Metallo
Evil Dead Re-Animator
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
- Messages
- 11,908
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Originally Posted by Antman
A wrestling legend is measured by the respect he gets from wrestling fans and peers as well as big moments and accomplishments. You look at Punks body of work and he definitely has a case. Curt Hennig, Rick Rude, Jake Roberst and countless others are considered legends despite being midcard/upper midcard Jericho is a main event jobber of sorts yet he's still a legend. He's been booked just as badly as Punk during his career.
As far as Punks peers and elders he has the respect of many of them. Some of them true legends and icons in their own right. Thats a huge sign of how talented Punk is. He will be looked at as a great star down the road. I think the point that he could be seen as even better if he had the right support is a fair one though.
He'd be creating far more epic moments if he had guys like Roberts, Piper, Hennig, Savage, Michaels, Flair, Hogan, Austin, Bret Hart, Steamboat, Terry Funk, etc. in their primes to work with.
WWE isn't really trying to bring in or properly cultivate talent like that. Even Punk only made it because he forced their hand. Not because they gave him a fair chance. Thats pretty pathetic. It didn't used to be like that in the WWF/WWE. Not that badly anyway.
Originally Posted by the_ultimate_evil
i know its the whole crux of armchair booking but the fact that the majority of people can see that wwe is misisng a superb product by just a few simple mistakes is astounding.
just simple heel/face turns, pair people together to build the tag titles and work on building a certain level of midcarders.
You're right. I don't think any of us are saying we could be great bookers. But everyone here has seen enough GOOD pro wrestling material and bad material to recognize it when we see it. We've all had history as a great teacher so if you watch long enough you begin to pick up a few things and can recognize the trends. Anyone can.
I think sometimes you have to step out and away from something to be objective. When you are in it for too long its hard to be critical of yourself or your work. You might also need an outsiders fresh set of eyes to step back and get a full look at things. McMahon has been in the middle of it all for so long thast he's lost his objectivity and has creative tunnel vision. And most of his yes men are too afraid of losing their jobs or being punished to tell him when there might be a problem. There is no fine tuned creative quality guage at the top in WWE anymore.
Last edited: