jdogg willie said:People,
Get over this "Welling as Superman" notion. He has stated time and time after time again that he DOES NOT want to portray Superman on the big screen. Just give it time, we'll see him as Superman on the Smallville series finale

jdogg willie said:People,
Get over this "Welling as Superman" notion. He has stated time and time after time again that he DOES NOT want to portray Superman on the big screen. Just give it time, we'll see him as Superman on the Smallville series finale

jdogg willie said:People,
Get over this "Welling as Superman" notion. He has stated time and time after time again that he DOES NOT want to portray Superman on the big screen. Just give it time, we'll see him as Superman on the Smallville series finale
jdogg willie said:He has stated time and time after time again that he DOES NOT want to portray Superman on the big screen.
It's completely false, Scoots. Welling has never, EVER said that. Not even eluded to it. He's never spoken publicly about not wanting the role, just what the consequences would be if he accepted such an offer. That's it. Nothing more, nothing less.Scooter said:I heard this bandied about quite a bit. Is it true?
Yes he did when he was talking about why he turned down the role of Clark. He said he did not want to play Clark going off to college or Clark becoming Superman. He said he did not want to do SV at first because he thought he would have to put on the tights. Now his way of thinking may have changed but thats what he said then.AgentPat said:It's completely false, Scoots. Welling has never, EVER said that. Not even eluded to it. He's never spoken publicly about not wanting the role, just what the consequences would be if he accepted such an offer. That's it. Nothing more, nothing less.
A. He was talking about Smallville in that Wizard interview.Tony_Montana said:Yes he did when he was talking about why he turned down the role of Clark. He said he did not want to play Clark going off to college or Clark becoming Superman. He said he did not want to do SV at first because he thought he would have to put on the tights. Now his way of thinking may have changed but thats what he said then.

Yes he did Pat this was brought up long ago in the Superman forum if you remember during the casting wars with proof of him saying this. You and I both know he said he did not want to wear the tights and everything else. only reason why I will not do a search is because its not that big of a deal to me since Welling will not be Superman.AgentPat said:A. He was talking about Smallville in that Wizard interview.
B. He's never mentioned wearing the tights as being objectionable in ANY interview.
C. If you're going to argue this topic, please bring facts to the table.
Thanks for playing though.![]()
In other words I dont want to be Superman. Now as I said before things have changed since then but he did say it in the past but you can take it how ever you wish.Tom Welling said:How long do you see yourself continuing to play Clark Kent?
You mean, how long do I think that the show is going to last? I think that we have at least three or four more years. I think that we’ll go on for at least a five-year period, but I don’t have any interest to play Clark Kent in college, Clark Kent at his first job, Clark Kent becoming Superman, Clark Kent dying.
I've been 'round for quite a while. I've never seen this "proof." Present the evidence or drop the argument. Absence of evidence isn't evidence.Tony_Montana said:Yes he did Pat this was brought up long ago in the Superman forum if you remember during the casting wars with proof of him saying this. You and I both know he said he did not want to wear the tights and everything else.
...it doesn't exist?only reason why I will not do a search is because...
You certainly like to argue the point enough though. Why is that?...its not that big of a deal to me since Welling will not be Superman.
I take it in the context it was meant. They were talking about SV. At no point during that interview did discussion of a film - or Welling's interest in such - ever come up. But you do bring up one good point: things change. So recent quotes are FAR more important than anything he might have said three, four, or five years ago.In other words I dont want to be Superman. Now as I said before things have changed since then but he did say it in the past but you can take it how ever you wish.
Actually he has, but it was a while ago, and he may have changed his mind. Unfortunately I can't remember where it was that he said it ...AgentPat said:He's never mentioned wearing the tights as being objectionable in ANY interview.

Interesting. Since the interview was a while ago, can I assume the comments were in regards to the show and not a film? His initial apprehension during the show's casting process, perhaps?jas01724 said:Actually he has, but it was a while ago, and he may have changed his mind...

Yes Pat it was about the show not the movie.AgentPat said:Interesting. Since the interview was a while ago, can I assume the comments were in regards to the show and not a film? His initial apprehension during the show's casting process, perhaps?
And for shame! You don't have the interview? James, you're slippin' dude.
Still gotta luv that (non)comment about the other suit though. That was priceless. heh.
It was about the show, but it was a very definite "I don't want to be seen in tights!" I don't think the medium would make much difference if he has a thing against wearing stockings.AgentPat said:Interesting. Since the interview was a while ago, can I assume the comments were in regards to the show and not a film? His initial apprehension during the show's casting process, perhaps?

I do have the interview somewhere ... but it's among about 500 others, so I don't think I'm going to find it. *cough*And for shame! You don't have the interview? James, you're slippin' dude.![]()
Tony_Montana said:In other words I dont want to be Superman. Now as I said before things have changed since then but he did say it in the past but you can take it how ever you wish.
AgentPat said:Interesting. Since the interview was a while ago, can I assume the comments were in regards to the show and not a film? His initial apprehension during the show's casting process, perhaps?
And for shame! You don't have the interview? James, you're slippin' dude.
Still gotta luv that (non)comment about the other suit though. That was priceless. heh.
Bruce_Wayne29 said:That was taken completly out of context. He was refering to the show and was kind of giving a warning to Warner Bros. in between the lines. He was having a bit of a feud with Warner at the time for constantly going back and forth in decisions to have him in the movie. At that precise time, Warner wanted him to star in a movie AND STILL continue to do the show, which he said he would never do, he said he would only do one of the projects.
Then as a retaliation Warner from what we heard threatened the following: if he wouldn't do both then he would do the show for 10 years, thus covering all periods of Superman's life and that's why he said that which was meant as a public response to such a threat.
Eventually things smoothed enough for them to do negotiations regarding what would then be Superman Returns and they burned him again by going on a nationwide search for an unknown after he had signed a contract (just as Jim Caviezel would later sign, when certain executives at Warner felt they would need some star power to jumpstart the franchise - both of them turned out to be backburner guarantees in case they didn't find their unknown).
He never said he didn't want to be Superman in a movie, he actually said in 2003 that he would be interested given schedule and script. Plus he wouldn't have met with all the directors involved in the project since 2002 and even screen testing for McG thanks to a personal phone call Christopher Reeve made to Alan Horne, then Warner's President.