie.

I'm not opposed to AMH being in the movie


What I am opposed to is AMH portraying Nygma.

 

[Mysterio]

Is this thread title considered a infringement of the new spoiler policy?

i don't see how it could since no one knows if Riddler is even in the movie.

 

[strider]

With Eric Roberts saying that a lot of his role is "We have to get rid of this bat-guy" I'm thinking that the Riddler is a mob-intelligence officer of some sort like in the Long Hallowe'en, commissioned by Maroni to try and find out who Batman is and take him down.

Although that's a complete shot in the dark and doesn't explain why AMH is saying he shoots scenes with Morgan Freeman.

Good post. I wouldn't object at all if this is the form Nolan would carry out the Riddler. I like the Riddler and all that jazz but I just don't have any room for him in these flims. And thats to bad, he's a decent villain if portrayed right.

 

[BubbaGump]

Although that's a complete shot in the dark and doesn't explain why AMH is saying he shoots scenes with Morgan Freeman.

He's probably striking up a deal with Wayne Enterprises for a product.

 

[Yurka]

he should be chased by Batman and pushed off a building to his death

 

[Shoemeister]

Is this thread title considered a infringement of the new spoiler policy?

LOL... this is already so beyond absurd.

 

[Mysterio]

LOL... this is already so beyond absurd.

now that is truly a slippery slope.

 

[wd golf39]

nygma will work at wayne enterprises like in forever but he wont be the crazy guy in TDK, the 3rd movie he will become the riddler.

 

[Shoemeister]

now that is truly a slippery slope.

I know. I scraped my elbow.

 

[Katsuro]

i don't see how it could since no one knows if Riddler is even in the movie.

But the thread title implies we do. People might glance over the title and see it. They wont want to ruin things further by reading the thread itself, thus will never see that it's just speculation.

 

[Shoemeister]

So what are we supposed to use as titles?

"ACTOR PLAYING CHARACTER IN TDK!"

OOOO WOW! I can't wait to see all 50 of those threads. It's the Spoiler forum. What do you EXPECT?!?!?!?!

 

[Mysterio]

But the thread title implies we do. People might glance over the title and see it. They wont want to ruin things further by reading the thread itself, thus will never see that it's just speculation.

i don't see the problem. can a spoiler be a spoiler if it's nothing but speculation by a poster that is then emailed to someone's blog that in turn posts it as "rumor says..."? there sure seems to be a lot of hand holding going on.

 

[Katsuro]

i don't see the problem. can a spoiler be a spoiler if it's nothing but speculation by a poster that is then emailed to someone's blog that in turn posts it as "rumor says..."? there sure seems to be a lot of hand holding going on.

Who's talking about emails and blogs? I'm talking about this thread title, that implies that Riddler is in the next movie. Sure, we're guessing, but the title doesn't say that. The title makes it sound like fact. So if it ends up being true, how is it any different than if we knew it was true?

 

[strikezone89]

im highly doubting were going to see riddler just yet. but probably Mr.E