SuperFerret
King of the Urban Jungle
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Messages
- 33,639
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 58
Why is there such a rush to kick people off the roster? Sure, once in a while someone points out a couple updates that need to be made to the roster, but this is just getting unnecessarily trigger-happy with the EDIT function, IMO. It's never come across as a problem or anything in the past; why give it such strict guidelines now? Of course, if it's concerning a main character that's needed for an important storyline to continue, like Batman or Superman in most cases, and their players don't respond to PMs within a reasonable time limit, than new players should be sought out.
But if it's only concerning the Atomic Skull, the Joker, Eiling, or someone else who's not really involved with the current grand plot, and instead just taking their time doing their own self-contained arc, than there shouldn't be such a rush to have them kicked off the island.
BTW...
Then it would be a double standard.
We can't expect one set of rules for one person's character and then another set of rules for another character.
We're hardly edit-happy. We're just keeping the players updated with those who have fallen behind. It makes it much easier than sending out PM's to each induvidual.
Red X is added to the roster.
Spike's right. It should be dependant on the character that disappears. When I was Superman, there was a time during the DA arc that I didn't post much, and it completely strained the suspended disbelief factor in the situation, as well as probably hold up the stories of others.
The Atomic Skull on the other hand, is/was not in an arc that others depended on, nor is/was he a character that is sought after by other posters. Thus, there is NO ONE getting upset by his absence.
That's where you draw the line. Who's affected by it? If it's nobody, then who cares?

.
