11 year old boy stripped and attacked by 3 girls

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh I know....I just said I wish. I could imagine the terror. Some chicks are scary...:hehe:
 
Double standards are justified.

I agree with Catman.


Placing charges here is a bit silly.
 
Man of Tomorrow, Mr. Wooden Alligator and Catman are all just huge fetishist of clothed female nude male scenarios and can't understand why any man or boy wouldn't be turned on by being humiliated by a group of cute girls.

They've got something twisted in their brains, are deluded and clueless or are just loser trolls making light of a disgusting situation.
 
Man of Tomorrow, Mr. Wooden Alligator and Catman are all just huge fetishist of clothed female nude male scenarios and can't understand why any man or boy wouldn't be turned on by being humiliated by a group of cute girls.

They've got something twisted in their brains, are deluded and clueless or are just loser trolls making light of a disgusting situation.

You are beating this to death. The kid was embarrassed, YES! He wasn't raped by knife point pointed at his throat or penetrated with a d*ck or broomstick. I think there is a big difference between that than getting humiliated by some dumb girls going to far with a prank.
 
Last edited:
You are beating this to death. The kid was embarrassed, YES! He wasn't raped by knife point pointed at his throat or penetrated with a d*ck or broomstick. I think there is a big difference between that and getting humiliated by some dumb girls going to far with a prank.
You would be reacting differently if 3 14 year old boys pinned down an 11 year old girl and stripped her naked. The shame and humiliation for males who suffer sexual abuse is just as bad as that of females, because the experience is emasculating. Not having control over your own body while someone else violates it is a humiliating and degrading experience whether you are a man or a woman, and it should not be tolerated, nor should double-standards be tolerated.
 
That embarrassment can lead to a murdering-suicide lunatic or a person who scared of girls,etc. Stuff like this isn't mess around with. Also if this happen to a girl you'd probably want the guys to be hanged.
 
That poor kid. Most of us don't want to be seen naked much less be seen naked by millions online. I'm sure he wants this to all go away, I wouldn't doubt that's one of the reason they don't want to press charges. The kid doesn't want to have to relive this nightmare any longer than he has to.
 
I think the reason they aren't being charged the same way 3 boys would be, boils down to perceived motivation. 3 boys doing this to a girl would be seen as sexually motivated and not as just trying to humiliate someone. Girls work differently. I doubt they even thought they were doing anything sexual because humiliation was probably their primary goal.

It also has to do with biology, as well. It is far harder for a female to forcibly have sex with an unwilling male, than it is the other way around. Facts of our biology, and hence, the double standard.
 
I doubt he'll grow up as some kind of crazed rapist or whatever, but he'll definitely be pissed at all women for a while. That **** could really warp his view of females.
 
Seems I'm a bit late to the party. I see Catman has officially earned himself the title of "SHH's resident sexual deviant"... :o
 
I think the reason they aren't being charged the same way 3 boys would be, boils down to perceived motivation. 3 boys doing this to a girl would be seen as sexually motivated and not as just trying to humiliate someone. Girls work differently. I doubt they even thought they were doing anything sexual because humiliation was probably their primary goal.

It also has to do with biology, as well. It is far harder for a female to forcibly have sex with an unwilling male, than it is the other way around. Facts of our biology, and hence, the double standard.

Far harder? I don't know if it would be harder. Wouldn't it be easier? All a female has to do is make the male aroused and then ride him until he has an orgasm. In the reverse situation, the female will probably not be aroused at all, but the male's biology is such that he probably would get aroused. Then he would likely feel extreme shame if he did orgasm because there would be the underlying feeling that maybe he partly enjoyed it or at least derived some satisfaction even if he were completely terrorised, because he wouldn't be able to control his bodily function. Of course, this sounds like a rather hypothetical situation anyway as it's hard to imagine any female overpowering and raping a male in this way.
 
You are beating this to death. The kid was embarrassed, YES! He wasn't raped by knife point pointed at his throat or penetrated with a d*ck or broomstick. I think there is a big difference between that than getting humiliated by some dumb girls going to far with a prank.

Bingo.


People are way too oversensitive nowadays.
 
Or maybe you're just too insensitive nowadays...
 
I can't believe there are actually people trying to defend these three little harpies. :barf:

No wonder bullying is such a problem in schools these days. People are perfectly content to just sit back and try to justify it instead of punishing the guilty.
 
You would be reacting differently if 3 14 year old boys pinned down an 11 year old girl and stripped her naked. The shame and humiliation for males who suffer sexual abuse is just as bad as that of females, because the experience is emasculating. Not having control over your own body while someone else violates it is a humiliating and degrading experience whether you are a man or a woman, and it should not be tolerated, nor should double-standards be tolerated.

Yes I would react differently, Boys have different intentions when it comes to a situation like this BUT this video isn't about that..
 
I think the reason they aren't being charged the same way 3 boys would be, boils down to perceived motivation. 3 boys doing this to a girl would be seen as sexually motivated and not as just trying to humiliate someone. Girls work differently. I doubt they even thought they were doing anything sexual because humiliation was probably their primary goal.

It also has to do with biology, as well. It is far harder for a female to forcibly have sex with an unwilling male, than it is the other way around. Facts of our biology, and hence, the double standard.

Men who rape women do not do it because it's the only way they are going to get any action. Rapists rape women because they love the sense of empowerment, and because they enjoy the thrill of violating another human being's autonomy. Likewise, these girls were tormenting and violating this boy because they enjoyed the sense of power that it gave them. Whether or not they got sexual gratification out of it is beyond the point, because the damage they did to this boy would have been the same either way.
 
Whether the incident was intended to be sexual or not, is it not still a physical assault?
 
Far harder? I don't know if it would be harder. Wouldn't it be easier? All a female has to do is make the male aroused and then ride him until he has an orgasm. In the reverse situation, the female will probably not be aroused at all, but the male's biology is such that he probably would get aroused. Then he would likely feel extreme shame if he did orgasm because there would be the underlying feeling that maybe he partly enjoyed it or at least derived some satisfaction even if he were completely terrorised, because he wouldn't be able to control his bodily function. Of course, this sounds like a rather hypothetical situation anyway as it's hard to imagine any female overpowering and raping a male in this way.

An erection can be forced. I'm not going to go into details, but simply put if someone "prods" a man in a certain spot, he'll get an erection whether he wants one or not. It's not even sexual arousal, but rather a defensive reaction from the nervous system. Men DO get raped by women, but it is rarely ever reported because the the men do not want to go through the humiliation of going to court, especially since there is an almost insurmountable level of bias against male rape victims both in court and the eyes of the public. They know that people will react with "so you got free sex, stop whining about it!" and that it's difficult to convince the courts that a woman overpowered them, so it typically goes unreported.
 
Intent doesn't ****ing matter.The Boy was screaming on the ground crying for his mom. The girls were bullying him. The girls were undressing him without his consent. This is a crime. What don't you idiots understand. It doesn't matter their ****ing intentions, this is still a ****ing crime. If I shoot someone and I didn't mean it, well thats called manslaughter and im still going to jail. Also think about how this boy felt. Not only was he embarrassed, this is on the internet now and now people at school might bully him more for getting picked on by girls. Also think about the mental aspects of this. You people know bullies sometimes do **** up things right? I hope you don't forget this if somebody comes shoot up a mall your in you morons. Who knows what this boy might do to women or his feelings toward women. These girls deserve punishment. This is not a joking matter. Think about it about it for a second would you. It was a 11 year boy. Some boys at that age aren't thinking about girls. Think about it if you were in in his shoes and not a porn watching virgin who thinks this could be a man's fantasy. But whatever, the people who think this is a joke don't care so this rant is pointless but I had to get this **** off my chest.
:dry:
 
These girls should be punished the same as if the genders were reversed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,079,673
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"