A theory about an alternate TDKR with the Joker

Discussion in 'The Dark Knight Rises' started by The Eradicator, Nov 30, 2012.

  1. Ryan

    Ryan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,315
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm confused. How do we know that Crane was in Arkham? I understand he was put there in Begins but how do we know after he was caught in TDK that he was put back there? Of course, we can speculate, but I like proof instead :)
    Wouldn't matter either way as Bane could bust out anyone he wanted by that point in TDKR, no explanation needed. Plus I really don't read too much into the cameo's of the Scarecrow in TDK or in TDKR as part of some great Shakepearan act by Nolan. He had him in there for pure fun and fan service. Both movies would have been just as fine without him.
     
    #51
  2. The Joker

    The Joker The Clown Prince of Crime

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2003
    Messages:
    49,571
    Likes Received:
    111
    "I actually didn't like Crane showing up in TDKR as well because he would have been in Arkham Asylum and since there was nothing mentioned about TDKR, Crane's appearances just seemed off."

    The lack of a mention of Arkham and him being there seemed off implies bad writing.

    Why? Who's easier to control? A legion of insane criminals or sane ones?

    Yes. But he was unaware of that.

    I never said they should and I would never want them to either. Then where would I be without having pages and pages of these fun multi quotes posts?

    Ok two things;

    1. You can have all the theories you like. You just don't have anything from the movie that supports it regarding Batman and the 8 year gap. But you can believe what ever you want. My point is you are perfectly happy to apply a logic like that to one thing, but cannot imagine something so absurdly simple as breaking out one inmate from Arkham. You actually wanted to be spoon fed such a thing in the movie.

    2. Crane serving as the Judge for residents of Gotham instead of just "anyone" or another LOS member makes more sense because Crane is a resident of Gotham and therefore is in a better position to pass sentence on other Gotham citizens. Second he is a cut above your average LOS member when it comes to intelligence. He's a doctor. He's a far smarter choice.

    Why is that? Dent is mentioning that the Falcone empire lost it's leader when Falcone was put in Arkham. So that means someone had to step in and run everything.

    That doesn't mean Falcone is still languishing in Arkham months later.

    Yes it would, because it was Falcone's transfer to Arkham that made his position up for grabs. And most likely when Maroni stepped in to run things.

    Remember this all happened in Begins in the space of a couple of days.

    How were they pivotal to helping the League when Bane's plan was never ever reliant on them to begin with? They were helping the League because Bane set them free and armed them with guns.

    It's simply a case of the more the merrier. Not a case of we need the numbers to run the city.

    But Anno, that is the same for all movies. Within days of TDK's release Ra's was compared to Joker. Sandman and Venom were compared to Doc Ock after Spider-Man 3's release etc.

    It also happens with the movies right after release. Comparing which movie is better. It's the nature of the beast with superhero fans. They always compare.

    Comparisons to the Joker were inevitable.

    It's sillier to say it would happen based on no proof at all, or even past examples of where a villain cameo did that.

    No, I'm not. I concede there would have been some buzz for Joker appearing in the movie again in any capacity. But to say a cameo would have dwarfed everyone else in the movie is the height of insanity.

    I am. That's why I'm confident in saying this. Unless you can give me some examples of your alleged scenario that would happen, because I've given you some examples of mine.

    You mean Spider-Man 3? Wouldn't the fact that there is so little praise for the villains in it mean that even more praise would be given to Norman?

    Well thanks for telling me what you think I would have kept doing. But I think I know myself better than you.

    Norman in the Spider-Man sequels, Wolverine in First Class, Xavier in Wolverine etc.

    All mega popular characters, but did you see everyone talking so much about them more than the majority of the main characters in the movies?
     
    #52
  3. Anno_Domini

    Anno_Domini Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    17,997
    Likes Received:
    0
    Imo, Crane would have been in Arkham Asylum because he was a crazed man who created a gas that would bring out someone's greatest fears, as well as it's up in the air that he's even cured after being gassed himself in Batman Begins.

    Also, while both of his cameos in TDK and TDKR could be viewed as just fun fan service, his cameo in TDK is also for continuity's sake since he went MIA after the events in BB and it was shown that Batman was still trying to clean up those events by bringing in any escapees from Arkham, which included Scarecrow.

    It would have helped in the reasoning of why Crane showed up, but it's not necessarily bad writing.

    You're asking this question even when I asked why Crane is even there to begin with, who's mostly likely insane?

    And he's unaware of Bane wanting to destroy Gotham City which includes Crane himself. Just using Crane the same exact way, so how is it any better?

    Probably being at a much peaceful place in these forums where you don't have to reply to multi-quote posts day after day, I know I would, but I try to keep up until I'm just too dead tired to reply.

    No support? Certain pieces of dialogue does support my theory, wild or not.

    Passing what sentence though? Just tossing out the cops and mostly the rich citizens out unto the ice river. You have to be a Gothamite to pass such a predictable sentencing?

    So you're saying he's only mentioning the few days Falcone was put away in Arkham, someone needed to get a hold of power quickly in a matter of days?

    Exactly; a couple of days. I don't buy Maroni having to step up that quickly.

    I say they were pivotal because once they became part of Bane's plan after finding out about the truth about Dent, these criminals were handed guns and went along with the LoS in patrolling/policing the city, escorting people unto the ice river, hunting down cops, etc. That to me, shows them that they were pivotal to a point that they became allies to the League in that regard even if not knowing about the League's true intentions.

    And making comparisons isn't even my point. I'm saying Joker would be compared EVEN more if he had some important plot with Batman, even with a cameo that'll tally up in his favor with still saying who is the better villain, even in the trilogy as a whole.

    It's silly to say Joker would be the talk of TDKR even as a cameo because of simply it being Joker?

    You say some buzz, I say major buzz. I think it would indeed dwarf the amount of attention Bane would receive.

    I can't give any examples as we've never had seen one of the greatest villains in a CBM show up in a cameo, which yes, would've create massive hype.

    Would that much even be given to Norman who wasn't that great of a villain to begin with(imo)?

    So you wouldn't have contributed to this then?

    Popular comic book characters yes, but did any of them make as much buzz as Joker has in any CBM?
     
    #53
  4. The Joker

    The Joker The Clown Prince of Crime

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2003
    Messages:
    49,571
    Likes Received:
    111
    I agree.

    Crane is there because he's one man who worked loyally for the LOS in Gotham before. He's not an uncontrollable psychopath. He's a cool, calculating psycho who knows how to follow orders as was shown in Begins.

    Any better than what? You asked why Crane would be here again, I gave you an answer. He worked for the LOS before, the LOS was under new management, with a whole new scheme, and in control of Gotham.

    What other reasons did you want to hear?

    Nobody is forcing you to reply. If you feel this is disrupting the harmony in any way then the logical thing to do would be not to respond and keep it going.

    No dialogue supports it. But there's multiple quotes that say Batman's been gone for 8 years. Nolan himself said the 8 year gap is the retirement period for Batman.

    It's so straight forward.

    Yes, these were the courts for the guilty and the corrupt of Gotham. They were not going to let any Joe blow have this task.

    Yes, that's what I'm saying. When Falcone was put into Arkham after going "crazy", the Falcone empire was left without a leader. Hence why Dent said with Falcone in Arkham someone had to step up to run the crime family.

    You can buy what you like. Gordon said the Narrows was lost at the end of Begins. That's where Arkham was. So what makes you think Falcone was even still in there anyway when the whole Narrows island was done for.

    I don't know how many times a fact so simple as Bane's plan never ever relying on man power from Blackgate to take over and run Gotham. If it did, I'd be agreeing with you. But the Dent lie was just an accidental bonus and just added more troops to Bane's already healthy ranks.

    Pivotal doesn't come into it when it comes to the Blackgate inmates. They were an accidental unexpected bonus.

    Then your point is moot, because whether he was in it or not, he still would have been compared to Bane. If the villain was Mr. Freeze in TDK, it would have been him getting compared to Bane.

    The outcome would have been the same in regards to comparisons. The Joker just happens to be a better and more popular villain for the majority.

    Yes exactly. You are basically saying a came from him would eclipse all the new characters just because it's the Joker.

    It sounds ridiculous.

    Fine. I don't understand your logic for that though.

    Who do you consider greatest villains in a CBM?

    Go to the Spidey forums and ask do they think Dafoe was a great villain. Then you'll see.

    Of course I would. But to say this buzz would have been the predominant buzz over the whole movie and all the new characters is a falsity.

    That's not the point. Those characters are big popular fishes in their fan base pond. They didn't steal the limelight from everyone in the movies they had a cameo in.
     
    #54
  5. jmc

    jmc away for a while

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    32,314
    Likes Received:
    60
    In terms of Bruce sharing a cell with The Joker, to me anyway the vibe I've gotten from TDK was that The Joker didn't really want to know who Batman was and wouldn't want to know who Batman is, he's the Joker's inspiration, as he says 'You complete me'.
     
    #55
  6. Marvolo

    Marvolo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    37,637
    Likes Received:
    103
    This video makes me smile...and then it makes me really sad thinking that we lost a wonderful person, actor, and Joker all too soon.:(

    Joker would def do something like this. Nobody kills Batman but him. Just think of some of the moments we could have gotten sticking Ledger's Joker in a scene with Bane.
     
    #56
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2012
  7. BH/HHH

    BH/HHH You Are My World

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    21
    I always think they should have shown Batman bringing in Victor Zsaz
     
    #57
  8. not_a_victim

    not_a_victim Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,059
    Likes Received:
    0

    As much as would have liked to have seen Ledger reprise his role for TDKR, this is a hack idea. I don't think Nolan et al would in any way allow this sort of Deus ex machina in the form of the Joker to prevent his death.

    Now maybe, if Joker had been in the movie all along, and turned against Bane to do this, then maybe, but certainly not as his first appearance all the way in the third act.
     
    #58
  9. CrypticOne

    CrypticOne Poetic Violence

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    10,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    Has Nolan or someone that knows the story come forward and explained what Ledger's role would have been in TDKR? If not, I hope sometime in the future they shed some light on it. Would be a cool thing to know.
     
    #59
  10. not_a_victim

    not_a_victim Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,059
    Likes Received:
    0
    If the Joker's speech to Batman at the end of the movie is any indication...
    1. Joker would have been in the third movie.
    -"you and i are destined to do this forever"
    2. Joker was going to break the news to Gotham that Dent was a murderer.
    - TDKR could have been Batman's fight to keep Dent's clean image alive
    Which is basically the plot of TDKR, substituting Bane for Joker.
     
    #60
  11. uniqueweasel

    uniqueweasel Don't Drink and Bake

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,168
    Likes Received:
    0
    I also think that
     
    #61
  12. Anno_Domini

    Anno_Domini Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    17,997
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sure he knows how to follow orders when he doesn't know the true intentions of the LoS. But once again, being a pawn once more isn't something they should've done again. You bring up the fact once that you didn't like the LoS being used again, so how do you feel about Crane essentially being a pawn once again such as his role in BB?

    But you also asked if this was any better than in BB, but don't you think it's not any better since he's still a pawn without knowing the true intentions, even with "new management"?

    Unless I become too tired, I feel it's best for my opinions to still be heard and you feel the same I presume.

    Alfred telling Bruce he hasn't been in the Batcave in a while, Batman telling Gordon he wasn't needed because they won. That supports my theory. And we've been through this already, so no need to get into this specific topic again, but if you think Maroni took control when Falcone was gone in Arkham for what you believe to only be a few days, then why couldn't someone have taken control over the mob after Maroni's exit which would keep Batman around until the Dent Act was created?

    Why not? A simple sentencing of 'Exile or Death'. Someone with importance had to have that role of a predictable sentencing?

    So could it have been possible the same could have happened after Maroni died which would call for Batman to stick around until the Dent Act was created as I mentioned above?

    Where else would Falcone be? He was too messed in the head to have even tried to run off like the other Arkham inmates.

    Pivotal only being that they were helping the LoS once they escaped. That's what I meant by using the word as pivotal as they build up the numbers for Bane's army, that's all. Plus I'm not even saying they aren't viewed as some bonus for Bane.

    Also saying the comparisons would've been added more to Joker even in his cameo as well as I'm sure Joker would have had another mental game of chase with Batman even in a cameo as I'm sure his cameo would have had something to do with Batman.

    Joker's already being over any other villains in this trilogy, so why wouldn't his cameo be more talked about than even the main villain?

    It's fine if you don't. I'm not telling you to get my logic.

    Joker, Doc Ock, Fassbender's Magneto, General Zod, Loki, Bane after seeing TDKR. Maybe even Top Dollar from The Crow.

    So look at biased views from people who go to the Spidey forums?

    Once again, let's just say we are in disagreement over this. I do feel that Joker would carry most of the buzz off of TDKR.

    Spider-Man 2 - Doc Ock was the best villain of Raimi's entire trilogy, and while seeing Norman Osborn appearing was very awesome indeed, it didn't overshadow the best villain of the trilogy.

    Spider-Man 3 - I honestly don't think anyone can find anything praise worthy for the third film, but people have acknowledged Dafoe's cameo as being a highlight.

    First Class - Were people really excited to see Wolverine once more especially after X-Men Origins: Wolverine?

    Wolverine - It was nice in seeing Xavier, but the idea that it contradicts continuity would take away said excitement. I know it did with me.
     
    #62
  13. BlueLightning

    BlueLightning Caballero de la Luz

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,483
    Likes Received:
    0
    I read some of the comments, and I just wanted to add a little something about this. Bane was an intelligent man, I don't think he would release an unpredictable dangerous maniac like the Joker. He is a wild card, if anything he would have kept him from interfering.

    Also about Crane, I thought he went insane. Lucius did make a cure, but nor Crane or Falcone were treated with readiness, and they were exposed to a concentrated dose, unlike the diluted toxin in the water supply. I thought that was the reason Crane kept using his Scarecrow mask on TDK, and lacing the drugs with his fear toxin with no reason whatsoever.
     
    #63
  14. The Joker

    The Joker The Clown Prince of Crime

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2003
    Messages:
    49,571
    Likes Received:
    111
    Which he doesn't here either. So what's your problem?

    But another destroy the city with a deadly device plot should be done again. Another Al Ghul pretending to be someone they're not should be done again. Another Cop chase of Batman again etc.

    Please.

    Crane's role was tiny, but those repetitive plots were major. If Crane's little cameo bothered you then by the logic of being repetitive you should have loathed those ones, too.

    I feel it's repetitive just like the other things I mentioned above. But it makes sense in the context of the story. I didn't need to spoon fed how Crane was busted out either when I just saw Bane release 1000 inmates from a prison.

    No it's not any better in terms of repeating something we've already seen. But TDKR is guilty of that in other much bigger areas than that.

    Crane's role was a cameo. So tiny that it's practically insignificant if not for the fact that he's condemning people to death.

    I usually stop when I feel the discussion has run it's course. It has not reached that point yet.

    Being in the Batcave doesn't mean he was Batman when he was. He was in the Batcave in this scene you mentioned. Was he Batman then? No.

    How does that support your theory?

    Ok fine, but if you want further proof, go watch the character special features when you get your blu-ray copy. Nolan spells out Bruce's leg injury and need for a cane is from the fall with Harvey Dent at the end of TDK.

    Two ways to look at this;

    1. Between Joker and Dent, the mob was severely crippled. Joker killed Gambol and the Chechen. Dent killed Maroni. Joker also took over the underworld. That would have taken some time to recover from.

    2. Who says someone didn't step in for Maroni and they got nailed by the Dent Act?

    Yes. Tailor made for Crane who loves fear. Sentencing terrified people to terrible fates.

    "Sold to the man in the cold sweat".

    He was loving their fear.

    Was the mob as severely damaged at the end of Begins as it was in TDK? Were several of it's key members murdered? Were 549 of them locked up? Did a 'freak' take over the underworld?

    Where would he be? How about cured and in a prison cell thanks to Batman's antidote.

    That's not pivotal. Do you know what pivotal means? It means essential/vital/critical.

    The help of the Blackgate inmates was none of that.

    That's good. Your choice of wording is just off.

    What difference would it make? Comparisons would have happened no matter what.

    Yes so?

    For the simple fact he's not the main villain. Can you give me an example in ANY movie ever where a cameo character was talked about more than the main characters?

    Any movie you like. Doesn't have to be confined to superhero ones.

    That's my point right here. All of those are your own personal opinion. For instance McKellan's Magneto is more popular than Fassbender's. Lex Luthor certainly more than Zod.

    How are they biased? Because they don't agree with you?

    As you wish.

    It didn't over shadow him because cameos never do.

    http://forums.superherohype.com/showthread.php?t=369001

    A highlight. Did it overshadow the discussions of the movie's characters? No.

    Yes they were. One bad movie doesn't mean the characters are suddenly rubbish. Have you seen the excitement of seeing Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellan in the next X-Men movies? People didn't lose interest in them just because X-Men 3 was bad.

    How did it contradict continuity?
     
    #64
  15. Compi716

    Compi716 The SHH! Jew

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2002
    Messages:
    8,582
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah, I'll say it: I think this would've been pretty great. Having Batman locked in Arkham, surrounded by the freaks he put there, would have been so epic. During the lead up to TDK, I was seriously hoping the third film would have a Dark Victory-style Arkham breakout, with Scarecrow, Joker and Two-Face at the front and center.
     
    #65
  16. Ryan

    Ryan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,315
    Likes Received:
    1
    I was pulling for a Dark Victory or Arkham Asylum styled TDKR as well.
     
    #66
  17. JackWhite

    JackWhite Third Man

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Messages:
    3,597
    Likes Received:
    0
    Who wouldn't have wanted to see this played out with Bale-Bats and Heath-Joker?

    [​IMG]
     
    #67
  18. Anno_Domini

    Anno_Domini Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    17,997
    Likes Received:
    0
    The "problem" is that since he didn't, once again, it seemed like just using another plot we've seen already of Crane being just the pawn. If Nolan can't think of something else for Crane when he's deserving of something better, he shouldn't have been used the same way as was in BB.

    Ehh, I never said I enjoyed the idea of the LoS wanting to destroy Gotham City again, only that I liked the "false hope" idea that Bane wanted to use as part of his plan.

    But of course someone would bring up all the things that happens again just because I didn't like one thing. Is it so bad to not like something; apparently you do but yet we can't harp on you? No offense, but it seems like when you or someone else that doesn't like TDKR makes their complaints, they get re-quoted and their posts are agreed upon, but one mention of me not liking Crane's cameo or thinking it's even necessary and it goes through the roof.

    So you didn't need to be 'spoon fed' into how Crane, one person, was released out of Arkham? I think it's rather important in finding out how they were able to get only one person out of Arkham Asylum.

    I've really already said my reasons above, so I won't repeat myself, lol.

    Could he have been Batman? Yes. Could he have not? Yes. Both theories, really.

    Because if Maroni could take control of Falcone's mob in a matter of days, then someone could have easily done the same after Maroni's death and Batman would need to be around until the day the mobs could no longer have a stronghold over Gotham, i.e., the formation of the Dent Act.

    But even that, the injury would have to get worse and worse for it to be in the condition he's in eight years later. Bruce could still be able to do what he can until that moment, could he not?

    Wouldn't it only take as much time as it was for the mobs to recover after Falcone was sent away?

    Depends on how long you think it took for the Dent Act to be created and put into law.

    Ehh, I guess if you look at Crane being used because fear was a theme once again used in TDKR, but I feel that anyone could have done this. Crane can be thought of by being used on a thematic level.

    I would say yes, it was just as damaged. The "heads" were sent away or killed off and I doubt all 549 were low level guys that couldn't get their way out of jail time.

    Then once again, I comment the fact that why would Dent mention Falcone's time being in Arkham is the reason Maroni took control of the mob. Did it happen THAT fast?

    They weren't anything like unsubstantial though because they did expand Bane's army.

    Only saying the comparisons would have been even more if Joker had anything to do with Batman in TDKR, that's all.

    Just saying why Joker would be compared even more. With more stuff to do in TDKR, that would be only more for Joker's favor. It would be as if Bane has no means by even being somewhat of a close threat to Joker.

    What about Hannibal Lector being talked about more than the villain of Buffalo Bill?

    But still, Joker WOULD be talked about showing up in another film as one of the greatest CBM villains, yes? I don't know why you even asked about my favorite villains.

    Spider-Man fans that would throw **** at any other CBMs. That would make them biased.

    But once again, we never had a scenario of the most popular villain in a specific series showing up in another film where they're not the main villain.

    Lol, just shows how sad Spider-Man 3 is when there has to be a thread to bring up what is actually liked about the film, but needless to say, but I don't really get your point. No one really is bringing up any of the villains, only specific battles or the birth of either Sandman or Venom. I am guilty to even mention the latter two.

    Were there any discussions of any of the villains except their births or fight scenes? No.

    I am excited too, but I also thought X-Men 3 wasn't terribly bad. I enjoy it much more than Spider-Man 3, but Wolverine: Origins was indeed the most disliked X-Men film, and also my most disliked X-Men film.

    Xavier walking; a teen Emma Frost who can turn into diamonds, although not using telepathic powers, could very well be the Emma Frost we know even though we see an older one in X-Men: First Class.

    Something of Dark Victory? Yes, but we sorta gets hints from that even with Robin being introduced and Catwoman being used. Also, Catwoman heading to Italy anyone?

    But an AA-styled TDKR was never going to happen though. It really wouldn't make sense with it being aligned in Nolan's series.

    I don't know how it would've played out of Ledger was alive and if Joker shows up in TDKR, but I just don't think we'd be seeing Joker in Arkham, only out and about in Gotham.
     
    #68
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2012
  19. Victarion

    Victarion Iron Captain

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Messages:
    20,513
    Likes Received:
    0
    I liked the idea of Bane throwing Bruce into Arkham, releasing the prisoners and cutting off any access from Arkham to the rest of Gotham. A nod to the AA comic and it could still simulate the hellhole Bane grew up in. The rest of the prisoners from the old Pit could be in his army.
     
    #69
  20. The Joker

    The Joker The Clown Prince of Crime

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2003
    Messages:
    49,571
    Likes Received:
    111
    Like you've seen a plot already of the LOS trying to destroy Gotham with a doomsday device, and an Al Ghul at the center of it pretending to be someone they're not.

    But less than 2 minutes of Crane playing a Judge bothers you.

    It's mind boggling.

    He wasn't used the same as in BB. He had a prominent role and was a major factor in the LOS scheme. Here was just being a Judge during the siege. Nothing he did was essential to the LOS plan. They just gave him the job of sentencing the guilty.

    Oh so you dislike Bane's plan, too, then?

    You're being needlessly dramatic. Your chief complaint with Crane's 2 minutes of screen time is that it is a repeat of the furniture of BB. Well so is half of TDKR. That's why I raised it. It's applicable to the nature of your argument here.

    So why is a cameo more annoying to you than the other large more prominent repetitive stuff?

    You think it's important to find out how someone who had full control of the city and could do anything they wanted had one person set free from Arkham?

    Seriously you're saying that?

    That ship has long sailed lol :cwink:

    No, not really when everyone else in the movie, and the director of the movie say not.

    That is entirely dependent on when the Dent Act went into effect, or if indeed anyone did take over the Maroni's place.

    Two pieces of information you do not have.

    No, he couldn't, because at the end of TDK he is limping and stumbling when he's being chased by the Cops. Batman's not going to be going out fighting crime with ANY kind of physical impairment like a limp.

    If he was still required as Batman, he'd have seen to it that he repaired his injury by seeking medical assistance like he did when he decided to go back into action in TDKR. But he didn't.

    Do you equate Falcone being put away to several head mob guys being murdered, 549 of their number being jailed, and the Joker taking over their territory?

    8 years since that's when Batman hung up his cape and cowl.

    "And the eight year period is about showing that he’s retired in a sense, that he’s hung up his cape and his cowl. But he hasn’t been able to move on, he’s stuck."

    http://www.flicksandbits.com/2012/0...an-interview-for-the-dark-knight-rises/28690/

    Anyone could have done it but not anyone would enjoy it as much as Crane, and anyone has not proven devotion, obedience, and competence to the LOS in Gotham like Crane.

    Think hard before you pursue this one with me; you are going to try and argue with me now that Falcone's lone incarceration is the equivalent to several head mob guys being killed, 549 of the mob being locked up, their money being burned, and a freak taking over their turf.

    In as much detail you can, counteract how Falcone's incarceration is as devastating as all of that to the mob.

    Yeah, so how is this like the end of Batman Begins?

    "The mid level guys can't make bail. They can't afford to be off the streets long enough for trial and appeal. They'll cut deals that include some jail time"

    So one of two things are happening with them according to Dent;

    1. They're staying in jail

    or

    2. They're making deals by selling out other mob heads to get reduced sentences

    Either way the mob is taking damage.

    Yes. When a huge crime empire loses it's leader, they don't put a wanted ad in the newspaper. They appoint someone to take over all those rackets and operations A.S.A.P.

    Given how filthy and corrupt Gotham was back then, the line would be forming around the block.

    Yeah, the bolstered Bane's already healthy ranks. That's helpful, but not pivotal.

    Unless the Joker was carrying out a master plan of his own that rivaled Bane's villainous antics in TDKR, a cameo would not damage Bane's villainous status in the movie.

    Three things;

    1. That's not a cameo. That's two villains in the same movie.

    2. Lecter's material was infinitely more deep and compelling than Buffalo Bill's

    3. A more prominent and superior actor played Lecter

    Yes, nobody said there wouldn't be any talk. Just that it wouldn't dominate everything else like you're suggesting.

    I wanted to see whom you consider the best villains so I can gauge how you measure the kind of villains who would cause a sensation.

    Anno, this is just conjectural bias on your part. I've seen plenty of Batman fans do the same thing. And other Marvel fans, not just Spidey ones.

    But I don't taint the whole fan base with the same brush. You're going to have to do a lot better than just some flimsy accusation that the Spidey fans base hate all other CBMs.

    Oh so it has to be a villain, and not just a popular character?

    Explain what's the difference.

    The point is you don't see anyone say anything positive about Spider-Man 3. There's ten pages of it for you, and you're among the contributors.

    http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=21649601&postcount=11

    http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=21652419&postcount=25

    http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=21660197&postcount=61

    http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=21669609&postcount=72

    That's just from the first three pages, and nothing to do with fights or birth scenes. This was just the first thread that came to hand because it's on the first page of the Spider-Man 1,2,3 forum.

    I can show you more if you want?

    Yes there was. Tons of it. Are you kidding with this?

    http://forums.superherohype.com/showthread.php?t=270765&highlight=review

    Take a good look through that for starters.

    Your personal movie preferences aside, it doesn't change the fact that X-Men 3 is vastly unpopular with the fan base, and it has not damaged the fan love for Xavier and Magneto played by Stewart and McKellan.

    Xavier was seen walking at the start of X-Men 3, too. It's never established in that continuity when he lost the use of it's legs. It's First Class which came AFTER Wolverine which decided to ignore the continuity of the previous movies in that regard, and several others.

    Same with Emma Frost.
     
    #70
  21. Shikamaru

    Shikamaru Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    7,779
    Likes Received:
    7
    Bane was probably not even in Nolan's original plan for TDKR before Heath died.
     
    #71
  22. JackWhite

    JackWhite Third Man

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Messages:
    3,597
    Likes Received:
    0
    If not Bane, then I wonder who then? I really doubt he would have used the Joker again as the main antagonist. Nolan clearly stated he felt Riddler was a Joker knock-off pretty much.

    Bane really fit the bill when it came to being an extremely fresh villain to use, who both has intellect and can do what no other villain had done before on film - test Batman physically.
     
    #72
  23. Shikamaru

    Shikamaru Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    7,779
    Likes Received:
    7
    Joker was going to come back for sure. He was either going to be the main villain again, a minor villain, or one of the main villains (in case of multiple villains). Nolan himself stated many times he had plans for the Joker in TDKR.

    We don't know who Nolan was originally going to use other than the Joker but we can't be quick to assume that it's Bane. It could've been Bane (highly doubt it since he said he doesn't want to redo villains done in live-action before and when asked about Catwoman, he said "I needed a whole movie to explain why one guy would dress up as a bat!") but at the same time, it could've been anyone else too. It could've also been a guy like Black Mask. You never know.
     
    #73
  24. The Eradicator

    The Eradicator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2005
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    If Heath had lived, there is definitely a possibility that Bane might never have shown up in this trilogy. Hell, I don't even think Nolan would have ended this trilogy the way he did if Heath had lived - Bruce would have most likely come to the conclusion that he is Batman for life, and there is no hanging up the cape and cowl.

    Nolan probably would have used one other villain to supplement the Joker in an alternate TDKR. If not Bane, then my hunch is that it most likely would have been Hugo Strange.

    Speaking of Hugo Strange, any remember those rumors way back in 2010 about TDKR being based on Prey? Those were interesting times, to say the least.
     
    #74
  25. BlueLightning

    BlueLightning Caballero de la Luz

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,483
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think there was a plan for a third film at that moment though.
     
    #75

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"