Balthus Dire
Punishment Continues
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2000
- Messages
- 12,709
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31

Good point.He was drunk anyway, and it was almost a year ago now. Geez, we need some new news....
What is going on with this movie? They certainly aren't hyping it much.
My guess is they are figuring if it's even worth putting out in theaters or sending it straight to the $5.00 bin at Wal-Mart.t:
I'm gonna send you to the $5.00 bin at Wal-Mart.........somehow....
We need a movie poster featuring Jigsaw, with Frank and Micro in the background. All shadowed and such like the regular pwz posters.
Kable it's to see again buddy.I see you are starting trouble again tooMy guess is they are figuring if it's even worth putting out in theaters or sending it straight to the $5.00 bin at Wal-Mart.t:
Well I wouldn't say that.With the new game,burst,lego toys and they are working on a new trailer!I agree with Citizenpain. I'll next month or November, we should hear and see somethingI agree with the lack of new info I'm starting to think joe drake really does want this movie to fail.
To base the Punisher off of a whny a$$ cry-baby whose antogonists cosist of Jigsaw (of all villains) and amalgamations of reputable villains such as Pittsy Mginty, and Ink, in my opinion is the wrong direction. For visual appeal, maybe this film will generate some quarters but as a Punisher film Hell no Mary Joe. I like how this film looks but why does it have to be a Punisher film?Look through the comics, about a handful of the panels actually have that completely red or green coloring. The rest is colored normally, and not yellow or "neon" colored.
To base the lighting off of a few panels of the comic was in my opinion the wrong direction.
They're working on a new trailer? Where'd you hear that?
See I don't really see why they would really need Loony Bin Jim too. I would have rather seen Frank and Pittsy going at it, **** they probably could have still hired Huchison to be Ink.To base the Punisher off of a whny a$$ cry-baby whose antogonists cosist of Jigsaw (of all villains) and amalgamations of reputable villains such as Pittsy Mginty, and Ink, in my opinion is the wrong direction. For visual appeal, maybe this film will generate some quarters but as a Punisher film Hell no Mary Joe. I like how this film looks but why does it have to be a Punisher film?
Can't it be Unknown Shield Agent X or something?![]()
No no no, Thomas Jane isn't in this one, RAY STEVENSON is. You already saw the Punisher with the whiny-a$$ cry baby.To base the Punisher off of a whny a$$ cry-baby
They probably wanted someone that a more general Punisher fan would recognize in this one, unlike the last. Jigsaw's Punisher's Lex Luthor, although Jigsaw certainly isn't an amazing villain by any stretch of the word.I would have rather seen Frank and Pittsy going at it
No no no, Thomas Jane isn't in this one, RAY STEVENSON is. You already saw the Punisher with the whiny-a$$ cry baby.
http://www.newsarama.com/film/080711-kevin-feige-interview.html .It's a interview with Kevin Feige the Marvel President of production,he mention PWZ and he said LGF is working on a new trailer that should be out soonThey're working on a new trailer? Where'd you hear that?
Following huh? Are you sure about thatTo base the Punisher off of a whny a$$ cry-baby whose antogonists cosist of Jigsaw (of all villains) and amalgamations of reputable villains such as Pittsy Mginty, and Ink, in my opinion is the wrong direction. For visual appeal, maybe this film will generate some quarters but as a Punisher film Hell no Mary Joe. I like how this film looks but why does it have to be a Punisher film?
Can't it be Unknown Shield Agent X or something?
Follow where the little red laser dot is resting at.