Actually, I'm afraid if you believe that this game is going to be worth a damn or that the people of IGN are so ignorant that they couldn't possibly score a game correctly then you, my friend, are the idiot.
I'm disappointed to see the negative reception. I was hoping this would be my new Bond game.
Everything or Nothing was a decent diversion from that, but they really ought to be looking at games like Deus Ex or Mass Effect. Basically, they need to make Alpha Protocol except, you know, good.
It wouldn't be the first time I've encountered plain ignorance from IGN.
I'm well aware that there are many negative reviews for this game, some positive.
But IGN have given this game 4.5. They gave Silent Hill Downpour a 4.5 as well. That was ridiculous. Some idiot reviewer who was pissed that Downpour wasn't like SH2, and gave it that low score, based PURELY out of ignorance.
I don't trust in their reviews for that alone. Hacks.
I agree. Blood Stone wasn't great overall, but there were some good idea. I think with more use of gadgets, some true stealth and just more fluidity overall with character movement and control, and it could've been a great game.Every game should be like Everything or Nothing and Blood Stone since they're the best
That's my issue. I'm not a huge FPS fan, although I have been surprised by how much I enjoyed certain games like Borderlands. But seeing a Bond game that is a FPS immediately turns me off.I have not played EON but I own Blood Stone and it is a FUN game, never was a HUGE fan of FPS games even tho I own resistance 1 and 2, and Black Ops for PS3 and Quantum of Solace for 360.
Blood Stone felt like a lazy version of EoN. It almost looked rush like a movie tie-in, except it wasn't a tie-in. I think that's part of what made EoN so great, in that it wasn't based on a Bond film, but it looked like one.EoN is a lot like Blood Stone but a whole lot better.
After reading the review for Silent Hill Downpour, I can see that Silent Hill 2 is mentioned exactly one time. I believe the ignorance is on your part, friendo.
Still didn't deserve a 4.5
Don't know where, how, or why he came up with that, because it was unwarranted.

.
That's what we call a personal opinion. Which also explains why the reviewer gave the game a 4.5. Common sense man, common sense.![]()
That's what we call a personal opinion. Which also explains why the reviewer gave the game a 4.5. Common sense man, common sense.![]()