Odin's Lapdog
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2003
- Messages
- 32,655
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
The joker never attempts to corrupt batman (unless you mean by testing his moral code about killing).Not really a constant in this film is where we really see that in the time since the last film Batman's presence has attracted attention. He didn't affect the Joker? how when the Joker pretty much admits that he does this because he sees Batman as his equal on the opposite end of his beliefs. He feels they're like the ying and yang and need each other to prove their points. "I'm an agent of chaos" the same way Batman is an agent of justice. Joker has very much been affected by Batman in the film even moreso now that deep down he knows Batman is incorruptible he feels he's more of a challenge.
He affected the mob because they obviously wanted to find a way to get rid of him. You see him checking Maroni a don in what is presumably a nightclube he owns. You see the way he treats even the head of the mob. Maroni feels responsible for helping the Joker he only did so cause he wanted Batman done. So yeah he was affected to. This is in the movie. Batman did affect Gordon cause now Gordon really knows Batman is probably the truest ally he has in that city.
The joker says plenty of things in the film, it doesn't mean he didn't completely own bats at every single turn psychologically with bats only managing him from blowing up the boat.
the mob affect was a constant. Look at what happened when batman turned up at bruce wayne's party or when batman turned up at th club to find that mob boss. He had no effect on the surrounding peeps. Thugs still try to fight him, no one is particularly scared to see him there, he lacked presence.
I'll give you gordon but that doesn't happen till the last scene in the film though.
as opposed to Batman, who is subtle in his presence - just like he should be 
)