Things you don't want to see happen in the next Superman movies

I'd love to see Superman saving that 'tabloid paper' editor - When the guy says "I hate you", or, "I still question your motives", Superman would shrug his shoulders and reply, "doubting me isn't a crime".

Oh, this is the 'things you don't want to see...... In that case, I don't want the above to not happen :woot:.
 
When he first arrives in Metropolis he would definitely scare people who couldn't figure out what he was and what he wanted. The longer he sticks around the more Metropolitans love him, of course.
Oh yes, absolutely. But after a while, Superman gives an interview to Lois, explaining where he is from and all that, going so far as to reveal that he is vulnerable to Kryptonite so that people will not feel powerless against him.
From then on, people just love Superman. Not just Metropolitans, the whole world. He is Ghandi, Lady Diana, Martin Luther King, Jesus, what have you, all in one.
 
Okay leave Jesus out....He is not Jesus....Remember he is not a GOD....But he is like everyone esle....Oh yeah you forgot to add Malcom X in their aswell.
 
Okay leave Jesus out....He is not Jesus....Remember he is not a GOD....But he is like everyone esle....Oh yeah you forgot to add Malcom X in their aswell.
Why do you take things so literally? Why, is he a blond woman to be Princess Diana? Jesus i meant that in a metaphorical way.
 
yea doing the whole thing some not trusting him when he first shows up with be a nice thing to do. Plus it would be logical thing to do.
 
But he is like everyone esle....

He's everything but like anyone else. No one else has those super-powers to start with. And then no one else can be so incorruptible. You gotta be an alien to resist temptation like he does or... Jesus. Metaphoricaly!
 
what wrong with morgan edge and crime guys they have their place in superman too. Plus could be used as a minor foe to take out between the events of the bigger threat. Plus if they did do intergang plot they can use that as a gateway to open up darkseid down the road.
 
what wrong with morgan edge and crime guys they have their place in superman too. Plus could be used as a minor foe to take out between the events of the bigger threat. Plus if they did do intergang plot they can use that as a gateway to open up darkseid down the road.

Edge was not just the villain he was iintroduced as, he was the NETWORK CEO who ran an ffffing local news operation. The character post Kirby and pre-Byrne is just too aesthetically compromised to be brought back.
 
-would you like to see them create an entirely new power for superman?
-would you like to see a villain kill another villain?
 
Things you don't want to see happen in the next Superman movies
Supes teaching Supes Jr how to fly, run faster, jump, all that.
 
-would you like to see them create an entirely new power for superman?

No, Superman's powerful enough already.

-would you like to see a villain kill another villain?

I wouldn't mind, I guess. It's hard to say without knowing which villains in what context. The villain doing the killing would definitely be established as evil and fearsome.

Who is Supes and who is Supes Jr?

He's probably referring to Jason from SR.
 
Oh... I thought we all agreed that we dont want to see that boy ever again!
Though its less tragic than the comics where Superman is incompatible with Lois and they cant have a child. I mean, during Final Crisis Superman shrunk the earth's population, put it in his fridge for protection and then sang the opposite frequency to Darkseid's so that the two soundwave's would nullify each other and to kill him off completely he used a magic wishing machine and he wished for a happy ending. Like... WTF? But despite all this Silver Age bullcrap he is still incompatible with Lois!

Anyway, its not that i wouldnt want them to have a kid, but it was done so wrong in SR that....

EDIT: Oh yeah. Before Superman did any of that, Wally West and Barry Allen outran death himself and lead him to Darkseid so that he would take him instead. Hahahaha. You need to shoot some smack before you read Final Crisis. It all makes sense then!
 
personally never want to see jason again. I just thought the kid plot in SR was a dumb move there. But we will probably not have to worry about it now. since we pretty much know the next film will have nothing to do with SR or donnor.

I agree we dont need any new super powers for superman. He has enough already and doesnt need more.
 
Oh... I thought we all agreed that we dont want to see that boy ever again!
Though its less tragic than the comics where Superman is incompatible with Lois and they cant have a child. I mean, during Final Crisis Superman shrunk the earth's population, put it in his fridge for protection and then sang the opposite frequency to Darkseid's so that the two soundwave's would nullify each other and to kill him off completely he used a magic wishing machine and he wished for a happy ending. Like... WTF? But despite all this Silver Age bullcrap he is still incompatible with Lois!

Anyway, its not that i wouldnt want them to have a kid, but it was done so wrong in SR that....

EDIT: Oh yeah. Before Superman did any of that, Wally West and Barry Allen outran death himself and lead him to Darkseid so that he would take him instead. Hahahaha. You need to shoot some smack before you read Final Crisis. It all makes sense then!

:dry:

No we all didn't. There won't be a sequel alright. But I liked Jason.

I didn't really mind Jason, either, even though I thought I was going to hate him. Unfortunately, the circumstances surrounding his birth sucked and helped ruin the possibility of a sequel.
 
Honestly, that's what happened. After the grimdark 90ies, Morrison who took over as the chief writer for most of the main DC franchises has brought back the Silver Age with all its impossible, crazy, cheesy, corny plots. In all honesty, most of it is very fun, interesting and refreshing. Like how he sent Batman back in time, where he is living infinite lives and deaths trying to find his normal life. In the meantime we re having Dick as Batman and Damian as Robin. Its a reverse of the normal status quo with a more fun and lighthearted Batman and a more dark, serious and brooding Robin. It wont last forever, but its a nice break from the same thing that has been going on for decades.

Things like that i like, but that stuff in Final Crisis was beyond words. You'd have to do drugs to like it.
I didn't really mind Jason, either, even though I thought I was going to hate him. Unfortunately, the circumstances surrounding his birth sucked and helped ruin the possibility of a sequel.
I agree with this. In the comics Supes has been married to Lois for a long time and DC are afraid to give them a kid out of fear that it might make Superman look older to the fans. As if raising half a dozen Robins doesnt do that to Batman. So you catch yourself wishing that Clark and Lois have a kid so that they can move on to the next step of married life but so far they are incompatible since Clark is alien and they cant have a child.

So i am not against them having a kid, but SR introduced the kid in such a bad way... It was horrible.
 
Last edited:
So Morrison going back to the Silver Age in the comics?.....And Bruce back in time to find his normal life?
 
Yes. Morrison is something like the chief writer of DC right now, especially over Batman and the main crossover events. So with all his power he began a new era that is similar to the Silver Age in that the stories are less dark, the plots are crazy and outlandish, the technology is sci-fi, etc. Its a lot more fun but sometimes it gets ridiculous.

To give you an example of that fun, at some point Batman unlocks a special room in his cave where he keeps all the super advanced technology and takes a flying saucer! At another point his T-Rex in his cave wakes up (its mechanical, a robot) and defends the cave.

Also, Morrison took Batman to Tibet for spiritual training in order to tear him down and rebuild him psychologically. Basically he used that training to bring us a lighter batman. Make no mistake, he is still serious and brooding, but he isnt borderline insane or that much of a dick like he used to be pre-Morrison. Previous writers had brought him to the edge of madness because that was "deep writing" according to them.

Then, the plot of sending a (somewhat) realistic hero like Batman to the past would never have happened in the serious and dark 90ies comics for example. I am trying to catch up to all this but its spread through many comic books and it takes a lot of time. Basically, Darkseid sent batman back to the past, where he lives various lives, dying and getting reincarnated from one to other, and he is trying to find a way to escape all that and get back to his normal life.
Basically its a way to send Bruce on vacation for a while and give Dick the cowl.

That's what i am saying that Nolan took his realism too far. Sure, dont give Batman a flying saucer, but what's so bad with the T-Rex, the huge penny and the joker card in the batcave? Do they need a rationalisation to be there?
 
Last edited:
i asked back in my first post if anyone was against time travel. what if it gave the audience a glimpse of future villains, battles and even the justice league?
 
Yes. Morrison is something like the chief writer of DC right now, especially over Batman and the main crossover events. So with all his power he began a new era that is similar to the Silver Age in that the stories are less dark, the plots are crazy and outlandish, the technology is sci-fi, etc. Its a lot more fun but sometimes it gets ridiculous.

To give you an example of that fun, at some point Batman unlocks a special room in his cave where he keeps all the super advanced technology and takes a flying saucer! At another point his T-Rex in his cave wakes up (its mechanical, a robot) and defends the cave.

Also, Morrison took Batman to Tibet for spiritual training in order to tear him down and rebuild him psychologically. Basically he used that training to bring us a lighter batman. Make no mistake, he is still serious and brooding, but he isnt borderline insane or that much of a dick like he used to be pre-Morrison. Previous writers had brought him to the edge of madness because that was "deep writing" according to them.

Then, the plot of sending a (somewhat) realistic hero like Batman to the past would never have happened in the serious and dark 90ies comics for example. I am trying to catch up to all this but its spread through many comic books and it takes a lot of time. Basically, Darkseid sent batman back to the past, where he lives various lives, dying and getting reincarnated from one to other, and he is trying to find a way to escape all that and get back to his normal life.
Basically its a way to send Bruce on vacation for a while and give Dick the cowl.

That's what i am saying that Nolan took his realism too far. Sure, dont give Batman a flying saucer, but what's so bad with the T-Rex, the huge penny and the joker card in the batcave? Do they need a rationalisation to be there?

I loved the silver age DC comics....They need more DC movies based off that era involving Batman and Superman.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"