Which Venom would you prefer? [Pics]

Which Venom do you prefer?

  • Original

  • Variation

  • Recent

  • Other


Results are only viewable after voting.
As long as it's not Erik Larsen's later venom design, with the lower jaw sticking out like an ironing board, I say it's cool.

Hey, Larsen's looked all right in the comic page, but in three dimensions, it'd look too damn silly.
 
str8raz0r said:
As long as it's not Erik Larsen's later venom design, with the lower jaw sticking out like an ironing board, I say it's cool.

Hey, Larsen's looked all right in the comic page, but in three dimensions, it'd look too damn silly.

I agree with every single word in that post. Also if he ever closed his mouth, he would bite off his lower jaw. Horrible underbite, and talking would look horribly unrealistic.
 
Thats true I would stick with McFarlane. His is and always will be the best.
 
I think the reason original is winning, might be because some people actually think the Mark Bagley Venom is the original.
 
venomous said:
Why? I think it looks just as good as any other Venom. Ultimate or not, Bagley drew the best!

Ultimate Venom
Technically, if I remember right, that is actually Peter in the suit at that point, not Eddie.
 
Bagley rules! Even though Todd McFarlane was the bigger name, and revolutionized the way Spider-Man was drawn, (that's what people say, but I don't feel so sure) mark Bagley gave the spidey comis the best look in my opinion. I love his style!

I totally felt like for the movies they made Spider-Man's look John Romitia SR, with a hint of Mark Bagley.
 
Bagley rules! Even though Todd McFarlane was the bigger name, and revolutionized the way Spider-Man was drawn, (that's what people say, but I don't feel so sure) mark Bagley gave the spidey comis the best look in my opinion. I love his style!

I totally felt like for the movies they made Spider-Man's look John Romitia SR, with a hint of Mark Bagley.
 
I know. I still think McFarlanes is the best. Clearly.
 
kiuju2k said:
I know. I still think McFarlanes is the best. Clearly.

i think McFarlane is the better artist, because of his detail. but I think Mrk Bagley's style is more in tune with the feel of Spider-Man. And I also think Mark Bagley ahs more creative artistic talent. he created so many different looks for so many characters, even invented costumes for certain characters, like verybody involved with the clone saga, and even created the original costume design for Carnage.
 
IMO,Bagley is a lot more talented than McFarlane and his Venom design is superior either:spidey:
 
Toren said:
Technically, if I remember right, that is actually Peter in the suit at that point, not Eddie.

Yup, but it's still a kick ass Venom design! ;)
 
Spidey-Jason said:
IMO,Bagley is a lot more talented than McFarlane and his Venom design is superior either:spidey:

Amen to that brother! :up:
 
Jason Martell said:
The Venom I posted in the pictures is only supposed to be like a couple inches taller than Spider-Man, in costume 6 inches would be the most. He's not like the same size as the Hulk or anything.

I thought you were talking about the large Venom in post that started this thread, which is my favourite but I don't think it would work.
 
Even if it might not make sense depending on the origin, I'd like Venom to still have the spider symbol on his chest.
 
Well if Venom ever gets put in a movie I got the perfect look for him, IMO. Since I don't know how to post pics i'm gonna have to ask one of you guys to see if you can get the pics and post them.

Has anyone ever seen the 13' Randy Bowen sculpted VENOM statue??? Its a full body statue where he is standing on top of some bricks/debris and below behind him Spidey is covered/hiding from Venom. IMO that is EXACTLY how I would picture Venom in 3D form.

If anyone can post pics of it, please do. Perfect looking Venom brought to life, IMO.
 
I don´t want a spider symbol. Maybe something that RESEMBLES a spider could be more acceptable.
 
I was always a fan of this picture. And you really dont see it all the often. SO i got it tattooed on me too.

venom.jpg
 
What is the difference between variation and other? I chose other. it's not that I prefer a different Venom, it's just I know that's what we'll get.

What I’m saying is Ock and Goblin didn’t really look like their comic book counterparts. But in actuality that’s a good thing. Why? Well, because with the unique takes on the characters, the movies have had thus far, it helps separate them from the comic books and put them in their own universe.

My guess is that they will do a story where Peter has the symbiote first and thus it will have the spider symbol on it. I think that they won’t have him really large like the books. He’ll be the same size as spider man thus giving more of the feel that he is the evil counter part of Spidey. He’ll have a mouth I think, but not right away, and maybe not all the time. I really think with the way rami has been telling the stories his going to want it to be that Venom is the opposite of Spidey and that he’ll have a lot of the same characteristics. Just my opinion
 
Ock didn't always look the same in the comics, but there were times when he looked how he did in the movie, and Spider-Man looks dead on.
 
There's no reason for them to defer from Venoms image there really isn't. The CGI is good enough and the prosthetics are good enough so to change Venoms appaearance would just be suicidal. I believe this movie will make or break Raimi in the hearts of the true Spidey fans out there becasue he let it slip with SM2 (although Ock and Spidey were spot on the story was uninteresting in places too often).
 
I honestly don't know how you guys can say that. The whole losing his powers, his life being screwed up, Octavius, becoming Dock Ock was all great story. The charcter development of Aunt May I thought was really impressive, and weird as it sounds, I thought some scenes had real emotion to them, like when he's talking to Uncle Ben, or the "There's a hero in all of us" scene, or the part where Peter turns to Dock Ock for help at the end. And Harry' set up, wasn't just a set up, it was story, in my opinion. I think Sam is doing an excellent job, and I respect the fact, that comic book movies are probably the most difficult kind of movie to make. I think with bigger budgets and more time, Sam could have made them a little better, but only had the studio anticipated the success. He didn't know ahead of time that there would most likely be 6 movies.
 
I hope there are 6 movies and then we will get the full picture of Raimi's original intention but I'm afraid of what might happen in SM3 I really am. Sandman worries the hell out of me because he was never that successful in the comics nevermind in a movie. Why oh why not just use Venom this time around eh? I'm sure I'll change my tune once I see the teaser with Spidey looking so good again but for now I remain unimpressed by it all.

You got to admit there are times in SM2 you could of been watching cheap porn!!!!!! And I actually liked the 'hero in all of us speech' very much indeed. Harry's set up worries me too. It's going to be dissappointing if he becomes the GG2 because it's 'another' Goblin but it'll be tiresome if they drag his revenge on Spidey out past SM3. We win we lose - we lose we lose..
 
I know you want him to die in part 3, but I don't. Even though I want this to be the last movie, where he is a villain. In the comic book Harry eventually did come down with some sort of amnesia, and he no longer remembered that Peter is Spider-Man, and he didn't remember being the Green Goblin. I think they should do that as a side story in part 4, and I belive that some time after part 3, Harry should suddenly remember and sacrificie himself to save Spider-Man. It could add heart to a movie, which I think will be difficult to maintain, over and over again. Especially when we get Carnage. It will be so much action, and this could add heart.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"