TheGrayGhost
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2005
- Messages
- 1,683
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I was wondering when you were going to show up, Mister J. Excellent points.
Indeed Babs and don't get me wrong I'm not "oh noes t3h boycott!1!!!1" on this it's just not really news i wanted to hear but it may yet be either false or misinterpretedBabs Gordon said:fair enough. i want an accurate portrayal as well. i just don't want the momentum of the trilogy to be compromised. that's what i'm worried about.
Mister J said:Doesn't that kind of cut into the proposed plans to feature Two-Face in the third movie?
I think there's definitely a way to get a healthy dose of The Joker without exhausting all his possibilities in this next film. If and when Harvey does complete his transformation, I rather not have him splitting time with anyone else. For that matter, I don't want to have to wait to truly see The Joker in full villainy while contending with the rise of another major villain.
Babs Gordon said:and again i'll reiterate... why is that batman needs to fight these criminals one at a time? at his best he's fighting practically all of them simultaneously... i think we can all agree on that. if handled well, and i highly doubt Nolan would do otherwise, having both two face and joker in the third installment would be fantastic.
The-Night said:Ditto![]()
Boom said:Actually, I withdraw my previous comment:
![]()
![]()
That's my Joker right there.
blindman said:joker should only appear when he kills rachel and at the final fight. in the meantime, batman should be taking care of the gangwar that joker created
Dark Knight said:i agree with that to a certain extent. Joker should kill Rachel...along with others as well...and the Batman will always be one step behind in tracking him. Other potential Joker victims IMO....
Det Flass- he would be a perfect victim for the Joker to just wack....
Sal Maroni- if Joker will be causing chaos...how else to cause chaos and let it be known he is around than kill the top mob boss?
Jim Gordons wife- perhaps kidnapping Gordons wife or perhaps murdering her would provide another test to Jim Gordon and Batman?
Harvey Dent- being responsible for the scarring of Dent near the end would be like icing on the cake.
L0ngsh0t said:i definatley don't think he should be responsible for Dent's scarring...i think they should keep that to the book, and have Maroni do it
i think rachel daws, or who ever the head D.A. is so Harvey Dent replaces him
That scene was ridiculous in Batman Forever. Let's hope they don't repeat it.Dark Knight said:just as long as Batman is NOT in the courtroom during the scarring. Bruce Wayne yes.....but NOT Batman. Having a vigilante in a court of law....would not fit into Nolans realistic vision of the Batman.....
Milkman95 said:Well, one thing's for sure - Nolan's Joker will be somewhat "toned down", which is fine by me. I want a more intelligent scary psychopath this time around. Someone who can match Batman's mental skills.........
And he has to be "toned down" to do that?Milkman95 said:Well, one thing's for sure - Nolan's Joker will be somewhat "toned down", which is fine by me. I want a more intelligent scary psychopath this time around. Someone who can match Batman's mental skills.........
hunter rider said:So you don't want the Joker then ?
El Payaso said:Yes he was, but also post some 'intersting' blab too.
I wasn't trying to have a go but what you posted didn't really seem like EnglishEl Payaso said:
I can confirm that The Joker role is a small and mysterious one in the sequel. It will be nothing like the Jack Nicholson-style showcase that the previous Joker provided.