Her back story is much more interesting to me then Flash or GL. It even brings a unique subject in the DCU which is Greek mythology.
What exactly do you mean by legacy heritage?
I think the problem female heroes have is that the movies tend to over emphasis sex.
Tomb Raider was one of the most successful heroine movies recently and it had sexual overtones in it.
They tend to not be suitable for all ages.
You think WW will? She's a gorgeous amazon walking around in revealing clothing.......what parent will want to take their kids to that?
WW is already big as a Golden Age character. Not so with Green Lantern/Alan Scott and Flash/Jay Garrick.
I like Marvel Greek Myth (and Norse myth too) better.
The hero is a legitimate God or Half God. Ares vs Hercules. Sounds more ponderous than an Amazonian vs God.
I actually think Huntress will do better than a WW movie. Honestly.......she comes off kind of corny(just being real)
but Huntress can come off relatable......like Bats to a degree.
So long as they're still "talking about it," I'll keep on asking- where the hell is my Green Lantern movie? Seriously. While I'm at it, where's that Superman reboot they should already be discussing? I would even take a Swamp Thing revival, at the pace that the WB's going at right now.
I'm asking for a decent screenplay. What I'm hearing out of them is formulaic Hal Jordan origin story tripe. If that's what I can expect, they should trash the current effort and do it right this time around.
when I went to Comic Con last year...I was at dinner with some people..me, my cousin, and about 3 other people we had met the day before...all sitting around eating and drinking...someone mentioned an Aquaman movie and people started laughing....like an "are you serious?" laugh.....no one cares
I see ALOT more people wanting a GL movie than a WW movie. There's a reason for this.
GL could be DC's Iron Man at the BO if done right. He has a huge following.
WW.........just not sure about her at all. Most of the time you can get a feel of what movies will do well if done right, with her, I just don't see it.
And Major you KNOW even if they dress her in a skirt from head to toe, there will be a lot of sexual references in it.
Heck, even in that JL:M there were rumors that Flash was sexually obsessed with her and had a couple of corny sexual jokes.
I just think with GL you don't have that baggage.
The same thing could be said about Iron Man whose portrayal on page went from sleazy to charming and humorous playboy. The movie cleverly went in th last direction.It's not "what's wrong with his origin" so much as "what's wrong with Hal." Honestly, I've never liked him. Probably never will. The only time he was mildly interesting was back when they confronted his bigotry. In fact, the only people I know who know who he is and give a rat's tail about him exclusively hang around comic shops. To this day, I still have no clue why he's iconic besides lingering around like a rancid carton of milk.
Don't confuse your opinion with fact. WW has a wider appeal than you think. I doubt you have inside information to confirm for sure that GL and Flash are certain.
Kyle Rayner is probably the blandest character ever created.If GL movie is made, I'd rather them use Kyle or Stewart. I to don't see the appeal of Hal.![]()
Kyle Rayner is probably the blandest character ever created.
That doesn't mean he's as good as Spider-man.
Whatever. I hope WB has wisened up and realized their plan they were going about last year was stupid and ridiculous. Especially trying to do something that would mess up Nolan's Batman franchise which they nearly did.
Now DC and WB is totally backtracking. They knew rushing JL like some people here demanded would've screwed them over in the long run.
But let's see how long they continue to feel that way.
So was probably Darkhawk...You do know he's based on Spider-man, right?
So was probably Darkhawk...