It's a fine theory. Definitely sound. But I'm confused by thorstone and the other guy. The objective fact is that the two are analyzing what appears to be, from one film and are ultimately reaching a speculative conclusion that can't be confirmed. It's a subjective analysis (which in itself doesn't hold a lot of validity in an argument) , regardless of how sound it is, all it is, is a theory, yet these two seem to genuinely chalk it up to a fact that they are so totally sure of. What they said is most definitely possible, and makes a lot of sense, but it's all analysis and speculation. I would tone down the bit of condescending "we're right and how can no one else see that" attitude, comes off kinda rude And suggests their opinions are personal as well as other things..
Sorry, had to say it as least challenging as possible