The Amazing Spider-Man Too Soon!?

[chaseter]

I'm being vague about that PURPOSELY, because there IS no specifically set time for such things. It's vague in nature! It happens at whatever rate it happens, depending on how good the developer is. I doubt there's a recorded measurement of it, and even if there WERE a recorded measurement of it, it would be completely different for every film in existence.

Seriously, I shouldn't have to explain such a basic, common sense thing to you. You're trying to turn the obvious upside down and pretend it's an argument, it's manipulative straw grasping, and I'm close to considering it trolling and a waste of time to respond to.

Further, regarding them not having 'an infinite amount of time to complete the film', who ever said they did? Certainly not me. They could simply spend the time they are given making something more quality based and, lemme see, not crappy?

If there is no set time, why are you arguing about a time frame If you yourself have no idea about the time frame regarding each movie, why even being to try and refute someone else's opinion on the matter? What was the purpose for saying people who don't want the most possible Spidey films in their life time are silly if there is no set amount? If you don't have the slightest clue as to how these things are going to be paced out, why even make that statement? You have no idea about any of this but you pretend as if you do. That makes no sense.

What concept are you explaining? If you have no idea or any solid grasp about any of this, please tell me how you are going to explain it to me. How close are you to considering replying to this a waste of time? Will you reply to this?

I just said that they didn't. You think that these Spider-Man movies are just going to come out whenever and that there is no definite time frame for them, it happens as it happens as you said. That is completely wrong. Movies don't just happen and come out as they are finished. That is utterly wrong. Each studio has a fiscal model and projections of each of their upcoming years in regards to box office profit. They place movies to fill those models to present an optimum level of growth for their company. They pick certain dates to make the most money and they spread out movies so that there is a steady growth and not a rapid increase then decline in their profit margins. They then create a schedule and those approved movies are put into development. Those movies must meet their time frame and work with those constraints. If not, the movie is shelved and the studio moves on. So yes, there is a specific time frame for these things and no, it doesn't happen at whatever rate it happens. If a movie is completely done a year before release, the date isn't moved up a year. That would throw off projections.

 

[RustyCage]

If there is no set time, why are you arguing about a time frame

The time frame isn't 'set', but it does exist. It doesn't have to be set or measured to exist. As I was saying, and as you've predictably ignored, it's a different amount of time for each film in existence, and heavily dependent on how successfully and fast the crew works.

I'm beginning to understand why DAC was saying he was sick of repeating himself to you.

What was the purpose for saying people who don't want the most possible Spidey films in their life time are silly if there is no set amount?

Because my purpose for saying that had nothing to do with the point you're trying to weasel into existence.

What concept are you explaining? If you have no idea or any solid grasp about any of this, please tell me how you are going to explain it to me.

I explained the concept as solidly as it can be explained. Although you could say it's not a 'solid' matter in itself, as expressed above.

How many times are you going to ask the same question with different words over and over again?

How close are you to considering replying to this a waste of time? Will you reply to this?

Definitely troll-ish.

'Close' is past tense. I'm beyond that point. But luckily, I needed something to do since I can't sleep at the moment.

I just said that they didn't.

And I agreed. Even if it was a ridiculously obvious and pointless statement.

You think that these Spider-Man movies are just going to come out whenever and that there is no definite time frame for them, it happens as it happens as you said.

I never said that, you're taking what I said out of context and applying it to your own whimsies.

Let me explain, again, and try to make it less confusing for you. Movies often have set release dates, but the movie could be completed long before that date is met, and be amazing in quality, or it could be delayed and even more time spent on it, and turn out to be crappy. It's a matter of skillfully using the time you're given.

'It happens as it happens' is referring to the time necessary to develop a movie to completion, not when the movie comes out. Time spent beyond what's necessary doesn't make a film necessarily better or worse - that's determined by the quality of the work put into it. Time =/= Quality.

Now, can you stop evading the actual point of the discussion and focus on what I just said?

That is completely wrong. Movies don't just happen and come out as they are finished. That is utterly wrong.

I've been editing out all the times that you've tiresomely repeated and re-repeated yourself, but I thought I'd leave this one in just because it's funny (or maybe I'm just tired enough to think it's funny right now).

You're definitely a person who goes in circles, and it seems like you enjoy dragging other people with you. I'll be stepping off the merry-go-round for a more intellectual and productive discussion after this reply to you, sir.

Those movies must meet their time frame and work with those constraints. If not, the movie is shelved and the studio moves on.

Or, you know, they push the release date down a few more months. Don't you visit this site and read movie news?

I mean, yeah, because Sony was really gonna just throw away something like Spider-man 3 for being a little late. Sam could have spent another half a year on Spidey 3 and they'd've let him, because they knew what an important juggernaut the film franchise was for them, and what it'd do for them financially.

 

[VenomVsSpidey]

All I know, is that this reboot is going to fix the things Raimi screwed over - ex : Great character devolpment, good plots, in favor of the more impoortant things. Like, you know, quips and romance. awesome.

 

[RustyCage]

All I know, is that this reboot is going to fix the things Raimi screwed over - ex : Great character devolpment, good plots, in favor of the more impoortant things. Like, you know, quips and romance. awesome.

So we're all hoping, anyway..

 

[chaseter]

You responded! I guess I am worth the time:heart:

 

[spider-neil]

the reboot is going to be great, it will fix ALL the problems of the raimi movies and it will be like the spidey from the comics has been taken from the pages and places on the big screen...

ha ha I'll believe that when I see that.