Rock Sexton
Superhero
- Joined
- May 16, 2008
- Messages
- 9,139
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Discuss.
God, I hope I don't have the same reaction as you guys because I love this cast and I love the potential of this franchise.
It's not a cinematic disaster by any means, but it doesn't reach the highs of the first film as it should. This is not a failed sequel like X-Men Origins : Wolverine or Spider-Man 3.
What "highs" of the first film are you speaking of?
I put Thor in my 2a/2b category with TIH. I loved it to death, but it's a flawed movie.
Really? I thought most of the comic book fandom loved it. I never got the impression that most people thought it was "meh".It's funny how when Thor came out everyone was like "meh", now it's being highly regarded all of a sudden.
Really? I thought most of the comic book fandom loved it. I never got the impression that most people thought it was "meh".
It's funny how when Thor came out everyone was like "meh", now it's being highly regarded all of a sudden.
Yeah most people weren't to crazy about, it's not very high on most ppl's ranking of the MCU films.
It's actually my favorite MCU film. Yes, even more than the first Iron Man or The Avengers.Yeah most people weren't to crazy about, it's not very high on most ppl's ranking of the MCU films.
Mostly emotional highs, Thor was a rousing and touching film for me. Kenneth Branagh did a wonderful job in making us invested in the familial struggle between Thor, Loki and Odin. We weep for Thor when he realizes he can't lift Mjolnir and that his actions may have damned to be forever exiled, just as we cheer for him when he gets back the hammer and reconciles with his father.
That's what The Dark World lacked big time. Any genuine emotion to make us care for these characters.
Is this basically Iron Man 3 all over again?
I don't like that I haven't seen it yet.
They manage to over explain and under explain the plot at the same time.
The prologue is too dense and overall quite poorly done.
Odin seems like a different character than the first, he's the angry Lee/Kirby Odin brought to life in this one so it's both a plus and a negative.
No one is asking for more of the same. All I ask is that the filmmakers make us care for what's happening onscreen. [blackout]Was it too much to ask for some drama regarding Jane's exposure to the Aether? There should be some suspense whether this thing was going to kill her or not, and how Thor deals with it, since this is the woman he loves. But the movie never bothers with it.[/blackout]Where would you have placed that "emotional" high then?
They can't do it literally beat for beat in this sequel, otherwise they're making the same movie all over again.
I figured elements like the Loki trial would potentially satisfy that element. What about Thor/Loki? Do we not get to see the white elephant in the room about their relationship?
[BLACKOUT]Ultimately though, nothing happens in this movie. The character's do not change or learn anything. Their relationships do not change and the main characters are essentially in the same place at the end of the movie as they were in the beginning.[/BLACKOUT]
Over reliance on comedy. Ruined alot of what little sense of drama there was.
Too much humour, underdeveloped villain. Lacked heart of the first film.
Kat Dennings was super annoying in this film.
The humour fell short. [BLACKOUT]Thor having to get a train back to the final undercut any importance to that fight.
Ultimately though, nothing happens in this movie. The character's do not change or learn anything. Their relationships do not change and the main characters are essentially in the same place at the end of the movie as they were in the beginning.[/BLACKOUT]
Is this basically Iron Man 3 all over again?
Well contrary to what cbm fans think, Iron Man 3 is generally regarded ad a good film. Had it not been for that twist cbm fans would think it's a good film as well..