Marvolo
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2006
- Messages
- 47,795
- Reaction score
- 10,771
- Points
- 103
I much, MUCH prefer the Gotham in TDK/R. The fact that it looks real only helps make it more threatening, and it feels so BIG. BB's felt like a set to me a lot of the time... a good set, but a set none the less. Plus, Gotham has looked just like that (a real city) for the vast majority of it's existence in the comics. And I just like that aesthetic better.
It looking "real" isn't the issue. It looking exactly like Chicago and New York and Pittsburgh and LA is the issue with Gotham in TDK and TDKR. BB used Chicago as well, but Nolan at least made a small attempt to give Gotham it's own character. That was entirely lost in TDK and TDKR.
In TDK the shots of the Chicago bridges and Sears/Willis tower pulled me out of the film pretty hard, and in TDKR the shots from Pittsburgh and LA and Chicago did the same thing. Gotham shouldn't look like any of those cities. I'm all for location shooting, but real world locations serving as fictional locations should be dressed up little bit during the shoot or altered in post-production so the viewer isn't reminded that it's Chicago or Pittsburgh or LA that they are looking at.
Nolan got lazy with Gotham in TDK and TDKR.
Another thing that irks me is Nolan's treatment of Wayne tower.
Batman Begins its this building:

In TDK that building loses the Wayne name:

And Wayne enterprises now occupies this building:

And in TDKR, Wayne enterprises occupies this other building and Nolan didn't even bother to make the Wayne name visible. The letters are there but they are a barely visible black color:

I enjoy Nolan's films immensely but some stuff was diluted or down right lost between Batman Begins and TDKR.
I just don't want this sort of thing to happen to the DCCU's Gotham.
Last edited: