Spider-man was light summer blockbuster, which told realistic story of one of the most popular superheroes at nowadays. Overall, it still looks fresh and well made.
But what about flaws?
Script had not so good dialogues and also, GG got too much of storytelling. Peter Parker (not Spidey) should always stay as central characters of events in the movies.
Cast was great and I liked it, but I thought Tobey and Dunst could work much better.
There was too much action scenes, what really didn't help the movie. The only thing, which was showed except action is love story. Yeah, every movie must have love story. But I thought there should have been told more about Parker as Spidey (the balance of two faces).
Fight scenes. It wasn't the best aspect of the movie and I was a bit disappointed. Fights between Spidey and GG (except that awesome battle after bridge sequence) didn't look so exciting. It was like two old men trying to beat each other. I wanted GG to be more flexible and the same with Spidey. It just felt like fights in Burton's Batman movies, what didn't work well.
The main villian (Green Goblin) had one of the worst suits ever. This is truth. Raimi should have gone with more Goblin-ish style than Power Rangers usual suit.
Yeah, this movie is for all ages. But it seemed like it was film for kids, not teens. There were too childish scenes (like Goblin's songs or other campyt scenes).
But as I said before, Spidey 1 is still classic for most of people.
Spider-man 2 was one of the best sequels and just awesome movie. It had very intersting development of characters and it also learnt some mistakes of 1st movie.
But what didn't work?
Movie had simple storytelling, which had 1st movie. There wasn't anything new or at least unexpected.
It looked like Superman II. Yeah I can understand that Raimi used exact this franchise for making Spidey movies, but tehre also should have been something from him as the director.
That's all I think.
Now Spider-man 3, the main part of the franchise.
It looks very dark, very effective and very different from previous movies.
Dialogues feel better (from what i have already seen) and this time there will be new strategy of storytelling as I guess.
But Spidey 3 (like every another Spidey movie) looks also a bit like Superman III (god, I still hope it will be great movie, even if it has something from SIII). I want to see somethg new from Raimi, which wasn't showed in any another usual superhero movie and I have feeling I will.
Also, I don't want this movie to have too much action, which can very hurt it. 3 villians. Yeah, I know how it will work, but still, isn't there too much action? I just don't want another X3 film.
So what you think about it? How different will Spidey 3 look from previous movies?
But what about flaws?
Script had not so good dialogues and also, GG got too much of storytelling. Peter Parker (not Spidey) should always stay as central characters of events in the movies.
Cast was great and I liked it, but I thought Tobey and Dunst could work much better.
There was too much action scenes, what really didn't help the movie. The only thing, which was showed except action is love story. Yeah, every movie must have love story. But I thought there should have been told more about Parker as Spidey (the balance of two faces).
Fight scenes. It wasn't the best aspect of the movie and I was a bit disappointed. Fights between Spidey and GG (except that awesome battle after bridge sequence) didn't look so exciting. It was like two old men trying to beat each other. I wanted GG to be more flexible and the same with Spidey. It just felt like fights in Burton's Batman movies, what didn't work well.
The main villian (Green Goblin) had one of the worst suits ever. This is truth. Raimi should have gone with more Goblin-ish style than Power Rangers usual suit.
Yeah, this movie is for all ages. But it seemed like it was film for kids, not teens. There were too childish scenes (like Goblin's songs or other campyt scenes).
But as I said before, Spidey 1 is still classic for most of people.
Spider-man 2 was one of the best sequels and just awesome movie. It had very intersting development of characters and it also learnt some mistakes of 1st movie.
But what didn't work?
Movie had simple storytelling, which had 1st movie. There wasn't anything new or at least unexpected.
It looked like Superman II. Yeah I can understand that Raimi used exact this franchise for making Spidey movies, but tehre also should have been something from him as the director.
That's all I think.
Now Spider-man 3, the main part of the franchise.
It looks very dark, very effective and very different from previous movies.
Dialogues feel better (from what i have already seen) and this time there will be new strategy of storytelling as I guess.
But Spidey 3 (like every another Spidey movie) looks also a bit like Superman III (god, I still hope it will be great movie, even if it has something from SIII). I want to see somethg new from Raimi, which wasn't showed in any another usual superhero movie and I have feeling I will.
Also, I don't want this movie to have too much action, which can very hurt it. 3 villians. Yeah, I know how it will work, but still, isn't there too much action? I just don't want another X3 film.
So what you think about it? How different will Spidey 3 look from previous movies?