The Avengers Would you like to see Giant-Man in Avengers?

Would you like to see Giant-Man in Avengers?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Bruce Banner's no slouch, either

yeah. totally forgot bruce

From what I've heard we won't be seeing much Bruce in the avengers - I hope we do. Maybe I just heard wrong.... I'll fix that right fast.

what's the difference between the scientist and the brains? both sound very cerebral...
(and let's not forget: tony stark is a very bright person too)

Tony is more of an inventor, while Pym is more of the scientist - And Vision is much like Jarvis.
 
In the recent Mighty Avengers (during Dark Reign or Siege) They established the differences between Pym, Stark, Richards, and Banner
Reed is the explorer
Stark is the engineer
Banner (?) the tormented scientist or something (I don't know)
and Pym was named as the Scientist Supreme

Not because he is smarter than the others, but because he works to make the impossible possible, Richards explores and discovers things (although he always invented things to save the day in the past), Stark builds inventions,
Pym invents things, explores things, and uses all sort of science (genetics, chemistry, engineering, so on) to make impossible things happen.

So I guess in the movie Stark is the inventor, while Pym is the all around scientist that dabbles in everything from engineering, chemistry, genetics, and so on.
In the movie he shouldn't be smarter than Stark though, he should be somewhat over looked, with being on a team with Stark who is a super genius, hansom, rich, and loved by all. He feels inferior to him. But that shouldn't be presented right up front.
It could be slightly hinted at a little. Then expand on it in the sequals, showing that Pym feels inferior to everyone on the team.
 
That was during the Unspoken arc, a few months before "Siege". Eternity explained the whole "Scientist Supreme" thing to him based on what you described, mentioned Richards and Stark having more limited roles as scientists. Banner wasn't mentioned. Then he kicked him and told him to stop whining about being so put upon.
 
In the recent Mighty Avengers (during Dark Reign or Siege) They established the differences between Pym, Stark, Richards, and Banner
Reed is the explorer
Stark is the engineer
Banner (?) the tormented scientist or something (I don't know)
and Pym was named as the Scientist Supreme

Not because he is smarter than the others, but because he works to make the impossible possible, Richards explores and discovers things (although he always invented things to save the day in the past), Stark builds inventions,
Pym invents things, explores things, and uses all sort of science (genetics, chemistry, engineering, so on) to make impossible things happen.

So I guess in the movie Stark is the inventor, while Pym is the all around scientist that dabbles in everything from engineering, chemistry, genetics, and so on.
In the movie he shouldn't be smarter than Stark though, he should be somewhat over looked, with being on a team with Stark who is a super genius, hansom, rich, and loved by all. He feels inferior to him. But that shouldn't be presented right up front.
It could be slightly hinted at a little. Then expand on it in the sequals, showing that Pym feels inferior to everyone on the team.

That's how I see it working out :up::up:
 
I voted NO because I don't want to see budget wasted on a giant. It's too hard to pull off and tell a reasonable story. I LOVE Hank Pym and know he needs to be in the film but not as Giant-Man. He should graduate from Ant-Man right to Yellowjacket IMO.
 
Yellowjacket is not a character that can be either faithfully, or realistically transferred to live action. And he represents the worst aspect of Pym's psyche.
 
I only want to see Ant-Man & Giant-Man & no Yellowjacket or Goalith.
 
In the recent Mighty Avengers (during Dark Reign or Siege) They established the differences between Pym, Stark, Richards, and Banner
Reed is the explorer
Stark is the engineer
Banner (?) the tormented scientist or something (I don't know)
and Pym was named as the Scientist Supreme

Not because he is smarter than the others, but because he works to make the impossible possible, Richards explores and discovers things (although he always invented things to save the day in the past), Stark builds inventions,
Pym invents things, explores things, and uses all sort of science (genetics, chemistry, engineering, so on) to make impossible things happen.

So I guess in the movie Stark is the inventor, while Pym is the all around scientist that dabbles in everything from engineering, chemistry, genetics, and so on.
In the movie he shouldn't be smarter than Stark though, he should be somewhat over looked, with being on a team with Stark who is a super genius, hansom, rich, and loved by all. He feels inferior to him. But that shouldn't be presented right up front.
It could be slightly hinted at a little. Then expand on it in the sequals, showing that Pym feels inferior to everyone on the team.

I've never seen Stark in the same category as Pym and Richards because to me he's more of a builder and a businessman. It's just a rocket suit, after all.

That said, it's interesting to define what every Marvel egg heads are all about. Maybe Pym could be the "perfector". Like use what others have done and make something even better. Like use the dimensional capabilities found in space travels from the FF and the mutagenic aspect of gamma radiation that were able to make Banner change size with a new source of energy and come up with his size changing formula. Use Stark's super advanced abilities in computer engenering "his Jarvis, his armor, etc..) to create artificial intelligence aka Ultron and later on maybe Vision(?).
 
i wanted giant man in the avengers. wish he was gonna be in it.
 
i wanted giant man in the avengers. wish he was gonna be in it.
Me too. I want the original members in the first movie. They can add Hawkeye etc in the next movie. But to have no Ant-man or Giantman ticks me off. Cap didn't even show up until issue 4.
 
Me too. I want the original members in the first movie. They can add Hawkeye etc in the next movie. But to have no Ant-man or Giantman ticks me off. Cap didn't even show up until issue 4.

yea i would much rather see giant man instead of hawkeye.
 
I feel so bad for Giant-Man right now. Considering he's a C-lister at best, Avengers was probably his best chance for mass media exposure.
 
Ironically, I would have preferred Renner as Pym over Hawkeye (but perhaps not one character particularly over the other as far as being featured in the film.)
 
i just wanted the avengers to be the original avengers. marvel did all this work and now they are subbing in people. instead of bw and hawkeye they should have introduced the pyms. would have been the best time. then people would be interested for their movie.
 
well one thing about the avengers is it has a ton of members, so they can make alot of them and just change out members.
 
yeah they can change the way how the team starts in anyway they want....oh hank and the wasp were one of the first members....i cant hear that anymore...really they chose a different origin story for the hulk as well there was someone else who killed batmans parents.
these are personas who even change in the comicbooks...and im not only talking bout different stories but also their character as well...

and this.....

is f****** marvel

and not some other ''studio''(f*x)
 
I have no problem Hank starting out as a SHIELD scientist. In the original stories, research scientists seemed to just have personal labs set up in their own private facilities. And I'm pretty sure Hank was never a professor somewhere. So he has to get his funding somewhere, and if it aint academia, I'm absolutely fine it being a government oversight research facility. That at least gives an easy in without messing with the 616 back story too much.
 
but the messed with his character by not including him in the avengers original roster. he was always self conscious about his role in the team, he never felt he was a worthy choice to be among these superheroes, not to mention a god. no matter where he goes or what team he was on he always felt like that. at least he could say he was a founding member of the avengers, now he doesnt even have that.
 
His insecurity could well stem from his being around these guys as a normal bod scientist, then suddenly being thrust into the big game after his Pym particle discovery. They are already established, powerful, and in some cases legendary. He has just been thrown in there with nothing by his present actions to speak for him.
 
just seems wrong, wasp suggested the name avengers, and pym suggested they form a team. but atleast we are getting the avengers cartoon with the original members. i have to say the art style is not my favorite, but beggers can't be choosers
 
Last edited:
I've never seen Stark in the same category as Pym and Richards because to me he's more of a builder and a businessman. It's just a rocket suit, after all.

That said, it's interesting to define what every Marvel egg heads are all about. Maybe Pym could be the "perfector". Like use what others have done and make something even better. Like use the dimensional capabilities found in space travels from the FF and the mutagenic aspect of gamma radiation that were able to make Banner change size with a new source of energy and come up with his size changing formula. Use Stark's super advanced abilities in computer engenering "his Jarvis, his armor, etc..) to create artificial intelligence aka Ultron and later on maybe Vision(?).

:whatever:

You should read more Iron Man.
 
Wasn't Pym funded by Jan's dad or something like that? I seem to recall that's how they met. I could be wrong though. In the Avengers, I'd prefer Giantman. To have Antman and Wasp on the same team seems redundant, powerwise.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,306
Messages
22,082,786
Members
45,883
Latest member
Gbiopobing
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"