Still A ThorFan
Sidekick
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2004
- Messages
- 1,255
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
My response is illogical.
My response is illogical.
Well hey wether people liked it or not the version of Thor in the Hulk movie wasn't EXACTLY the same origin either, and that Thor ALMOST had a tv seires then.Why is it unnecessary? Just because they are not following the Journey Into Mystery formula? If that is your reason the majority of people are glad that formula is not being followed, a lot of people such as myself are very happy that Donald Blake is not in the film.
And yes Asgard itself is set in a midieval timeframe but Thor has been around for thousands of years so what is so illogical about showing that time on film?
I think you're just upset because you're not getting the version of Thor that you want, which is ER meets Superman.
Well hey wether people liked it or not the version of Thor in the Hulk movie wasn't EXACTLY the same origin either, and that Thor ALMOST had a tv seires then.
I think comic book writters are under the WGA, can't be sure, but Thor from my understanding, has been wrtten several issues ahead.Are comic book writers under the WGA? Are comic books even within the parameters of the strike?
Stillathorfan, do you have the direct link to that info above?
http://twitchfilm.net/site/view/40t...lks-thor-jackie-brown-and-of-course-stardust/Stillathorfan, do you have the direct link to that info above?
lol MAN I wish we knew who is going to be Thor!
Any word on a director?
You're a funny guy. At least I'm assuming you're joking. Right?
If not it's Matthew Vaughn (Layer Cake/Stardust). Director of Photography has also been snagged.
Haha. You didn't fall for it. It's a old fanboy joke. Good for you, you didn't fall for it like some others do