The Major
Superhero
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2008
- Messages
- 6,749
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
This is a response to X-Maniac in the Wolverine (spoilers) forum that fits here instead since it impacts X-3 more then the Wolverine movie.
Fox could make a Singer X-3 with a snap of their fingers if they desired.
Then again that would require them to admit they screwed up.
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=20443
X-men isn't Superman. He delivered a good movie just not the perfect Superman one. Singer has nothing to prove with making good X-men films. He's already made two.X-Maniac said:And yet Singer had all the time, most of the money and all the creative freedom he wanted at Warner and his revival of the iconic Superman underperformed and did not make back its budget domestically.
He never made X-3 because of Rothman.While most people were curious about what Singer had in store for X3, he never made one, so you can't compare what wasn't ever made with what was.
Fox could make a Singer X-3 with a snap of their fingers if they desired.
Then again that would require them to admit they screwed up.
"Chose" to leave? You should ask Rothman why he left.What you're doing is comparing your dreams and hopes which are intangible and unreal. Singe chose not to make X3, he chose to leave for Superman and he then chose to take the Cyclops actor away too. He wasn't denied the chance to make X3, he chose to abandon the franchise.
Here’s the thing about X-MEN. It may be one of the most flexible and durable film franchises I’ve ever seen. By the very nature of who the X-Men are, you can rotate cast in and out of the series without having to scrap continuity. This is already off to a better financial and creative start than the Bond franchise was, and you see the legs on that one. Why, then, would you allow a personal grudge to lead you to make decisions that will not only kill the golden goose, but also rape it and eat it?
And make no mistake... the rush to make that Memorial Day 2006 release date is about beating Bryan Singer to the screen. The acrimony involved in the Singer/Fox break-up is rich enough to write an entire book about, especially if it leads to the destruction of the franchise. This could turn into one of the all-time great displays of executive hubris in Hollywood. You want to know why you lost Singer to Warner Bros. and SUPERMAN in the first place? Because you took over a year to negotiate his deal to direct X-MEN 3. That should have been one of the biggest no-brainer decisions you could have ever made, but maybe you have to have a brain to make a no-brainer decision. You strung him along and strung him along and strung him along, and then when you had finally proven to him that you weren’t going to make things easy... you were too late. Alan Horn took full advantage of Bryan’s almost-fetishistic love of Donner’s SUPERMAN and your hesitancy, and he stole him from you. I don’t know what’s funnier... throwing Bryan off the lot using security guards, or the fact that you had to let him back on the lot immediately thereafter so he could shoot HOUSE for the studio.
What’s really amazing is how X-MEN was something Rothman hated from the start, no matter what he says now in public. I’ve spoken to at least ten people close to the production who have provided me with laundry lists of the ways that Rothman tried to f*** up the first film. Remember when they cut the budget and moved up the release date on the first X-MEN? You know why? Rothman was cutting his losses. He really, truly anticipated that the film would come out and vanish without a trace, and he would finally be rid of what he saw as a corporate albatross. Instead, the film clicked, and on the second film, Bryan Singer and his writers and the producers were all able to muster enough muscle to get Fox to give them the room they needed to make something even better.
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=20443