What's happening with the boards?
It's been taking ages to load for me.
What's happening with the boards?
It's been taking ages to load for me.

バット人;22114571 said:Man, I somehow lost my downloads of the better quality prologue and trailer. The trailer I don't really care about because it'll be up in HQ in a few days, but the prologue? Gah. I had both of them saved on my itunes account today, go back to play them again and get that stupid"cannot locate file" message. Tried searching for the best prologue bootleg just now, nada. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
Damn, Warners is serious about keepin this movie under wrapsバット人;22114571 said:Man, I somehow lost my downloads of the better quality prologue and trailer. The trailer I don't really care about because it'll be up in HQ in a few days, but the prologue? Gah. I had both of them saved on my itunes account today, go back to play them again and get that stupid"cannot locate file" message. Tried searching for the best prologue bootleg just now, nada. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

After watching it a couple more times, it's pretty obvious this can't be the final version of the scene. At least I hope it isn't. There are some really wonky edits, like the explosion that takes off the planes tail. They repeat the explosion twice which is a big editing no-no. There are also some really odd jumps during the CIA agent's whole spiel about throwing people out of the plane.
Why did they take blood from Dr. Pavel?
They repeat the explosion twice which is a big editing no-no.
It showcases that people are curious about Bane and his myth. His reputation is growing. And it also showcases that Bane is intelligent (swapping contexts to apply to the CIA agent instead of him) and badass (telling the CIA guy he's about to get owned).There was some dialogue that seemed a bit off to me. Two exchanges in particular:
1. CIA Agent: If I pull that off, will you die?
Bane: It would be extremely painful
CIA Agent: You're a big guy.
Bane: For you.
I don't really understand the need for that bit to be included. What's the point?
They transfused his blood to one of the guys who would die in the crash, so the CIA would think Pavel died in the crash.
They transfused his blood to one of the guys who would die in the crash, so the CIA would think Pavel died in the crash.
They transfused his blood to one of the guys who would die in the crash, so the CIA would think Pavel died in the crash.
No. It's horrible editing. No getting around that fact.I thought that was fine, it's good to see it from two very different angles.
Can anyone tell me who is falling down in the street brawl scene, during the ending montage? I only saw a mediocre copy.
No. It's horrible editing. No getting around that fact.
It's not horrible editing. It was effective in the medium it was used.
I didn't see one person not ONE person leave the theater scratching their heads as to why the explosion happened twice.
Perhaps its not your preference but that is not the ultimate standard of editing for the rest of the world.
I'm a pretty big Nolan fan, but his movies have some really bad editing sometimes, particularly the action scenes. Lee Smith edited X-Men First Class, which has very well edited action scenes. I don't get why his work on Nolan's films is subpar. Maybe he's doing the best he can do with what Nolan provides him. I dunno.