seeing this again ....this is camp.spread the gif
![]()

See thats it, he has his hair down and his emo? wow
i personal hate the idea of amovie having camp moments and serious drama. that just doesnt go togetherThere were alot of camp moments, I don't think Raimi or anyone else is pretending otherwise, however Raimi was able to outweigh any serious camp with some examples of compelling drama and serious action. That's what makes Spiderman 3 different from Schumachers Batman

Surely, he's not a punk.. come on, it's just a way to call him...
i personal hate the idea of amovie having camp moments and serious drama. that just doesnt go together![]()
i never saw a serious comic movie that had campy scenes.I don't think you should be watching a comic book movie than, the whole genre is based on campy ideas.
i never saw a serious comic movie that had campy scenes.
not to me. campy is for me extreme dumb humor.all the spiderman films have had campy scenes in them
![]()
not to me. campy is for me extreme dumb humor.
not to me. campy is for me extreme dumb humor.
look the humor worked to me in spidey 1 and 2. in 3 it was over the top.you thought spidey working out what made his webbing go in the first film was smart humour?
what about spidey falling off a building in the second film, or the raindrops scene or not being allowed into the play because his shoes were untied.
or having students hit him on the head with a bag continuously because he's dropped some books.
they are all in the same league
there is no difference between them.look the humor worked to me in spidey 1 and 2. in 3 it was over the top.
it's probably some of the most accurate character portrayals of spidey i've seen in the entire franchise.
t:
t:
t:why would i do this?there is no difference between them.
If you're consistently picking holes in things throughout the franchise, then it's one thing but to isolate one particular scene in a film when similar scenes have been shown previously is just being...somewhat naiive and incredibly selective.
It just seems to me you're looking for reasons not to like this film.
The reason the scene was shot like that wasn't for comedic effect but was to make pete come across as an ass, we see him as the rest of the public sees him, first a lil charming then obnoxious.
the whole point you don't like it is a just a stretch off the goal of the scene making you not want to like pete, you've just taken it a lil bit too far and have viewed it from outside the box as a scene flaw instead of inside the box as a new symbiote based character flaw of peter parker.
The reason it wasn't done subtlely is because at the be all and end all, it's a children's film and some points need to be smashed home for the younger viewers.

I was the only one who yelled that!
Flash then Harry then Jameson then Pete then back to Harry again wtf??
why would i do this?![]()
because you didn't enjoy it and you wish to validate your opinion.why would i do this?![]()
The people at my screening wouldn't shut up over this...yelling "****" and "****e"...not the kind of reactions I wanted from this movie...but they happened...WTF ever!