GoogleMe94
Sidekick
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 2,401
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
umm, making the film fun and exciting this time.
Trying to meet the fans expectations: this is still Nolan's personal version of Batman and it isn't going to morph into the comicbook or BTAS...unfortunately. t:
Trying to meet WB expectations ($$$$): I would imagine WB wants TDK to reach mega-blockbuster status, seeing as the first film didn't exactly set the world on fire box office wise. Yes it did very well considering it's purpose was to repair the franchise. But like Supes Return, it didn't do the numbers many have come to expect from a marquis character like Batman.
Factor in the crowded 08 summer movie season and the competition....
As some one else said; trying to balance the fantasy with his realistic angle. This is probably the biggest challenge. Like the first film there will come a point in the story where Nolan will have to abandon his reality angle and go with the fantasy aspect of the character(s). How far can he and will he go without betraying his intention of doing a realistic Batman film? Joker, Two-Face, (Riddler) and Batman himself are very fantasy heavy characters. How can Nolan do these characters true justice without reining them in to much?
Balancing Joker, Batman's growth, Harvey Dent's downfall. And o yeah Scarecrow...
The writers are the ones who create the reality. Yea I can see how Nolan tried to make begins more realistic with the prototypes and all, but let's look at "REALITY!" for a second. A man dressed up as a bat catches criminals, a fear toxin makes you see things that aren't there and play on everyone's different personal fears, a league of assassins that have been around since Roman times. Does that all sound real to you? Look whatever the writers wanna do in this movie can be done with whatever characeter they choose to do it with. Hence for future movies I wouldn't count anyone out (maybe crazy quilt man).
The reason Nolan is choosing the characters he is has at least something to do with the fact that their stories aren't incredibly far fetched. They're either straight-up bad or psychologically conflicted men. Some of the more fantastical aspects of their characters are toned down (we never hear about the Lazarus pits of Ra's Al Ghul and we still aren't sure about Joker's chemical bath). The Riddler isn't much more than a neurotic genius. Two-Face has Disassociative (sp?) Personality Disorder and he's a man in considerable political power.
I don't really mind Nolan skirting the fantastical with any of these movies, as long as he's only skirting it. It really begs the question though, of just what villains these movies can use before the reality starts to degenerate.
i agree. everyone whines at the slightest thing that wasnt like it was in the comics so thats his biggest challenge.Pleasing all the fanboys.
'It's benign, Batman.'He goes to the doctor and has it removed.
'It's benign, Batman.'
'Of course it is. I'm the goddamn Batman. I'm more malignant than amy tumour known to man.'
You know, there are effective treatments for that type of thing these days. Someone should have told him before he wreaked horrible, bloody vengeance.The twist is, Rachel gave him a "growth" and he kills her and Nolan has to make it look like an "accident"
Correction, Rapid Bat-fanboys.Pleasing all the fanboys.
Killing rachel and trying to make it a shock.
His biggest challenge so far has been finding a change of clothes.