The Original Bamfer
Big, Bald and Beautiful
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2003
- Messages
- 42,637
- Reaction score
- 508
- Points
- 73
5.5/10. Full review later.
To me, if they were intending to do smaller scale film (seems they started out that way with a lower *cut* budget than the previous few), they should have pushed it rated R....left out the alien bits and made Chastain and her goons regular mutants in a secret society/Illuminati thing....leave it earthbound (no alien subplot) but with bigger action or power displays. I think it would have gotten bigger returns and better reception.But who's to say it "should" feel upscale? It's an adaptation, and interpretation of a comic book. The scale is what it is.
That claustrophobic feeling could very well be the actual intent of the filmmakers. It can act as a metaphor for how Jean feels inside of her own mind and body. Being constrained and restricted could be a theme worked into the subtext. It's a style and an atmosphere. Just sayin... you have to look at each film for what it is and who made it.![]()
I don't mean Disney's movie. I mean movie in disney stye.
Deadpool is very disney-ish. the greater violence it's not the point.
So Wonder Woman is a perfect disney style movie.
Logan was not submit as superhero movie (and it has the same score of Homecoming, that said much more)
I don't wanna make any war.
I like disney style.
but even if i like sushi, if they close all other type restaurant, i will think it is a problem.
I enjoyed this. Could have been 10-15 minutes longer to help expand upon some character developments. Magneto feels as superfluous here as Wolverine’s cameo in Apocalypse. It’s not a terrible thing, just a note.
Cool power displays & visuals here. Sure Storm isn’t the main player, but she has her moments. Same with Nightcrawler. A longer runtime would have really helped these two, as well as Beast and Cyclops.
Not my favorite of the new films, but not the worst X-Men movie.
A lot of non-American reviewers like the ones from the UK and France also negatively reviewed the film.It's a good movie. I don't understand the USA critics.
My first time posting in here. But I really liked the movie. RT critics definitely got this wrong and seemed to have an agenda. Sophie did a great job as Jean
I always facepalm whenever someone throws these delusional accusations that critics are biased against a franchise they’ve given mostly positive reviews to.My first time posting in here. But I really liked the movie. RT critics definitely got this wrong and seemed to have an agenda. Sophie did a great job as Jean

Neither Wonder Woman nor Deadpool are "Disney-style" movies.
WW is pure WB style - very Hollywood, very classic movie-making. Deadpool is so far removed from what Disney does.
I cannot think of a single film made by Disney which is close to either in terms of tone, production values, story or talent...
I posted in the main thread. 6.5/10 for me.
Visuals, sound were really top notch. Sophie was just amazing. You can tell she tried.
"Disney-style" = fun and colorful = immature and kiddy
I always facepalm when people say that simply because, had things been different and the film earned a 90% plus on Rotten Tomatoes, then they would be saying "Look at that RT SCORE! It's AWESOME!!"I always facepalm whenever someone throws these delusional accusations that critics are biased against a franchise they’ve given mostly positive reviews to.
And no the critics weren’t really ‘wrong’ nor were they really ‘right’. They were only honest with their feelings of the movie. Least you forget movies are subjective.
Dark Phoenix (2019) Review
The Avengers were not the only team coming to the end of an era this year. Overshadowed by the MCU’s end of the Infinity Saga and forgotten amidst a crowded summer as a whole is the final film in the pantheon of Fox’s X-Men universe that was established in 2001 with Bryan Singer’s X-Men and helped usher in the era of the comic book superhero film as a major force in Hollywood. With Disney’s purchase of 20th Century Fox, the end of this 19 year old franchise was clear. Getting to the big screen has been a bit of a journey for this latest entry, however. The film was due to come out last November but was delayed on 2 occasions before settling on its current release date, largely due to a hefty amount of reshoots that took place. Heavy delays and several months of reshoots are rarely a positive sign for a movie. Buzz for Dark Phoenix has been toxic basically since inception, and it’s current Rotten Tomatoes score rivals bottom of the barrell films such as Blade: Trinity or Green Lantern. So that begs the question: is the movie as bad as advertised?
Much of the hatred for this has been directed towards Simon Kinberg. Between his used car salesman use of buzzwords and his attachment to other much maligned films as the most recent Fantastic Four and his various X-Men film credits as writer, here we see Simon step into the director’s chair for the first time. For his directorial debut, Simon opted to use the Dark Phoenix story for the franchise’s second time. Kinberg was also a writer on the previous attempt at this story in X-Men: The Last Stand. His efforts here are a mixed bag. The movie itself looks competently shot and the special effects are mostly good. The film itself looks professional. But there are serious pacing issues with this film. Every scene feels like they end abruptly so that we can move on to the next scene. Very few scenes are allowed to linger and build properly, which hurts character development. Would it have hurt to add like 5 minutes to the movie so we could breathe a little?
Kinberg has been talking up a storm about wanting to do right by this story, but this film I don’t feel was ever in a position to succeed and was flawed from conception. X-Men: Apocalypse made a monumental mistake in choosing to neglect the development of Cyclops, Jean, etc. X-Men: Days of Future Past felt like a movie that should have been the end of the core First Class team’s story with them as the primary focus, and X-Men: Apocalypse should have passed the torch to the new core team. But by not properly developing them in that movie, it did Dark Phoenix a great disservice. The story is well liked because of its moral complexity in part, but what really makes it a classic is the loyalty that we had to those characters in the story by the time we got to the Dark Phoenix story. Even X-Men: The Last Stand had 2 prior films to build off of when bringing that story to life, but here we see an underdeveloped Jean Grey that we don’t ultimately care about being overtaken by the entity, hurting her underdeveloped friends, etc. In essence, you cannot do this type of story without proper development. It won’t land with audiences the way you want them to. This feels like something that could have worked in the sequel to this movie, not this movie. Yeah, pacing issues and such don’t do you any favors when you’re trying to craft the story also, but even if the script were amazing, I feel the audience still would not have cared to the extent they were hoping for.
Acting here is hit and miss. Much has also been made about Jennifer Lawrence and her very public desire to be done with this franchise. Here’s what I know about Lawrence based on her performance in this movie: she showed up to set, said the lines she was legally obligated to say, and got a paycheck. She gives her lines absolutely no weight to them whatsoever and it is almost comical at times. The worst example being when she is trying to reach Jean and talk her down. That scene is hilarious to watch because of how unconvincing she is. But I do feel a genuine amount of care amongst the cast in the movie, overall. James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender are much better in this movie than their previous efforts. Magneto may even be MVP of the movie, which is a fine turn around given how much I hated his arc and the obvious lack of ideas with him in X-Men: Apocalypse. Tye Sheridan actually plays Cyclops like a person for the first time maybe in this whole series. Nicholas Hoult does a fine job, as well. Sophie Turner is good in this movie, but strangely for a movie called Dark Phoenix, I felt she disappeared into the background of the plot way too much. The rest of the main X-Men in the movie are background fodder, though. They don’t get much to do. That brings me to Jessica Chastain’s character. If there is on fatally underbaked element of the plot, it is the alien threat. They’re basically not in the movie. They show up a few times sporadically, but outside of being the fight at the end, they do nothing. Chastain’s character woefully suffers due to this. It’s not really her fault. She is doing everything she is told to do fine, but this entire plot line needed taken back to formula. It just doesn’t work.
While the film is ultimately a disappointing end to what was once a proud franchise, I don’t feel like it as bad as true abominations of superhero cinema. This is not a great movie by any means. There is plenty of things wrong with it. But it is not all bad. There are some well done action sequences, the special effects are largely very good outside of a few bits clearly from reshoots they didn’t get time to finish, and there some interesting ideas in the story at times. The film is probably closer in quality to the likes of X-Men: Apocalypse than it is X-Men Origins: Wolverine. It’s not so bad it’s good and it’s not so bad it’s unwatchable. It just sort of exists. Perhaps this series should have ended with Logan, outside of the Deadpool films of course, but let us not forget everything this franchise did for making the superhero film respectable. That doesn’t improve the quality of this film by any means, but with the franchise coming to an end I do want to offer the Fox X-Men films a genuine thank you for what they did. It’s not always been perfect, there have been ups and downs, but I will continue to enjoy the genuine gems of the series. While probably forgetting about this one, of course.
Overall Rating - 2 out of 5