Will Spidey 3 be the Batman&Robin of the series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bushgeneration
  • Start date Start date
bushgeneration said:
Schumacher's Batman&Robin was quite overcrowded with characters, so there was no character development. Bad acting. Incoherence in general. Spidey 3 runs the risk of following the same path if Raimi loses his focus on the characters rather than the spectacle. Spectacle is great if it has substance.

Disagree for the following reasons.

No change in director.

Main cast is back and the new additions are very good actors. Church, Bryce, Cromwell etc are dead ringers for the characters they are playing.

Plenty of time has been set aside for production and filming. No lousy schedules unlike with what happened with X3.

Sandman and Brock will be developed unlike Bane. Plus Harry, Peter, and MJ have gotten characterization from the previous 2 movies.
 
Shoemeister said:
It's a damn shame that sarcasm is such a lost art.
Believe me my friend, good humor falls on deaf ears around here.
Actually isn't it refered to as the lowest form of wit?
 
x-men 3 was the BatmanAndRobin of the seriers, and i doubt spider-man 3 will become that too
 
Spider-Man 3 will not be the B&R of the series.

Look at it this way. Spider-Man has built up most of the characters in the franchise, yet Batman did not do that. They either had a different storyline or the actors didn't return.

The Villians- Some of the actors who played the villians didn't portray the character as good. They really just didn't live up to the expectation to the character. Spider-Man has done that great.

The Sequels- The first two Batman did great because it focused on Batman and the villians. You get to the next installments and you bring in Robin and Batgirl. Just a huge mistake to do that. Thats why bringing in Black Cat might have ruined it to some extent.

Now look at SM3- They have built up the Characters in every movie. They have the same storyline going through and all the actors our returning. The actors who played the villians did an outstanding job because they were given Homework to do. Info on the character and they were given the comic in which there character played.

These are just some of the reasons why I believe that it will not be the Batman and Robin of the series.
 
NewYorkSpider said:
Spider-Man 3 will not be the B&R of the series.

Look at it this way. Spider-Man has built up most of the characters in the franchise, yet Batman did not do that. They either had a different storyline or the actors didn't return.

The Villians- Some of the actors who played the villians didn't portray the character as good. They really just didn't live up to the expectation to the character. Spider-Man has done that great.

The Sequels- The first two Batman did great because it focused on Batman and the villians. You get to the next installments and you bring in Robin and Batgirl. Just a huge mistake to do that. Thats why bringing in Black Cat might have ruined it to some extent.

Now look at SM3- They have built up the Characters in every movie. They have the same storyline going through and all the actors our returning. The actors who played the villians did an outstanding job because they were given Homework to do. Info on the character and they were given the comic in which there character played.

These are just some of the reasons why I believe that it will not be the Batman and Robin of the series.

actually, the first two batman films barely focused on batman at all. it was all about the villians. i mean...Batman should've been called The Joker, and nicholson was even billed before keaton. they were definitely better than the last two films, of course.

also, robin and batgirl were the LEAST of batman and robin's problems.
 
Super Flight said:
x-men 3 was the BatmanAndRobin of the seriers
I actually thought it was easily the best one.
 
DACMAN said:
I actually thought it was easily the best one.

ehhh. i disagree. i enjoyed it, but it was the weakest entry story-wise. also, all the build-up of angel, juggernaut, beast, colossus, and the other newbies was completely unnecessary and a waste of time, cause they were only in the film for eye-candy purposes.

it was a cool story concept, with the cure and everything, but ratner did not pull it off well.

just my two cents. :xmen:
 
bushgeneration said:
Schumacher's Batman&Robin was quite overcrowded with characters, so there was no character development. Bad acting. Incoherence in general. Spidey 3 runs the risk of following the same path if Raimi loses his focus on the characters rather than the spectacle. Spectacle is great if it has substance.

Your comparison was great right up to the moment you said "Schumacher":rolleyes: :p
 
avclub_review66.article.jpg


LOLzzzzzz!
 
Visionary said:
I wish I had 'A Time To Kill' Schumacher.:O

It seems that whenever there's an angry fanboy around, bringing up the Batman & Robin movie can't be too far behind. What's the matter now, your feeling are hurt, you're not getting what you want and you feel ignored by the director, writers and studio? Well good, this just means that your opinions to them doesn't matter, exactly the way it should be. Stay home and you don't have to worry about anything, but you know you won't.:o
You've always been so negative. What's up with that? Wanna talk about it? And I think your dead wrong that the studios think our opinions "don't matter". For a few reasons. One we buy the ticket. We pay their bills. And two, we've heard many times that production companies come here to see what fans are saying.
 
theShape said:
ehhh. i disagree. i enjoyed it, but it was the weakest entry story-wise. also, all the build-up of angel, juggernaut, beast, colossus, and the other newbies was completely unnecessary and a waste of time, cause they were only in the film for eye-candy purposes.

it was a cool story concept, with the cure and everything, but ratner did not pull it off well.

just my two cents. :xmen:
I totally agree about Juggernaunt. I think they totally screwed him up.

I have a few buddies that sade almost the same think about Ratner. But I was think about how he and his team of writers has to finish up a three part story that some one else started. I think with that in mind he did a great job. I also know that I'm in the minority in the way he handled the Phoenix. I kept thinking how they were they going to pull off aliens and the whole deal and finish up the story with Magneto. But I think he did a great job. I think it was easily better than the first. The second was great so IMO I think it could be argued which was better 2 or 3.
 
theShape said:
also, all the build-up of angel, juggernaut, beast, colossus, and the other newbies was completely unnecessary and a waste of time

I must agree with you on Angel. No use other than effects. I mean the whole thing with his father, yeah, whatever, but he had like no lines or development. Otherwise, I loved the movie.

Anyway, back on topic... *~*HI FREEZE IM BATMAN OMG LOLZ*~* :rolleyes:
 
I'm not even going to read the replies because I hope you all said...NO! It will not ever come close to that piece of crap...end of thread.
 
I really need to watch Batman & Robin again just to have a few good laughs.I must've been about 7 when it came out and all I can remember is Batbikes and an ice laser or something like that.The thing about the Batman movies is that the quality decreased with every film,and they had different actors play the hero.SM3 has an all-star cast with a solid director who hasn't IMO let us down yet.The only similarity between the two is that they're both comic book films but they're far different in that aspect as well.
 
lol, why are people still posting in this thread? The only way Spiderman 3 could even come close to being as bad as Batman and Robin is if Joel Schumacher replaced all the copies of Spiderman 3 with copies of Batman and Robin.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,265
Messages
22,075,535
Members
45,875
Latest member
shanandrews
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"