twylight said:
*ouch*
We aren't
that organized..we keep the roster and that's about it...we aren't leading the stories at all.
Also I think he was used to more structure, meaning the fights went on for day's giving everyone a turn to post.
Offended again

? I thought for sure that I was complimenting your's and the other GMs' efforts, more or less. Even though I gladly quit my GM duties, I must admit that the game is a model of efficiency when it comes to how well it's kept. But there are times when there's too much efficiency in the gameplay.
We're so organized in the gameplay that my permission seemed to be needed before anyone even attempted to do anything to the Parasite in the Fortress of Solitude. The way that things should be played in fights are to RP your own character's actions, and then let the recipient of those actions decide how it effects their character, or if their character is even effected at all, especially if the recipient of the action is perfectly capable of negating the effects of the first player's actions in some way.
For instance (purely hypothetical situation in no way based on our players), if Batman and the Flash fought, and the person playing Batman threw a batarang at the Flash, then Batman's RPer should not write in his post that his batarang hit the Flash and caused damage unless it was priorly discussed between the 2 players. He should let the Flash's RPer decide what happens with the 'rang in relation to his character. Perhaps Flash merely dodges it, or maybe he plucks it out of the air and finds a way to use it as a weapon. The point is that it should be the Flash's choice in how it effects him. Hopefully it would be in a responsible way that doesn't dumb down Batman's capabilities but still keeping in line with what Flash's superspeed enables him to do. Once again, a purely hypothetical scenario.
Gameplay such as that should be routine during fights, but it doesn't seem to be. During such fights as the FOS battle, the battle in Metropolis, and a couple other instances, I received a number of PMs asking if it would be okay to do [insert indiscriminate verb] to the Parasite. And there were other times, when an action actually
changed the plotline, where I wasn't asked about it at all, forcing me to grit me teeth and run with an uncharacteristic speech or (lack of) action.
Now, if it were something that would change the course of the planned plot entirely, then yes, permission should be asked, but if it's something that commonsense would dictate the Parasite would be able to shrug off, then no permission should be needed. If Rudy has WW's invulnerability and Jay Garrick's speed, then commonsense would signify that you shouldn't need my permission before trying to poison Rudy, shoot him, etc, unless it's a complete K.O. hit.
And even if you do write something that you thought was a seemingly minor action, but the recipient has a problem with it and asks you to take it back, then it shouldn't be much of a hassle to make appropriate edits.
That's what I meant by too organized. Constant asking for permission when it's concerning very trivial actions (should you ask Superman's permission before shooting regular bullets at him? No). There are some things that just don't require permission, but if it's something that will change the plot entirely, then permission should definitely be asked, or if it's too late and you've already posted your actions, then it's not too much trouble to edit.