Its an ensemble film but Superman gets the second most screentime in that script; next to Batman (whos essentially the main character).
How do you know that?
In the original OMAC storyline, Superman was a b-story essentially. He goes crazy and the OMACs start killing meta-human/superheroes...
The mysteries in that story are why Clark went crazy and who was controlling the OMACs and stole the brother I satellite that controlled them and tracked the meta humans....
Batman and Wonder Woman have to figure that out... Although I'd love for Superman to be the prime character, if that's the story they're following, he won't be.
Justice Bringer said:
Its unrealistic to believe they could film all of Superman's scenes and action sequences within such a short period...in a month; especially when most of his scenes involve the other characters.
How do you know that? Have you read the script?
In the original story, most of Superman's scenes with the other superheroes were either at Max Lord's Swiss hide-out or battling Wonder Woman or up at the Watch Tower....
It wasn't like he had a lot of scenes...
Justice Bringer said:
And the period announced in the casting call is accurate. Fox studios in Australia is doing Wolverine before JLA and is booked to do another picture right after. Its tight scheduling.
Yeah, so?
I brought that up because you can't base the needs of one actor's filming schedule on general casting notices. He could very well only be needed for a fraction of the total production schedule.
Justice Bringer said:
Clearly they don't. I'm starting to have doubts they ever did.
Again, how do you know?
You got an in somewhere on the Warner's lot? You know some suits over there?
It's all conjecture and speculation at this point. We don't know what's happening any more than you do but you state your opinions as fact.
You should know better by now that won't wash.
Me either. I'm doubting how open I'm going to be to seeing another actor in the role on the big screen again. I honestly don't know.
I don't know if I'll buy yet another Superman. I didn't totally buy brandon, for reasons I won't get into, but yet another person playing superman?
If Tom doesn't get it, I'll have to see how I feel once I see the guy and his performance.
Serene said:
Coudn't agree more. But...I do think it would be a bad decision career-wise for Tom to pass on this if it was ever offered to him. Sure, he's got amazing on-screen charisma, but getting good breaks in Hollywood, (i.e. decent scripts) is a very hard thing, and maybe even harder for a guy who's spent the last 6 years in a genre based TV show. I'd love for Tom to WANT to continue his portrayal of the MOS, and to play it for all it's worth.
If he doesn't *want* it though, that's a whole 'nother story. I'll still support him no matter what he does, but until we know otherwise, I won't stop hoping for him to get this role in this movie.
Russell Crowe said once the main reason he didn't work for two years after his break out American role in LA Confidential was because of the crap people kept sending him.
There are hundreds of thousands of scripts registered each year with the WGA script registration service but only a few hundred films get produced annually.
You do the math and that's possible proof that most scripts are dreck.
So Tom would be short-sighted to wait for something better to come along since there is no guarantee that something better ever will.
This is a huge tentpole and could mean a lot to Tom's career if he shows he can help carry it.
If he decided to pass, I'd understand the reasons why he wouldn't want to but there might not be any right answer for him with this...
There are pros and cons either way...
you act as if you have a clue as to what the script really looks like
He has no clue.
Even if the script only loosely follows the OMAC storyline, as it is rumored it will, then Superman won't be the main character.
It'll be an ensemble action flick, more like X-Men than Batman Begins.