Would You Have Prefered a Smallville Movie?

Would You Have Prefered a Smallville Movie?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
AgentPat said:
:confused:

Um... I think you've got it reversed. Shouldn't you be asking the dissenters that question? Here, lemme help...

Nah, how about I help out as well? :)

Proceeds to stir the pot...........

Does it bother YOU that a $204M blockbuster film *about* Superman is apparently less popular with mass audiences than a popcorn film based on a Disney theme park ride, or a hackneyed comedy about working for a hard-nosed fashionista?

I guess I won't be quiet anymore.....:)

I'll give you Pirates obviously, but the other one hasn't even made $100m yet. Don't mention budgets, we're talking totals here, which in the end, means POPULARITY, correct?

Does it bother YOU that the only film the TV show actor headlined made back its production budget at the domestic B.O. in NINE days, while a film directed by Bryan-X-Men-Singer can't seem to do the same without divine intervention?

Selma Blair was the only name in the film with Tom Welling being moderately known. This so-called "hit" of yours made a lousy $29.5m domestically at the box office, hardly something to go off bragging about. It was out of theatres in 6 weeks and was critically panned with an impressive 6% over at RT. We all know SR's budget was out of hand, and it didn't need to be that high, especially when viewing the final product. If it was anywhere near a "normal" high profile film budget, we wouldn't be talking about profitability problems, which it won't have in the end anyway after it's all said and done.

Does it bother YOU that the actor who was chosen to headline the film can't act his way out of a phone booth, never less do a shirt rip in one?

Well, this is obviously your opinion, but IMO, this actor has more presence than TW could ever have. The shirt rip thing was Singer's fault, not the actor's fault.

Does it bother YOU that at least four names in the "no" list above (Hal Jordan 8472, Hollywoodland, Silver Lad and Vandal Savage) are the same person?

No, it doesn't bother me since we're sitting here on a SV board - of course it will lean one way. Again, no, SV belongs where it is, in it's nice little spot on TV with it's small audience.
 
regardless of SR's bloated budget, the fact that we're debating whether or not a Superman movie will be able to limp it's way to $200 million domestic sometime around Labor Day Weekend if it's lucky, is in and of itself embarassing.
 
does it bother anyone other than me that we sv-ites have to constantly endure sr-ites coming to our forum praising sr when we obviously dont care?
 
Kaboom said:
does it bother anyone other than me that we sv-ites have to constantly endure sr-ites coming to our forum praising sr when we obviously dont care?

Amen to that brother. :up:
 
Kaboom said:
does it bother anyone other than me that we sv-ites have to constantly endure sr-ites coming to our forum praising sr when we obviously dont care?

I can understand your feelings. I hope I'm not obnoxious about it, cause it seems like I talk about it a lot. :O
 
TKodami said:
I can understand your feelings. I hope I'm not too obnoxious about it. :O

TK, youre awesome. I have no problem with discussing the movie reasonably and intellectually.

What i do dislike, is the fact that some individuals posts are ALWAYS about the superiority of their SR compared to the inferiority of SV because "thats just how it is" or something to that effect.

i myself moderately enjoyed SR, and have said as much. Obviously i am also a fan of SV. BUt let me return to my french fry debate. If i like McDs fries, you are not going to convince me that BK's are better simply because You like BK's more. Moreover, it is inconsequential to me whetehr or not i think one brand of fries has a better taste based on McDs or BKs profit margin in producing them for consumption.
 
TKodami said:
I can understand your feelings. I hope I'm not obnoxious about it, cause it seems like I talk about it a lot. :O

Well I cant speak for Kaboom, but you are in no way obnoxious about it, in fact you rarely do talk about it.

I think it just gets extremely frustrating that when you're in a Smallville Forum you have to have posters bringing down Smallville in order to up SR.
 
Kaboom said:
TK, youre awesome. I have no problem with discussing the movie reasonably and intellectually.

Hehehe, well thanks for that. I honestly can't tell how often I talk about it here, because I'm thinking about it all the time, lol. :O

What i do dislike, is the fact that some individuals posts are ALWAYS about the superiority of their SR compared to the inferiority of SV because "thats just how it is" or something to that effect.

i myself moderately enjoyed SR, and have said as much. Obviously i am also a fan of SV. BUt let me return to my french fry debate. If i like McDs fries, you are not going to convince me that BK's are better simply because You like BK's more. Moreover, it is inconsequential to me whetehr or not i think one brand of fries has a better taste based on McDs or BKs profit margin in producing them for consumption.

I completely understand there. I remember back in the day when the RotS fanboys tried to convince me that I liked Episode III. I like talking about movies, but at the end of the day, this movie was too emotionally polarizing to have rational discussion on either side. That and RotS was easily the worst movie of 2005.

Conversely, I really don't enjoy the threads over at BlueTights where posters start bashing SV, or just making a derrogatory passing comment about it. It really riles me up, but I don't want to have to fight the entire board over an opinion that won't change.

avidreader said:
I think it just gets extremely frustrating that when you're in a Smallville Forum you have to have posters bringing down Smallville in order to up SR.

Sometimes, I just don't get it. How can they watch the pilot and say that this is a bad show? The pilot is an amazing piece of television--some of the best I've ever seen. And trust me, I've seen a lot of television in my 21 years on this planet. :D
 
This arguement is getting kind of old.

I understand Milkman's points, but I dont really want to get into a long drawn out debate over how one film detracted from another's audience, or my thoughts on The Fog.

besides Hulk got it right:

The Incredible Hulk said:
regardless of SR's bloated budget, the fact that we're debating whether or not a Superman movie will be able to limp it's way to $200 million domestic sometime around Labor Day Weekend if it's lucky, is in and of itself embarassing.

With SR's budget and how it was being touted the movie should have done better. Why didnt it? When Spider-man opened in May of '02 it got $403 million that year, followed by Star Wars II which got $310. So what does this prove? Better movies win out, and As Hulk said if SR was better than it is/was we wouldnt be having a discussion.

Insert Merry-Go-Round
 
AgentPat said:
:confused:

Um... I think you've got it reversed. Shouldn't you be asking the dissenters that question? Here, lemme help...

Does it bother YOU that a $204M blockbuster film *about* Superman is apparently less popular with mass audiences than a popcorn film based on a Disney theme park ride, or a hackneyed comedy about working for a hard-nosed fashionista?

Does it bother YOU that the only film the TV show actor headlined made back its production budget at the domestic B.O. in NINE days, while a film directed by Bryan-X-Men-Singer can't seem to do the same without divine intervention?

Does it bother YOU that the actor who was chosen to headline the film can't act his way out of a phone booth, never less do a shirt rip in one?

Does it bother YOU that at least four names in the "no" list above (Hal Jordan 8472, Hollywoodland, Silver Lad and Vandal Savage) are the same person?


This is great, I'd like to know how this has anything to do with what was originally posted. :o

(whistles)

Or, does it automatically go back to that when someone says Smallville isn't good enough to be a major motion picture?
 
Milkman95 said:
Nah, how about I help out as well? :)

Proceeds to stir the pot...........



I guess I won't be quiet anymore.....:)

I'll give you Pirates obviously, but the other one hasn't even made $100m yet. Don't mention budgets, we're talking totals here, which in the end, means POPULARITY, correct?



Selma Blair was the only name in the film with Tom Welling being moderately known. This so-called "hit" of yours made a lousy $29.5m domestically at the box office, hardly something to go off bragging about. It was out of theatres in 6 weeks and was critically panned with an impressive 6% over at RT. We all know SR's budget was out of hand, and it didn't need to be that high, especially when viewing the final product. If it was anywhere near a "normal" high profile film budget, we wouldn't be talking about profitability problems, which it won't have in the end anyway after it's all said and done.



Well, this is obviously your opinion, but IMO, this actor has more presence than TW could ever have. The shirt rip thing was Singer's fault, not the actor's fault.



No, it doesn't bother me since we're sitting here on a SV board - of course it will lean one way. Again, no, SV belongs where it is, in it's nice little spot on TV with it's small audience.

Oh!

And there's the reaction some people were looking for.....

See, it's no more fun posting on the Smallville forums than it is the SR forums these days. :o

Dang, I might have to hang out in community a little more often. :eek:
 
Shampoo is better.

No, conditioner is better.
 
I hate everyone on this forum....so I won't be around for at least an hour or 2 as I work out.

Gotta go 'Hulk' up.....:o
 
Pickle-El said:
I hate everyone on this forum....so I won't be around for at least an hour or 2 as I work out.

Gotta go 'Hulk' up.....:o

Aww, I like you Pickle-El. Enjoy your workout. :p
 
Pickle-El said:
I hate everyone on this forum....

Gee thanks... didnt realise I had ever said anything to you that would make you hate me. Whatever...?
 
avidreader said:
Gee thanks... didnt realise I had ever said anything to you that would make you hate me. Whatever...?


Doesn't it make you feel all warm and fuzzy Avid...?:) :rolleyes:
 
Brainiac 8 said:
Doesn't it make you feel all warm and fuzzy Avid...?:) :rolleyes:

Absolutely!


You know......

What the world needs now is love, sweet love
It's the only thing that there's just too little of
What the world needs now is love, sweet love,
No not just for some but for everyone.
 
This is getting old. Can someone please close this thread as I'm the one that started it to begin with?

Next time, do an IP check before jumping to conclusions. MJD isnt Kane.:rolleyes: I just talked to him on aim, he only uses hollywoodland, the mods closed the others.
 
avidreader said:
Absolutely!


You know......

What the world needs now is love, sweet love
It's the only thing that there's just too little of
What the world needs now is love, sweet love,
No not just for some but for everyone.

whats love got to do with it?
whats love but a second hand emotion?
whats love got to do with it?
who needs a heart when a heart can be broken?
 
avidreader said:
Absolutely!


You know......

What the world needs now is love, sweet love
It's the only thing that there's just too little of
What the world needs now is love, sweet love,
No not just for some but for everyone.


burt_press_photo.jpg
:up:
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"