• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

2010 NFL Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
they are staying in St. Louis....football belongs in the south....NFL games in LA would just have the crowd showing up an hour late and then on their phones the whole game

kind of like Dodger games

How painfully accurate.
 
they are staying in St. Louis....football belongs in the south....NFL games in LA would just have the crowd showing up an hour late and then on their phones the whole game

kind of like Dodger games

LA has had Rams for well over half a century and the franchise did well over here, so I don't understand why all the hatred toward LA getting another NFL team. We still have a huge NFL fanbase here, and (according to Cowherd of ESPN radio), NFL has the second best tracking here behind Lakers throughout the year. As for fans showing up late and on the cell the whole game, I think you just described Miami Heat's fans.
 
and LA....its a fickle city and if the team doesn't win, attendance will totally nosedive and its the Raiders situation all over again
 
LA does not deserve a football team...They had their chances. It is time to find another city that will gladly take a football team.

How about Oklahoma City
 
and LA....its a fickle city and if the team doesn't win, attendance will totally nosedive and its the Raiders situation all over again

There are other cities that have fickled fans, but you made it seems like LA is the only city that does it. And LA does have great fans, otherwise we won't have 2 NBA teams, 1 MLB team (or two if you count 'LA Angels'), 1 NHL team, and 1 MLS team. And like I said before, NFL is in it to make money, and if LA can make money for them, then they will give LA a NFL team.
 
The Clippers don't count.....everyone knows this

They may not be relevant, but at least they make enough money to stay in NBA and sign talents like Griffin. And they aren't the Supersonics, who relocated to OKC and became the Thunder, either.
 
If you're a Redskins fan you cannot be mad at Donovan McNabb last night. If anything he proved to be the only solid player on their roster against the Eagles. The Eagles were shutting them out spectacularly and McNabb still mustered a decent number of points on the board. It was the defense that failed them. They just aren't that good a team.
 
Wow, what an entertaining MNF game, unless you are a 'Skins fan. :oldrazz: Looks like Eagles will have to give Vick an extension contract, although I'm not sure how they can keep two high-salary QB on their payroll, so I think they will have to trade Kolb even though with Vick's playmaking tendencies, he is bound to get seriously hurt one of those days.
If Vick stays healthy, they'll make a go at the superbowl for sure this year I think. Although I do feel Vicks injury status is always on the line. There are a lot of defensive players who would've given him a lot more trouble than the Deadskins did last night.
 
I say call them the LA Bandwagoners
 
I live in Saint Louis and I want my Rams to stay. My only problem with them is that they are gonna try and make the city try and build them a new stadium and that doesnt float to well with me when we could just take the dome off the current one.
 
they are staying in St. Louis....football belongs in the south....NFL games in LA would just have the crowd showing up an hour late and then on their phones the whole game

kind of like Dodger games

The Midwest called, and would like to know when exactly you relocated the state of Missouri? :confused:

LA has had Rams for well over half a century and the franchise did well over here, so I don't understand why all the hatred toward LA getting another NFL team. We still have a huge NFL fanbase here, and (according to Cowherd of ESPN radio), NFL has the second best tracking here behind Lakers throughout the year. As for fans showing up late and on the cell the whole game, I think you just described Miami Heat's fans.

Or basically 75% of the people who can now afford to attend a game at Yankee Stadium

I'm calling it now

Raiders/Eagles Superbowl :o

You'd be correct too...if this was 1980 :o

I say call them the LA Bandwagoners

Actually I think the team most likely to move to LA at this point is the Vikings. Clueless and impatient ownership, a city that wont ever build them a new stadium, and other factors could lead them to being first on the move. Plus, it's not like L.A. hasnt stolen a purple and gold clad franchise from Minneapolis before. And L.A. Vikings would make just about as much sense as L.A. Lakers does.
 
I wish I had a map to better illustrate my point.....Missouri is the South, screw facts thats just how I see it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"