Tom Welling as Superman

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dear Kal, i appreciate you sticking up for me while i was not around.

Dear, Superboy, we can have all sorts of "technical" arguments if you want. Try these:
First, i will respond to your assertion that i should have been more constructive in my critique of your manip. i think your your manip is amateurish at best. it is obviously photoshoped, and Superman's head is too big for his body. The S sheild on his chest is fuzzy and not properly positioned on his torso. The outline of his legs look hand drawn, and his cape lacks texture, and the background looks completely out of focus that it looks like it was made with a low quality photocopier that you taped a planet on top of one building. in my opinion if you want to improve the manip, start over from scratch.

Second, in only one incarnation of Superman that i can think of, did Supes have an "s" shield on his belt. That was Superman Returns. As you well know, there is a long standing rule in this forum, imposed by the mods which subjects a user to banning if they discuss SR here. By placing tom welling's head on superman's body, with an "s" shield on his belt you are specifically referencing Superman Returns. Indeed it could lead to flaming, which is exactly what the rule was meant to enjoin. Want proof? You immediately began your tirade about the bashing of SR and BR on these boards, when in fact i said no such thing, which Kal was very quick to point out. Your words belay your actions and reveal your motives.

As such, I feel your posting of an SR-related manip specifically subjects you to banning for breaking the rule and specifically attempting to incite flaming.

Should you wish to continue this conversation further, i would GLADLY continue to indulge you.
 
Kaboom said:
Dear, Superboy, we can have all sorts of "technical" arguments if you want. Try these:
First, i will respond to your assertion that i should have been more constructive in my critique of your manip. i think your your manip is amateurish at best. it is obviously photoshoped, and Superman's head is too big for his body. The S sheild on his chest is fuzzy and not properly positioned on his torso. The outline of his legs look hand drawn, and his cape lacks texture, and the background looks completely out of focus that it looks like it was made with a low quality photocopier that you taped a planet on top of one building. in my opinion if you want to improve the manip, start over from scratch.
Thank you very much, I'll keep this in mind :up:. The Background is from a SV screencap, but I just stretched it, just to give it a background :D
Kaboom said:
Second, in only one incarnation of Superman that i can think of, did Supes have an "s" shield on his belt. That was Superman Returns. As you well know, there is a long standing rule in this forum, imposed by the mods which subjects a user to banning if they discuss SR here. By placing tom welling's head on superman's body, with an "s" shield on his belt you are specifically referencing Superman Returns. Indeed it could lead to flaming, which is exactly what the rule was meant to enjoin. Want proof? You immediately began your tirade about the bashing of SR and BR on these boards, when in fact i said no such thing, which Kal was very quick to point out. Your words belay your actions and reveal your motives.

As such, I feel your posting of an SR-related manip specifically subjects you to banning for breaking the rule and specifically attempting to incite flaming.

Should you wish to continue this conversation further, i would GLADLY continue to indulge you.
Never meant to incite flaming with the manip :confused:, sorry if it seemed that way...
 
As posted by somebody over at IMDb:

wellingleesupermencroppedqy7.jpg


Nice. :)
 
someone should tell the cw they put the words on backwards
 
Kaboom said:
someone should tell the cw they put the words on backwards
Well, they did spell Kreuk's name wrong last season. Looks like they're two for two now. LOL :p
 
There's a poll on the Superman homepage asking who is our favourite Clark Kent. You can vote for Tom as well, he's currently at nº2 behind Chris.
 
Bruce_Wayne29 said:
There's a poll on the Superman homepage asking which is our favourite Clark Kent. You can vote for Tom as well, he's currently at nº2 behind Chris.

Thanks, BW! :)
 
I'm not even registered at the supermanhomepage so I can't vote.

How is the voting going?
 
Kaboom said:
Second, in only one incarnation of Superman that i can think of, did Supes have an "s" shield on his belt. That was Superman Returns.
To correct you Superman now does have a \S/ on the belt starting in Oct. with the new Action Comics

Look at the belt when he is holding the guy up.

actionkubert.jpg
 
Serene said:
I'm not even registered at the supermanhomepage so I can't vote.

How is the voting going?

I registered just to vote. :D
 
avidreader said:
I registered just to vote. :D

Okay, I will too then. It's like doing my duty to Tom and my country.. er..or something like that. ;)
 
Serene said:
I'm not even registered at the supermanhomepage so I can't vote.

How is the voting going?

As of now:
Chris - 50 votes
Tom - 26 votes
Dean - 24 votes
Routh - 22 votes

Keep those votes coming !
 
avidreader said:
I registered just to vote. :D

How long did it take for you to be activated? I registered earlier today, but my acct. still isn't activated.

:(
 
All-Star Superman said:
To correct you Superman now does have a \S/ on the belt starting in Oct. with the new Action Comics

Look at the belt when he is holding the guy up.

They're probably just doing that in response to the movie in an attempt to shut up some of the comments about Singer's costume. Which IMHO is the wrong reason.
 
I was a member but now they said that my username was unknown. So after trying several times unsuccessfully I registered again. And my account has not been activated either.

Would it have to do with my signature? I wonder... ;)
 
Whiteflag said:
I was a member but now they said that my username was unknown. So after trying several times unsuccessfully I registered again. And my account has not been activated either.

Would it have to do with my signature? I wonder... ;)
The same thing happened to me?! :mad: I tried all of my passwords (I use more than one) but no dice. Tried to have it send me a new password but it said they didn't have my e-mail addy, which is BS because they still send me those stupid monthy reports where they drone on and on about ... things I'm not interested in. I got so frustrated, I just said to hell with it. I don't need to be a member there if they're going to ditch me w/o any kind of notice. Bleep 'em.
 
NHawk19 said:
They're probably just doing that in response to the movie in an attempt to shut up some of the comments about Singer's costume. Which IMHO is the wrong reason.
To be honest this was planned before the movie came out but hey what ever makes you guys happy keep telling yourself that.
 
AgentPat said:
As posted by somebody over at IMDb:

wellingleesupermencroppedqy7.jpg


Nice. :)
Then I guess Bruce Wayne was based off of Tom Welling too because Jim Lee draws all his people the same.
 
Who cares if 1 artist is designing Superman with the belt like that?
 
For info purposes, the \S/ was on the belt a long time ago in 1940.

Superman%20Painting.jpg
 
Serene said:
How long did it take for you to be activated? I registered earlier today, but my acct. still isn't activated.

:(
Whiteflag said:
I was a member but now they said that my username was unknown. So after trying several times unsuccessfully I registered again. And my account has not been activated either.

Would it have to do with my signature? I wonder...
AgentPat said:
The same thing happened to me?! I tried all of my passwords (I use more than one) but no dice. Tried to have it send me a new password but it said they didn't have my e-mail addy, which is BS because they still send me those stupid monthy reports where they drone on and on about ... things I'm not interested in. I got so frustrated, I just said to hell with it. I don't need to be a member there if they're going to ditch me w/o any kind of notice. Bleep 'em.

Well that's very weird. Especially when if you look at the main page you see this:

Registered Members: 7,444
Unactivated Members: 26
Newest Member: mifkent

And that "newest" member was activated yesterday.
The things that make you go Hmmm...

Hopefully they'll work it out later today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"