Serene said:
I think there still remains an assumption that the majority of people here in the SV forum would rather have seen Tom in SR. Careful reading of posts would show that to be untrue. The SR casting wars ended a long time ago. Just because there are people who are disappointed with the movie (and this is from both sides of the SV fence) doesn't equate to being pissed that Tom wasn't in *that* movie.
However, wanting to see Tom don the suit in his own version of a Superman movie of some sorts is still something that many of us would dearly love to see.
There is a distinction that is hopelessly lost on a lot of people. I guess it's easier to fall back on old assumptions and fling accusations to continue the animosity between SV fans and non-SV fans.
Might want to cut and past that post for future use, Serene. Seems as if it has to be said at least once a week.
Michael, you and
Pickle are sounding a bit stressed today, though the Pickster seems to have a viable reason for it [hope ya feel better, Pickle.]
With all due respect, don't tell folks here to grow up; I probably have a good 15 years on you as it is. If you have a bone to pick with somebody, address 'em directly. You have a better chance of eliciting a "mature" conversation if you offer counter points to the things you don't agree with instead of indiscriminately lobbing insults into the ether and inciting an entire board.
I've already said my peace on this issue, but I'll reiterate and elaborate for clarity. While I would have preferred a SV film over SR, in retrospect, I wouldn't have wanted it to be at the expense of the show, and I most certainly wouldn't have wanted it to be the story we got, only with the SV cast. Looking back, my ultimate preference would have been to wait till SV finished its run (last episode, Clark dons the tights, flies off into the sunset, credits roll) and then have the film franchise begin where SV left off, complete with associated cast.
I use the phrases "looking back" and "in retrospect" because I have the benefit of hindsight now. Some people in this forum [raises hand] took to describing SR as a "train wreck" in the making over a year ago. But up until a few weeks ago, nobody really knew with 100% confidence how good or bad the film would be, both critically and popularly. Any comments made could easily be deflected with a simple, "wait till you see the bloody film" retort. Well, I've seen it. And I was woefully disappointed.
There was no joy in watching this film. Too much shmaltzy nostalgia, too many "WTF? I've seen this before?" moments, no thumpity thump romantic sizzle between the leads, a ridiculous "plot," no humor (with the exception of *maybe* two lines and one brief scene), and a dreadful performance by the lead actor, which ironically enough, became glaringly obvious when I had another recent performance to compare it to during the film's Smallville scenes *cough* when Clark spoke with Martha on the farm. Of ALL the scenes that were rumored to be left on the cutting room floor, that one at the beginning should have been at the top of the list. Kinda makes me wonder what WAS ditched. Anyhoo, did I mention the film had a complete lack of joy? [looks back] Oh yeah, I covered that already. Well sheeit... it bears repeating: SR should have been THE amazing feel good movie of the summer, but it just wasn't. *siiigh*
^ All subjective opinions up there, right? Yeah, no doubt, especially when one considers that PROFESSIONAL critics from the likes of Variety and HP would disagree with me. (I'll avoid mentioning Ebert.) Oopz! Guess I just did.
Forget the critics. Lets look at the concrete reality. Remember, there's a REASON it's called show
business, not show entertainment. The general public shows Hollywood what they like and what they don't when they vote with their wallets. Call me crazy, but there's something DREADFULLY wrong when a *sequel* to a film based on a Disney theme park ride wipes the floors with a 200+ million dollar franchise film about the greatest superhero ever written, directed by Bryan freakin' Singer! Look back at all my old posts in the B.O. threads over yonder. I predicted SR would make back its production budget easily and might even break a few records in the process, even if the critics didn't particularly care for it. Geeze, looks like my crystal ball was off target by about one week. And y'know what? That really embarrasses me, 'cause I fancy myself pretty "savvy" *cough* in B.O. banter around the coffee table. Lets not even bring up the total shellacking SR has taken in per theater averages alone under the heels *cough* of a silly comedy that came out of nowhere.
At this rate, SR won't make back its PB at the domestic B.O. It'll be lucky to break $200M, and it might even struggle to do that. That's pathetic. Really, it is. Warners wanted Spider-Man numbers with this flick. Even the *remake* of The Fog, a PG-13 rated "horror" film, made back its PB in NINE days at the domestic B.O. - and that was with a quarter less screens and a 43% drop-off in its sophomore sesh. It was critically panned, had ZERO "name" stars, a "ZERO" director, and it was released in the fall when all the kids were back to school. Oh yeah, and it opened at #1 even though it shared its release date with a film that had twice its PB and starred Orlando Bloom. *cough*
Apples and oranges? Well yeah, sort of. But c'mon folks. I was one of the people touting the "It's Superman" mantra over yonder. "It'll do well," I said. Many, many times.
Yet again...