Tom Welling as Superman

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gosh I swear a part of me wishes Robert didnt make that annoucement cause every day its like torture!

No news is good news, if you ask me.
No official word to debunk Robert's announcement, just Gough's pissy response.
We are finally going to get OUR SUPERMAN. :wow: SWEET!!! :woot:


http://team-el.superforum.fr/
pubteamelff1.jpg
 
I agree with an earlier poster. I wonder if the lack of news means they are negotiating and just can't announce since they are not done?
 
I agree with an earlier poster. I wonder if the lack of news means they are negotiating and just can't announce since they are not done?

It's possible.

We can hope.

*crosses fingers and thinks positive Tommy-superman thoughts*

:ninja:
 
Interesting....


Studios and Production Companies set their pre-strike priorities
By Edward Havens
September 13th, 2007

You may or may not have heard that there is a distinct possibility that the Writers Guild, the Directors Guild AND the Screen Actors Guild will all be striking next spring, if negotiations with the Producers Guild do not get settled between now and then. With the chance that they might go months without any new productions, everyone in Hollywood is making sure their pet projects are getting set up before the hurricane hits.

A list starting circulating around the talent agencies two weeks ago, listing the 300 projects in active development which have become pre-strike priorities for the major studios and a number of top production companies. This list does not mean all of these projects will be completed before the strike date or that they will come together in time. A few titles have already started shooting, some others have set production start dates, and a couple will likely end up on somebody's Best Films Never Made list a few years down the road.

You'll also notice certain directors have their names attached to two or more projects, while a number of them have no director attached. Hell, even Hollywood pariah David O. Russell is getting a bump thanks to the strike threat. Just that these are the films these companies are putting their muscle behind, hoping to keep their distribution pipeline open and flowing in case of a work stoppage.

As of August 29, 2007, these are the main priorities for Hollywood, in case of emergency:

WARNER BROTHERS
1906 - Dir: Brad Bird
ALTERED CARBON - Dir: James McTeigue
ARRANGED - Dir: Gary Winick
CARPE DEMON - Dir: None attached
CLASH OF THE TITANS - Dir: None attached
THE DIRTY DOZEN - Dir: Guy Ritchie
FARRAGUT NORTH - Dir: None attached
GUARDIANS OF GA'HOOLE - Dir: None attached
HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE - Dir: David Yates
HEART SHAPED BOX - Dir: Neil Jordan
HIMELFARB - Dir: Miguel Arteta
THE INCREDIBLE MR LIMPET - Dir: Chris Columbus
JUSTICE LEAGUE - Dir: None attached, but looking to George Miller
LOSERS - Dir:
MEN - Dir: Todd Phillips
MORTDECAI - Dir: None attached
NIGHTCRAWLERS - Dir: McG
PENETRATION - Dir: Ridley Scott
SHANTARAM - Dir: Mira Nair
SHERLOCK HOLMES - Dir: None attached
SPOOKS APPRENTICE - Dir: Tim Burton
THE TOWN - Dir: Adrian Lyne
YES MAN - Dir: Peyton Reed

[other studio lists snipped for brevity]


http://www.filmjerk.com/news/article.php?id_new=521
 
Does anyone know what the strike is actually about?

More pay, better conditions? :huh:
 
Well, that doesn't mean it won't be made; it just means it's not on the list of films in active pre-strike development. But we already knew that. Sort of.
 
Does anyone know what the strike is actually about?

More pay, better conditions? :huh:

Essentially, Pat is right: more money.

All the guilds, the writers, actors and directors, all want more profit participation in the new forms of electronic distribution.

Right now, they don't get squat when a film or TV show is downloaded.

There are also ancilliary issues... I know the writers also want non-scripted shows where writers are listed as "producers" to be included in WGA contracts.

I'm not sure what other issues, if any, are bothering the directors and actors.
 
been hiding in the batbords and community.
Well gee, come by more often, eh? We don't bite.
evillaugh.gif


:D ;)


A few odds and ends...


  • Regarding the 2010 release date for JLA as posted over at SHP, something occurred to me: Warner Bros. does NOT announce release dates until a film is greenlit. Universal is the same way. Despite what OWF posted, I don't think JLA has "officially" been greenlit yet, which would explain the confusion over what year it's being skedded for release. Just thought I'd mention that.

  • Warner Home Video is now pushing - and pushing HARD - next week's release of SV's S6 on home vid. The ad's tag line is: "The forces of evil are gathering, and the fight for justice begins." Hah! The box set streets on 9/18. It's currently #4 on Amazon's top seller list.

  • I was catching up on some recent issues of Variety this afternoon and came across an interesting article about ComicCon and Hollywood's interest in attracting "fanboys." Dan Lin was mentioned by name. Here's an excerpt:

    A few years ago, studios saw the decision to tap genre directors Sam Raimi and Peter Jackson to helm high-stakes tentpoles as a risky move, and yet such directors' personal allegiances to the "Spider-Man" and "Lord of the Rings" mythologies clearly worked to the advantage of those franchises.

    But as Joss Whedon's "Serenity," James Gunn's "Slither" and the Robert Rodriguez/Quentin Tarantino "Grindhouse" experiment recently demonstrated, having a geek at the wheel may help to preserve the integrity of the concept among fans, but it can also limit a project's crossover appeal.

    "There is value added to bring different perspectives to these movies," says Warners senior VP of production Dan Lin, a genre-film enthusiast who brought both the superhero ensembler "Justice League" and Hong Kong remake "The Departed" to the studio. "If we let fanboys make every one of these movies, they wouldn't necessarily break out."


:ninja:
 
Do you have a link? not that I don't believe you, just would like to read it myself.... and thats gotta be a mistake....
 
For those chomping at the bit. The latest from IESB:


Question: This whole Welling for Superman story arc has certainly lost alot of steam hasn't it?

Sanchez: Patience is a virtue. Hollywood is pretty much shut down because of Rosh Hashanah. A few offices are open but I don't expect anything for about a week.​


So hang in there folks. It's amazing Hollywood gets anything done, what with the Toronto film festival and now Rosh Hashanah holiday throwing a big honkin' monkey wrench into predicting when an announcement would be made. Oh well. I can be patient. Sort of. LOL
 
Well gee, come by more often, eh? We don't bite.
evillaugh.gif


:D ;)


A few odds and ends...

[*]Warner Home Video is now pushing - and pushing HARD - next week's release of SV's S6 on home vid. The ad's tag line is: "The forces of evil are gathering, and the fight for justice begins." Hah! The box set streets on 9/18. It's currently #4 on Amazon's top seller list.
:ninja:

Just to piggy back on Pat's observation about WHV using "Justice" to sell the DVD....

Not for nothing, but everyone should go to their local comic shop and check out the DC Direct section in the October PREVIEWS when it ships in a couple weeks. Just sayin. ;D

:ninja:
 
I think he meant he wanted a link to that Variety article....
The one with Dan Lin's comments? Okay, no prob. :D

You need an account to read the article, so for those who don't, here's the whole thing. Link is at the end...

Variety
7/25/07

Execs cash in on comics, action figures
The geeks shall inherit the industry
By GREGORY ELLWOOD

TIP SHEET
WHAT: Comic-Con Intl.: San Diego
WHERE: San Diego Convention Center
FEATURING: Panels, screenings, portfolio reviews, Will Eisner Comic Industry Awards
WEBSITE: comic-con.org
Photo Gallery from Comic-Con 2007:
• Iron Man Q&A photos
• The Incredible Hulk Q&A photos
• Disney Q&A photos
• '30 Days of Night' panel
• 'Superbad' panel
• 'Resident Evil: Extinction' panel
• Bionic Woman Q&A photos
• Fans at Comic-Con: Part One, Part Two
• Exhibits at Comic-Con

When four of the five top-grossing movies this year are based on comicbooks, rides or '80s toy lines, there's no question it pays for studios to listen to the fans, many of whom were working in Hollywood all along.

It's one thing when a producer like Jerry Bruckheimer pitches a project, but lately it has been the so-called "geeks" themselves -- guys such as "300" director Zack Snyder who grew up on comicbooks and videogames -- responsible for shepherding those properties to the screen.

"There's a history of people coming to this town and running away from what they were in high school," says Jeff Katz, a production VP at Fox who was brought in to be the studio's "resident geek." "Now, it's cool to still be the same guy you were in high school -- if anything, what every studio wants at some level is a guy to fill that niche."

In his time at New Line, Katz tried to convince the studio to option "Transformers," to no avail. Today, Katz is just one of a growing number of development gurus whose fanboy expertise has gained credibility as such films have taken off at the box office.

Commercial success has helped to abolish the nerd stigma, says DreamWorks production prexy Adam Goodman, an avid videogame player and genre fan himself.

"Nowadays, if you are into comicbooks in Hollywood, you have a vocabulary that most filmmakers grew up with. You can converse in areas that many people respect," Goodman explains.

A few years ago, studios saw the decision to tap genre directors Sam Raimi and Peter Jackson to helm high-stakes tentpoles as a risky move, and yet such directors' personal allegiances to the "Spider-Man" and "Lord of the Rings" mythologies clearly worked to the advantage of those franchises.

But as Joss Whedon's "Serenity," James Gunn's "Slither" and the Robert Rodriguez/Quentin Tarantino "Grindhouse" experiment recently demonstrated, having a geek at the wheel may help to preserve the integrity of the concept among fans, but it can also limit a project's crossover appeal.

"There is value added to bring different perspectives to these movies," says Warners senior VP of production Dan Lin, a genre-film enthusiast who brought both the superhero ensembler "Justice League" and Hong Kong remake "The Departed" to the studio. "If we let fanboys make every one of these movies, they wouldn't necessarily break out."

An admitted fanboy recently promoted to senior VP of production at Universal, Scott Bernstein has witnessed a growing acceptance of "geekdom" among higher-ups. His studio is prepping a "reinvention" of the action thriller "Death Race" and is in production with Guillermo Del Toro's "Hellboy 2," Timur Bekmambetov's "Wanted" and a new incarnation of "The Incredible Hulk."

"I'm making ("Death Race") because it's a fanboy's wet dream," Bernstein says. "I think that's the mentality (around town). Look how Paramount is re-branding 'Star Trek' with J.J. Abrams. That wouldn't have happened five years ago. That was a dead franchise."

Hollywood naturally tends to attract film buffs: Just as Disney draws animation enthusiasts hoping to work with the characters they loved as kids, the "Star Trek" franchise is responsible for luring many of the creative personalities who now staff Paramount Studios.

In Abrams' case, it was actually Paramount who approached him about directing a new "Star Trek," an idea that appealed to the self-described "geek."

"I think the key to all of this is to try to tell the kind of stories that (fellow genre fans) really want to see," Abrams says. "When we did 'Lost,' the idea of doing sci-fi on television was pretty much verboten, and it was shocking to me they went for it."

But maybe geek chic isn't such a new thing after all. According to "Transformers" producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura, such things go in cycles, and the number of fan-savvy creative execs hasn't really changed since he served as president of production for Warners more than a decade ago.

"There were always two or three guys at each studio who believed in those properties," remembers di Bonaventura, who is developing a "G.I. Joe" feature at Paramount. "The rule of the studios has been that the generation doing the decision-making is not the generation that grew up with the intellectual property."

But many of the adaptations recently announced, including an animated "Thundercats" pic and a live-action "He-Man," were cartoons that today's thirtysomethings watched while doing their homework as kids.

According to Lin, who is overseeing those two projects for Warners, such properties come with a built-in awareness and lend themselves to tentpole-worthy spectacle.

"When I first got here, it was about the movie-star movies. Now it's evolved into event movies," he says. "My job is to bring my bosses what I'm into. You certainly see a lot of younger guys who grew up with these comicbooks and TV shows pushing these projects forward."



http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117969171
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,435
Messages
22,106,267
Members
45,898
Latest member
NeonWaves64
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"