Will Hulk be leaping and running fast in the movie?

As I said, you would know. With comments like these, you're a pioneer of sorts:

"I can't believe you are pointing to the only scenes in the entire movie that people actually liked as the reason it failed. Amazing."

-and-

"Wow...watching that again makes me think someone would have to be insane or ******ed to think the Hulk was 'flying'. It could not be more obvious he is jumping. I smell fans of the lame TV show here."

Ad hominem? There's your freaking ad hominem.

In the first post, your expression of disbelief undermines the integrity of my collective feeling about the Hulk and assumes everyone liked the jumping, as presented in the movie. Do I need to tell you what happens when you assume? In the second post, you simply insult November Rain and the TV show that was so popular among people. No stroke of genius there. In fact, there's no particular well-reasoned argument in either of your comments, just the blatant appeal to your own ignorances.

But that doesn't bother me half as much as the fact you've bounced around posts, targeting/isolating things you disagree with, and now expect me to address your so-called "points." I mean, didn't you just come back to the Hype, like, last week? Who do you think you are, the pope?

Fact is if you had been around, you'd know where I stand on the Hulk. Heck, if you had even read the full range of comments I've made in this very thread, you would know the issue of realism in the first Hulk movie was fully discussed by carrrnuttt and myself. But here you come in posts #158 and #159, digging up comments I made before carrrnuttt even entered the discussion and accusing me of ad hominem...

So what am I not responding to that I should respond to? You have no credibility as far as I'm concerned.
Yes...I think I'm the pope. You got me.

And I'm still amazed that you are using the one part of Hulk that was popular with audiences as the reason it failed. If DVD's were like VHS tapes, the desert scene would be worn out on most copies of the movie.

There are reasons why that movie failed, but the desert scenes sure aren't it.
 
And I'm still amazed that you are using the one part of Hulk that was popular with audiences as the reason it failed. If DVD's were like VHS tapes, the desert scene would be worn out on most copies of the movie.

There are reasons why that movie failed, but the desert scenes sure aren't it.


I gotta agree with JKD on this one.
 
Yes...I think I'm the pope. You got me.

And I'm still amazed that you are using the one part of Hulk that was popular with audiences as the reason it failed. If DVD's were like VHS tapes, the desert scene would be worn out on most copies of the movie.

There are reasons why that movie failed, but the desert scenes sure aren't it.

And I'm amazed you're still bossing me around after only coming back to the Hype a week ago. If you're not the pope, you must be my dad or perhaps a manager I didn't know I had. Dad, is that you?? Or something worse... Here he is folks, the Barron of Bloviation! The Earl of Wisdom! The Sultan of Superiority! :whatever:

Once again, it's in your failure to read my posts that your "amaze"ment lies. Everything I feel regarding this topic was summed up in the first full paragraph of post #157. I implore you to consult that post for whatever it is you're looking for. But I don't recall ever saying the desert scenes killed the movie. My problem was always with Hulk's jumping and, more to the point, the way it appeared on the screen.

I suppose you can point to my comment in post #26, "So, if you want another Hulk that fails in the box office, just keep having him leap from plateau to plateau... just like you want it," but that would only further show your ignorance. Yeah, I felt the "flying" contributed to the "borefest" that has been so used by people to describe the movie. And the Enya-esque soundbed, coupled with the philosopher Hulk contemplating his existence between battle sequences, didn't help. But you act like you've stumbled upon some rare observation. Well, what do you want, a gold star? A cookie? Hell, they might even let you ride on the BIG bus for observations like yours. :whatever: :whatever: :whatever:
 
Hulk didnt fly, he in no way looked like he flew :huh:... and the score is awesome :o
 
Yeah, so? Like minds can disagree. I think he looked like he was flying; you don't. Competing claims. What gives? You thought the score was awesome; I thought overall it was average. Am I supposed to roll over now? WTF, some of you act like it's your job to splatter your brains. :whatever: :dry:
 
Yeah, so? Like minds can disagree. I think he looked like he was flying; you don't. Competing claims. What gives? You thought the score was awesome; I thought overall it was average. Am I supposed to roll over now? WTF, some of you act like it's your job to splatter your brains. :whatever: :dry:

You must have the most unique vision of what flying is supposed to look like. I'm not saying that as an insult, I sincerely mean it, just because when most people envision a man shaped person flying they think...well...Superman.

In every movie instance where they display a man flying, it's always superman style. Horizontal to the ground and head facing forward. I've never seen a movie depict someone as perpendicular to the ground with his arms and legs held behind him (like people look when then jump) and present it as flying, because it looks awkward.

I'm not saying your wrong to think that the Hulk was flying, I just find it very odd, since most people, and all movies I've seen, depict flying men soaring through the air Superman style. This shows that they obviously have a mastery over gravity. The Hulk (though he stayed in the air for a very long time) looked like a person in mid jump. His feet faced the ground, not his stomach, and his arms and legs were cocked back like a person who had just leapt into the air.

He also did not descend gracefully (as someone who could fly would do, since they have mastery over gravity) but instead hit the ground very hard, just as someone who jumps would.

I guess my main point is, I thought it was quite obvious that he was jumping and not flying, and was obviously intended to be that way.
 
You must have the most unique vision of what flying is supposed to look like. I'm not saying that as an insult, I sincerely mean it, just because when most people envision a man shaped person flying they think...well...Superman.

Yeah, and most people don't take such comments to the extreme as you have. But you get the "least comprehending" award, right next to JKD, on this thread. And the "fanboy extraordinaire" award for using, well, another superhero to make your point.

Are you people simple or something? Obsessed with extremes? Fascinated by misguided criticism?

I'm not going to keep answering to this b.s. Consult post #157.
 
Wow.

I thought this thread was resolved? I mean, I don't think it can get any more resolved than the pseudo-scientific discussion that was had, other than real physicists with real calculations showing up in here telling all of us how stupid we are.

Anything other than that is arguing for the sake of arguing.
 
Wow.

I thought this thread was resolved? I mean, I don't think it can get any more resolved than the pseudo-scientific discussion that was had, other than real physicists with real calculations showing up in here telling all of us how stupid we are.

Anything other than that is arguing for the sake of arguing.

Nobody is arguing here. ;)
 
carrrnuttt, old friend, good to see you back.

Wow.

I thought this thread was resolved? I mean, I don't think it can get any more resolved than the pseudo-scientific discussion that was had, other than real physicists with real calculations showing up in here telling all of us how stupid we are.

Anything other than that is arguing for the sake of arguing.

No s***. That's what I thought. Good point though.
 
Yeah, so? Like minds can disagree. I think he looked like he was flying; you don't. Competing claims. What gives? You thought the score was awesome; I thought overall it was average. Am I supposed to roll over now? WTF, some of you act like it's your job to splatter your brains. :whatever: :dry:
umm...calm down, way to take things way too seriously. Like that other guy said, a person flying has always been like when Supes does it. I really dont see how you can think Hulk flew when it was clearly shown that he was jumping :huh:. Show me a scene when he loooks like he's flying, he's either going up or falling down. Never did he stay up in the air like he was flying.

About the score, thats fine by me, you didnt like it, i loved it. No one wants you to roll over :huh:... i thought we were having an arguement.
 
And I'm amazed you're still bossing me around after only coming back to the Hype a week ago. If you're not the pope, you must be my dad or perhaps a manager I didn't know I had. Dad, is that you?? Or something worse... Here he is folks, the Barron of Bloviation! The Earl of Wisdom! The Sultan of Superiority! :whatever:

Once again, it's in your failure to read my posts that your "amaze"ment lies. Everything I feel regarding this topic was summed up in the first full paragraph of post #157. I implore you to consult that post for whatever it is you're looking for. But I don't recall ever saying the desert scenes killed the movie. My problem was always with Hulk's jumping and, more to the point, the way it appeared on the screen.

I suppose you can point to my comment in post #26, "So, if you want another Hulk that fails in the box office, just keep having him leap from plateau to plateau... just like you want it," but that would only further show your ignorance. Yeah, I felt the "flying" contributed to the "borefest" that has been so used by people to describe the movie. And the Enya-esque soundbed, coupled with the philosopher Hulk contemplating his existence between battle sequences, didn't help. But you act like you've stumbled upon some rare observation. Well, what do you want, a gold star? A cookie? Hell, they might even let you ride on the BIG bus for observations like yours. :whatever: :whatever: :whatever:

I suppose if we keep this up long enough, we'll actually get you to talk about the movie instead of my post count. But then...if we talk about it long enough, my post count will be higher and then I'll have the "right" to talk about it. ;) (Internet forum "decorum" is so bizarre.)

The leaping is part of the desert scenes. A big part. The desert scenes of the one part of the movie that worked for most movie-goers. It was the one thing Ang did well. That's the one part of the movie when audience weren't bored. So I really don't think it's accurate to say the leaping "bored" anyone.

And after watching it again in this thread, it seems more than obvious he is jumping...not "flying". I have no idea how anyone could come to conclusion that he was flying. Reminds me of a thread I read once about dumb things people say in movie theaters. (This is not directed at you.) I heard someone tell someone else that Forest Gump invented the smiley face in real life. So I suppose nothing is out of the realm of possibility. Stupid is as stupid does. (Yes...I couldn't resist.)

If it needs to be more obvious he was leaping well that's something to talk about. But the Hulk leaps, Spidey swings, Superman flies. That's just the way it is. The TV show got it wrong. The Hulk is not a jogger.
 
Obviously most of you guys are massive comic book Hulk fans which is why the leaping and running seemed great to you. However, I think most ordinary people were watching the leaping and running, and were thinking 'why is he able to jump MILES?' It really does need to be toned down for the movie. I know its a comic book movie but those jumps were stupid.
 
Obviously most of you guys are massive comic book Hulk fans which is why the leaping and running seemed great to you. However, I think most ordinary people were watching the leaping and running, and were thinking 'why is he able to jump MILES?' It really does need to be toned down for the movie. I know its a comic book movie but those jumps were stupid.

Well yes, i spoke to a few people around the time who thought Hulk couldnt do that because of the T.V series.

Actually, MOST people i spoke to at the time just couldnt get their head around the fact that a big green man was wrestling tanks, etc. So i think the same may apply this time. Hopefully not though.
 
Well yes, i spoke to a few people around the time who thought Hulk couldnt do that because of the T.V series.

Actually, MOST people i spoke to at the time just couldnt get their head around the fact that a big green man was wrestling tanks, etc. So i think the same may apply this time. Hopefully not though.

Yeah while the TV series was great for it's time it limited The Hulk's strength to flexing a the screen and lifting up one side of a car. I think once in awhile he jumped over a 5ft fence. LOL There were alot of good things about that show and I'm happy they're using those elements in this film. I wish the comic book was more like how this film is gonna be.
 
Obviously most of you guys are massive comic book Hulk fans which is why the leaping and running seemed great to you. However, I think most ordinary people were watching the leaping and running, and were thinking 'why is he able to jump MILES?' It really does need to be toned down for the movie. I know its a comic book movie but those jumps were stupid.

I loved the jumping though I'm sure it's not gonna be such a big artistic thing in this film.
 
Leaping? I hope. Running 300 mph? I SINCERELY hope not! That looked ridiculous!

Couldn't agree more!!

The leaping is a MUST!!

But that 300 mph run, was so dumb looking...

HE IS BIG!!! Has anyone ever seen a body builder run like that? No, they take big long muscular strangs, as if their body is so big they need to take it slow.

The Hulk should take big long hard strands. He shouldn't run like the flash, small, quick, quiet steps.

They should be BIG and BOOMING...:)

--dk7
 
Couldn't agree more!!

The leaping is a MUST!!

But that 300 mph run, was so dumb looking...

HE IS BIG!!! Has anyone ever seen a body builder run like that? No, they take big long muscular strangs, as if their body is so big they need to take it slow.

The Hulk should take big long hard strands. He shouldn't run like the flash, small, quick, quiet steps.

They should be BIG and BOOMING...:)

--dk7

In the Hulk's defense he was running on sand...or sandstone. :) I'm sure he'll be much louder in NYC. ;)
 
In the Hulk's defense he was running on sand...or sandstone. :) I'm sure he'll be much louder in NYC. ;)

:)I knoooooooooow...But did you hear him in the first movie.

It made like a whisp sound, like his pants were rubbing back and forth really fast....THAT IS THE SOUND THE FLASH MAKES!!!

THe Hulk should be like....BOOM!.. BOOM!.. BOOM! ..BOOM! ..BOOM!

not...wspWSPwwspWSPwSPWSPwsp!! lol...:)

--dk7
 
Okay, so, since no one is willing to actually follow my train my thought as expressed in other posts I've made, I'll quote myself:

Ha, okay, so I'm willing to accept some other things in other movies that I normally do not question. I guess no special effect just appears so blatantly obviously artificial as Hulk's jumping, as portrayed in the first movie, to me. I LIKE the fact that he can jump great distances, but you know, for the average human, even 30+ feet would be better than most people. Give Hulk, say, a 100-foot arc and I think it still conveys his incredible strength, while maintaining an aura of believability. I want him to do things that we never see, yes - I don't wish to alienate Hulk fans by pushing for TIH producers to dial down on his abilities - but I want to think that such an event could actually happen, too. Essentially, just make it look better. That's my battle cry. Shorter jumps, rather bursts, with less "flying." And truly, I was able to enjoy the movie, regardless.

And I appeal to this newbie also:

Obviously most of you guys are massive comic book Hulk fans which is why the leaping and running seemed great to you. However, I think most ordinary people were watching the leaping and running, and were thinking 'why is he able to jump MILES?' It really does need to be toned down for the movie. I know its a comic book movie but those jumps were stupid.

^I would bold ALL of that.

The fact is I don't think the Hulk was """"""really""""""" """""""flying""""""". It was THE WAY IT WAS SHOWN THAT I DIDN'T LIKE. Not the jumping itself. Not the desert scenes altogether. Just the ridiculous way he bounds from plateau to plateau, springing from the ground as a flea does with minimal impact/affect to his surroundings. And the ESSENCE of it, with the wind blowing in his face, was that he was "flying" - NOT THAT HE WAS ACTUALLY FLYING.

I mean, did they really need to show us all of it? What if Peter Jackson had shown us how Kong gets from the island to America? It's the same principle. You don't show us everything and good directors KNOW THIS(!). You give us the goods in moderation and leave things to our imagination, as necessary. Tracing the Hulk's path across the radar/map or implying the "angry man" is moving at an incredible rate (while not showing it) would have been enough. Showing us everything, I thought, only contributed to the element of surprise/mystery about the Hulk being removed in wholesale. I mean, there we were... soaring alongside the Hulk's face in mid-air. I suppose if they were somehow able to show us just that one scene, it would've been cool, but instead they made it (his ability to travel via jumping) a focal point of the movie and admit it, it was dumb. Only fanboy purists thought it was cool. Every wife and every girlfriend was giggling or, worse yet, sleeping, and average Joe's were bored out of their wits.

Beyond that, the mechanics or the physics involving Hulk's jumps personally didn't jive for me. Carrrnuttt's point was that if Hulk's legs can support a mountain, then he should have no problem making jumps as they appeared in the movie. But all of us, AD included, seemed to agree that the ground should have - at the very least - suffered greater impact (both upon jumping and landing) and thus, I thought this freaking topic was resolved(!).

Sava, even you have said in other threads you thought Ang Lee had the perfect idea for the movie, but "didn't do it right." Are you suggesting that he somehow spot-on nailed the jumping aspect of Hulk in light of getting all/most of the rest of the movie wrong? Could it be that Ang - who confessed at the outset that he wasn't the right man for the job (source: hearsay on this forum) - didn't give us the best or even one of the best characterizations of the Hulk that could've been brought to bear?

Don't read into this too much: I loved the movie because I love the Hulk and I love Ang's effort, but damn... SOME things could've been done better. And with all of the aftermath... the overall poor box office performance ($132M revenue vs. $137M prod budget), the near-record 70% second-weekend dropoff, and today, people clamoring for a reboot - for TIH to distance itself as FAR away as possible from the first movie... are my points all that astounding? I mean, is it not the case that everyone we talk to outside of these forums CRINGE when they think of the first Hulk? If the jumping was so spot-on perfect, it only stands to reason that they would, at the very least, give the jumping honorable mention, right? NO, THEY WOULDN'T and this is what so many fanboys seem to overlook. NO ONE remembers how superior the jumping was as you all do.

About the score, thats fine by me, you didnt like it, i loved it. No one wants you to roll over ... i thought we were having an arguement.

The score... loved the opening credits, but hated how it transitioned to the laboratory. The piano, or whatever it was, was way overbearing. Also, actually, loved the Enya-esque backdrop when the helicopters are transporting Banner across the desert... but it eventually became overkill. Too much philosopher Hulk and the exotic music only reinforced it.

I suppose if we keep this up long enough, we'll actually get you to talk about the movie instead of my post count. But then...if we talk about it long enough, my post count will be higher and then I'll have the "right" to talk about it. (Internet forum "decorum" is so bizarre.)

Yes, you finally weakened me. lol Your post count is fine. I just don't like it when people think they're the new sheriff in town. Even less do I enjoy repeating myself and, let's face it, my hands were tied. You opened a can of worms and the rest was history.

If it needs to be more obvious he was leaping well that's something to talk about. But the Hulk leaps, Spidey swings, Superman flies. That's just the way it is. The TV show got it wrong. The Hulk is not a jogger.

But the TV show remains one of the best things going for the new movie, due to its popularity and the fact the TIH script has taken to a liking for the show's feel. You can say the show got it wrong, but the fact is Marvel wouldn't screw this up. They wouldn't chance a reboot that's geared toward the TV show if they didn't already know that a few million folks grew up loving the show. I myself, truly, do not care how it's done as long as it looks good... but something tells me we won't be seeing the Hulk go into a low-earth orbit again.
 
I had a mess of Jager Bombs over the weekend and I thought I could fly :oldrazz: :woot:
 
Sava, even you have said in other threads you thought Ang Lee had the perfect idea for the movie, but "didn't do it right." Are you suggesting that he somehow spot-on nailed the jumping aspect of Hulk in light of getting all/most of the rest of the movie wrong? Could it be that Ang - who confessed at the outset that he wasn't the right man for the job (source: hearsay on this forum) - didn't give us the best or even one of the best characterizations of the Hulk that could've been brought to bear?

Don't read into this too much: I loved the movie because I love the Hulk and I love Ang's effort, but damn... SOME things could've been done better. And with all of the aftermath... the overall poor box office performance ($132M revenue vs. $137M prod budget), the near-record 70% second-weekend dropoff, and today, people clamoring for a reboot - for TIH to distance itself as FAR away as possible from the first movie... are my points all that astounding? I mean, is it not the case that everyone we talk to outside of these forums CRINGE when they think of the first Hulk? If the jumping was so spot-on perfect, it only stands to reason that they would, at the very least, give the jumping honorable mention, right? NO, THEY WOULDN'T and this is what so many fanboys seem to overlook. NO ONE remembers how superior the jumping was as you all do.
I would hesitate to call anything Ang did "perfect"...so that itself may prove the jumping could have been done better. ;)

But the TV show remains one of the best things going for the new movie, due to its popularity and the fact the TIH script has taken to a liking for the show's feel. You can say the show got it wrong, but the fact is Marvel wouldn't screw this up. They wouldn't chance a reboot that's geared toward the TV show if they didn't already know that a few million folks grew up loving the show. I myself, truly, do not care how it's done as long as it looks good... but something tells me we won't be seeing the Hulk go into a low-earth orbit again.
That TV show is the bane of my existence. I don't even think it should have been called the Hulk. Hulk-light at most. Much better if it had failed and we wouldn't have audiences wondering where "David Banner" is and why the Hulk is able to lift something bigger than a VW Beetle. ("Where's the body builder with green body paint?") This is similar to the problem Superman would have if that 50s TV show had made him a jogger. I guess then fans in the first Chris Reeves movie would have wondered why he was flying.
 
Sava, even you have said in other threads you thought Ang Lee had the perfect idea for the movie, but "didn't do it right." Are you suggesting that he somehow spot-on nailed the jumping aspect of Hulk in light of getting all/most of the rest of the movie wrong? Could it be that Ang - who confessed at the outset that he wasn't the right man for the job (source: hearsay on this forum) - didn't give us the best or even one of the best characterizations of the Hulk that could've been brought to bear?
I dont think Ang ever said he wasnt the right guy for Hulk :huh:..where'd you hear that?. I think he said that he didnt know how to make a comicbook movie but he knew and wanted to make a greek tragedy. IMO, Hulk isnt a very comicbook-ish character anyway, atleast i dont see him that way, Yeah he's green and has alot of power and all that but that guy is a walking tragedy IMO and Ang was one of the perfect guys to bring that out in a way we havent seen before, I like the Spidey movies but they do nothing new, they just follow the rules and clichés . I didnt want that to be Hulk, i didnt want a follow the numbers and add in Hulk insted of Spidey and we'll get a great comicbook movie type of thing. I've always been a fan of Ang's and like the way he shows you a character without actually making you feel like "alright, this is the character development part, we'll get to the action in a min". I dont know if the makes sense or not, basically, he shows you the character in a different and IMO, better way than most directors.

Now, as to Ang's Hulk, he got a couple of things wrong, the height and the changing Hulk's, the first one, i agree with guys like CJ when it really wasnt necessary and just took you out of the moment when you saw him next to people. The changing Hulk's, i love that, that makes him more real IMO, the Hulk grows, he isnt born a middle ages guy, he's actually born, he was a baby in the first Hulk out and by the end of the movie he was a full grown man, and he'll only kepp gettting stronger cause Hulk doesnt get old. Ang's should have made that part more clearer IMO and people would have gotten it and liked it. He didnt, you had to watch that making of part from the dvds and listen to Ang's commentary to get all of that.

Apart for all of that, IMO, Ang got the hulk spot on. His hulk acted the way i thought he would, Hulk showed a s**tload of emotion and you got that he wanted to be alone, that he hated Banner, that he thinks constantly of his mother and the guy has a animalistic side without him saying ANYTHING. IMO, thats what makes a great character, if he can show you all of that without talking. One of my fav non action scenes in teh movie is when Betty walks down some steps in san fran and Hulk looks at her and nearly starts crying, that scene is amazing IMO, Ang shot that scene perfectly IMO, I dont think Hulk was looking at Betty, i think he was looking at his mother, thats why you get the puupy dog eyes and he nearly starts crying when he sees her again.


Don't read into this too much: I loved the movie because I love the Hulk and I love Ang's effort, but damn... SOME things could've been done better. And with all of the aftermath... the overall poor box office performance ($132M revenue vs. $137M prod budget), the near-record 70% second-weekend dropoff, and today, people clamoring for a reboot - for TIH to distance itself as FAR away as possible from the first movie... are my points all that astounding? I mean, is it not the case that everyone we talk to outside of these forums CRINGE when they think of the first Hulk? If the jumping was so spot-on perfect, it only stands to reason that they would, at the very least, give the jumping honorable mention, right? NO, THEY WOULDN'T and this is what so many fanboys seem to overlook. NO ONE remembers how superior the jumping was as you all do.
yeah some things could have been done better, Ang could have started that movie a different way and they could have used the comicbook origin. Hulk's action was fine IMO and here in SHH when someone makes polls of Marvel action sequences, its gets its fair share of votes and such. The thing is, people outside dont talk about the action cause it was few and far in between.



The score... loved the opening credits, but hated how it transitioned to the laboratory. The piano, or whatever it was, was way overbearing. Also, actually, loved the Enya-esque backdrop when the helicopters are transporting Banner across the desert... but it eventually became overkill. Too much philosopher Hulk and the exotic music only reinforced it.
I loved the opening credits too but i didnt find the socre after that to be overbearing, i loved the whole of the transport sequence.
 
With smallville running for so long, it's made me wonder why marvel can't produce it's own version, with a modernised hulk tv show..

sure it'd still be a man in a suit but the spedcial effects would make his feats far more spectacular. It'd be incredibly expensive but having his journey take him across america and europe meeting different scientists, heroes and villains, it could make a fortune on ratings...

and unlike smallville that feels like its dragging, the hulk series will always feel fresh because there isn't a superhero for him to eventually turn into

lots of potential there but could be very expensive.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"