IMDB lists the Hulk in the new Avengers movie. But, Edward Norton isnt listed as the hulk. It appears Lou Ferrigno is rumored to be the voice of the Hulk. So I wonder if they will just be using a CGI version of the Hulk with no one playing his other half Bruce Banner.
What do you guys think? Will the Hulk be the villain for the new Avengers movie?
Here is the link. Go check it for yourself:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0848228/fullcredits#cast
http://movies.ign.com/articles/104/1042023p1.htmlAvengers Not Planned
Ed Norton gives update on superhero mash-up.
by Orlando Parfitt, IGN UK
UK, November 4, 2009 - Ed Norton has once again been grilled about the future of the Hulk and Avenger movies, and once again he doesn't sound that enthusiastic or hopeful about his future involvement.
The Incredible Hulk star was speaking to Aint It Cool and had this to say about the state of the franchises: "I'm not even sure deep inside the minds of Marvel how they are planning to string that stuff out, but I don't think any of if is imminent, I don't know."
Norton also said that he would only get involved again if Marvel came up with some interesting ideas: "Things like that to me are always completely dependent on what they make of it. It's like anything can be the crappy version of itself or the great version of itself and if it's the great version of itself, then that's one thing. If they don't get it right, then I don't know, then I think… A lot of it depends on what they come up with."
The Avengers is currently pencilled in for a May 2012 release, whilst as far as we know a sequel to The Incredible Hulk has not been green-lit.
I wouldnt want to see him as a villain though, I wouldnt mind if for the first half of the movie he is CONSIDERED a villain by the Avengers, but then, during their fight him, some humans are put in danger and Hulk saves them, then they realise he isnt a villain and he joins the team down the road.
What to avoid for better box office success:
1. No more tossing goverment soldiers around... no one wants to see a hero do this especially
during times of war... wrong message.
possibly holding control
That's definitely what happened and that grin on his face gave it away.
As much as I love ambiguous endings.
He shouldn't be a villian. Why bother spending the whole movie promoting him to basically be a destructive but good character and then bring him in as a villian for avengers.
Should he be percieved as a possible threat by others? Yes he should and them trying to detain either Hulk or Banner will be a troubling pain. But will he end up proving them right? Yes and No. He is a force of nature. And Banner won't be able to control him forever lots of mayhem and chaos will ensue. Story wise it would be best if there is still the tention of losing control.
He shouldn't be used as a villian for the avengers. But he is without a doubt definately a legitimate reason for them forming the team until something else emerged.
Well I think the idea would be the government wants Hulk under control and for the Avengers to take him down but they realize he isn't a villian
before the final act . I dont see hulk becoming an official member but instead he would help the team take another villian down and then he would go on his own way.
Tim Roth wants to reprise 'Hulk' role
Tim Roth has revealed that he is willing to return for a sequel to 2008s The Incredible Hulk.
Speaking to MTV, the 48-year-old said that he has spoken to Marvel about possibly reprising the role of villain Emil Blonsky.
"I dont know if they want to bring [Blonsky] back, but I told them Im absolutely game for it. It would be so much fun to do it again. Im in it for three," Roth said, referring to his three-picture deal with Marvel.
He added: "I had the best time ever with that one - more fun on set than anybody. I did it purely for my kids, so my boys can laugh at their dad and have fun with it."
An Incredible Hulk sequel has not yet been announced.