Abuse of Power Thread (Cops, Governments, Etc.) - Part 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
They had to arrest this cop.

The video of the police officer planting evidence?

They HAD to.
 
How often does this happen though?

Only God knows, unfortunately.
 
How often does this happen though?

Only God knows, unfortunately.
It is the exact reason why cameras should always be used, and why cops don't want them. It amazes me how cops can kill and ruin peoples lives and face no punishment. Just have to lie.
 
It is the exact reason why cameras should always be used, and why cops don't want them. It amazes me how cops can kill and ruin peoples lives and face no punishment. Just have to lie.

I was all for the cops using cameras but...no. Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, the shooting at the Walmart...all caught on camera. And still nothing. Yes, this cop was apprehended but who knows how his case could go. Nothing shocks me anymore.
 
I was all for the cops using cameras but...no. Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, the shooting at the Walmart...all caught on camera. And still nothing. Yes, this cop was apprehended but who knows how his case could go. Nothing shocks me anymore.
That is a fair point. Cops still literally get away with murder, even when caught on camera.
 
There is an article I posted a few pages back about how body cameras are marketed in the sense that they will be good for getting cops off in the event of a dispute. Good read
 
It is the exact reason why cameras should always be used, and why cops don't want them. It amazes me how cops can kill and ruin peoples lives and face no punishment. Just have to lie.

I know MANY police officers, and 100% of them want the cameras....the Houston Police Union wants the cameras...along with most other big city Police Unions out there.

The vast majority of police officers out there are nothing like what you just described.

Many of the investigations in some of the larger cities have found that the body cameras have actually helped the police in more instances than not.....
 
Last edited:
I know MANY police officers, and 100% of them want the cameras....the Houston Police Union wants the cameras...

The vast majority of police officers out there are nothing like what you just described.
I get the idea that most cops are good, but the "We protect our own" culture places a the vast majority of cops in the position of having to protect the bad ones.

Also if the vast majority of cops are for cameras, why do we continually see stories where cops threaten and attempt to take phones away from people recording them, even though it is quite legal for people to do so? How come LA police were found to continually tamper with their recording equipment?

It is easy to say you want the cameras. Just like it is easy for all athletes to say they are clean. What actually happens is very, very different. Cops lie, they do it all the time, and we see it all the time.

Many of the investigations in some of the larger cities have found that the body cameras have actually helped the police in more instances than not.....
Of course. Which is a good thing. Also doesn't hurt when the camera just stops working at the most convenient time. Like the recent situation where an officer who thought the camera wasn't working when planted drugs on someone.
 
The FBI Lets Criminals Walk in Order to Keep This Device a Secret

jsbkfsgmved7jmkmomzv.jpg


The Federal Bureau of Investigation is notoriously secretive about its cell phone tracking tools known as Stingrays. Now, new documents obtained by the ACLU show how the Feds keep their surveillance gadgets shrouded in mystery: the FBI makes cops dismiss criminal cases if they threaten to reveal secrets about Stingrays.

The American Civil Liberties Union received an unredacted copy of a six-page non-disclosure agreement between the FBI and the Erie County Sheriff’s Department, once a court ordered that the ACLU had a right to request the information.

The agreement explicitly outlines the many steps local law enforcement needs to take in order to have permission to use the Stingrays, which are made by the Harris Corporation. Here’s the directive to stop prosecuting to protect the technology:

“In addition, the Erie County Sheriff’s Office will, at the request of the FBI, seek dismissal of the case in lieu of using or providing or allowing others to use or provide any information concerning the Harris Corporation wireless collection equipment/technology, its associated software, operating manuals, and any related documentation”​

The agreement hamstrings local law enforcement to a point where it has to ask the FBI permission to reveal anything related to Stingray use.

Think about this: While insisting that the bad guys will win if anyone finds out anything about a powerful surveillance tool, the FBI is willing to let other criminals walk free to avoid having to reveal its secrets.

And that isn’t the only disturbing thing revealed by the records. They show that Erie County only obtained a court order to use Stingrays once, even though there were 47 documented uses.

The FBI’s tight-lipped party line has been, over and over again, that releasing any information about Stingrays will help the bad guys. That’s what FBI Director James Comey said when he finally addressed Stingrays, and that’s the line trickling down to local enforcement using the devices. Look at the original FOIA denial from Erie County to the ACLU, which rejected the request on the basis that it would jeopardize criminal investigations and “could if disclosed endanger the life and safety of a person.”

A judge ruled that this “but the bad guys will win and someone could DIE if we tell you” denial failed to follow the law.

This code of silence is far too broad. Of course, the FBI and local law enforcement should not be made to reveal specific deployments of surveillance tech in ongoing investigations. But none of the information that has come out of the disclosures about Stingrays has rendered the technology less effective. What these public disclosures have done is show how law enforcement has tried to minimize any oversight about the use of these powerful devices, oversight that is set up to protect privacy rights. Nobody wants the FBI to be impotent. But letting the FBI operate with impunity is another matter.

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/th...e-fbi-makes-police-sign-to-use-spy-technology

That is really not good in any way
 
Police in India Will Use Weaponized Pepper Spray Drones on Protesters

emqktqu0n0kxmje6ktat.jpg


Indian police recently purchased five drones so they could dump pepper spray on protesters during political demonstrations.

The police force in Lucknow, India (population 2 million) is prepping the drones to start releasing pepper spray as a form of crowd control, starting next month.

Yashasvi Yadav, police chief of Lucknow, said his officers have successfully test-flown the newly purchased drones with a view to better crowd control.

“The results were brilliant. We have managed to work out how to use it to precisely target the mob in winds and congested areas,” Yadav told AFP.​

Law enforcement all over the world, including in the United States, are using drones as a policing tool. Mostly, they’re getting prepped as surveillance tools. This is the first case where a drone has been weaponized in this way for use against the public. But it’s highly unlikely to be the last.

Drone makers have been preparing and marketing domestic surveillance drones as potential weapons for years already. Vanguard Defense Industries, for instance, has been touting its ability to provide cops with drones that shoot tear gas, buckshot, and grenades since 2012. And using drones as more than just surveillance tools is something that some law enforcement in the U.S. are considering. Some police departments have been actively discussing incorporating weaponized drones into their arsenal.

Now, what flies in Uttar Pradesh won’t necessarily get the same approval in the U.S., but the introduction of this kind of domestic weapon drone internationally underlines that these unmanned aircraft are explicitly being designed for police crowd control.

http://news.yahoo.com/indian-police-pepper-spraying-drones-unruly-protesters-155750698.html

Yikes
 
DEA Was Dragnet Spying on Billions of American Phone Calls for Decades

eynhthajmvvf5bxud1n9.jpg


Indiscriminate spying was the DEA’s blunt force weapon of choice in its “War on Drugs.” The Drug Enforcement Agency and the Justice Department tracked billions of Americans’ phone calls, even people not suspected of crimes, for decades—and it looks like collateral damage wasn’t much of a concern.

New details from a USA Today investigation made it very clear that the scope of the DEA’s surveillance program, which it admitted to in January, was huge. Catch up with a friend in Montreal between the 1992 and 2013? Call home from a trip to Rome? There’s a good chance the government was keeping track.

For more than two decades, the Justice Department and the Drug Enforcement Administration amassed logs of virtually all telephone calls from the USA to as many as 116 countries linked to drug trafficking, current and former officials involved with the operation said. The targeted countries changed over time but included Canada, Mexico and most of Central and South America.​

Surveillance wasn’t limited to people suspected of, you know, drug trafficking or even associating with people in the drug trafficking community or even smoking the occasional doob. Instead, the DEA scooped up almost everyone’s international calls on its sketchy country list, just in case. So basically, anyone who had foreign friends or liked to use their passport to travel was now suspect enough for government surveillance.

The DEA did not record the content of the calls, but kept meticulous records and queried the database on a daily basis to root up potential drug connections, looking at the logs and where people where when they made calls.

The DEA used its data collection extensively and in ways that the NSA is now prohibited from doing. Agents gathered the records without court approval, searched them more often in a day than the spy agency does in a year and automatically linked the numbers the agency gathered to large electronic collections of investigative reports, domestic call records accumulated by its agents and intelligence data from overseas.​

In most cases, it appears the foreign governments were OK with the dragnet. Obviously, so were George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama, since the program continued over the course of their presidencies. And phone companies’ cooperation was integral to the plan:

The DEA did not have a real-time connection to phone companies’ data; instead, the companies regularly provided copies of their call logs, first on computer disks and later over a private network. Agents who used the system said the numbers they saw were seldom more than a few days old.​

Again, this went on for decades. Decades! It only stopped in September 2013, after Edward Snowden went public with his knowledge of the NSA’s similar surveillance program. The DEA program is a clear precursor to the NSA program.

As news of the details of this intrusive program gets out, it’s already facing backlash. Human Rights Watch is filing a lawsuit to stop all continuing DEA bulk data collection.

Oh, and the reason this program got shut down? Well, it was getting less useful as the drug community started using the internet to talk, which is why the DEA hates how hard it is to spy on iMessages.

But it mostly got shut down to make the government look like its employees weren’t lying through their bureaucratic teeth. Government officials realized they would be flagrantly lying saying they only conducted bulk surveillance to stop terrorists, not to nab weed suppliers.

Officials said the Justice Department told the DEA that it had determined it could not continue both surveillance programs, particularly because part of its justification for sweeping NSA surveillance was that it served national security interests, not ordinary policing.​

The mere existence of this DEA program quadruple underlines, in flaming red permanent marker, that the government’s surveillance programs are, as a matter of historical record, not solely guided by national security interests.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/04/07/dea-bulk-telephone-surveillance-operation/70808616/

What the hell? There is no excuse for this BS
 
UPDATE: Cop Who Killed Walter Scott Fired From South Carolina Police Force

couzunfnabonglv4xy0n.jpg


Michael T. Slager—the white police officer arrested Tuesday and charged with murder after video surfaced of him gunning down an unarmed black man, Walter L. Scott—has been fired from the North Charleston, S.C. police force. He had served for five years.

In video of the April 4 shooting first obtained by the Post and Courier, Slager can be seen firing at Scott as he flees in a lot adjacent to a muffler shop; the officer fires eight shots before Scott, 50, falls to the ground. Slager, 31, can then be seen in the footage appearing to plant his Taser near Scott's body as more officers arrive at the scene.

Eddie Driggers, the North Charleston police chief, told reporters Wednesday that proper procedures were “obviously not" followed in the aftermath of the shooting. The town's mayor, Keith Sumney, the New York Times reports, issued an executive order Wednesday that all police officers start wear body cameras. Officials with the police department also told reporters that Slager's eight-months-pregnant wife will continue to receive health insurance.

Slager's former attorney, David Aylor, told the Daily Beast that he dropped the officer as his client after the video was released Tuesday.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ger-south-carolina-officer-walter-scott-fired

Doesn't look like this racist a**hole will get away with this, although I did see a bunch of other racist a**holes have started a GoFundMe for his defense
 
Michael Slager Has an Alleged History of Violence Against Black Men

w9lakfcbalbdwt5xmfiv.jpg


Walter Scott was not the first unarmed black man to suffer the violence of North Charleston Police Officer Michael Slager, according to documents obtained by the Associated Press. In 2013, Slager allegedly pulled a man from his home and Tasered him multiple times, despite that man being unarmed and having committed no crime.

Slager arrived at the home of Mario Givens before dawn, banging on the door, according to an excessive force complaint and incident report, corroborated with interviews by the AP. Slager was looking for Mario's brother, Matthew Givens, who had allegedly entered his ex-girlfriend's bedroom uninvited and fled when she called the police. Mario Givens answered the door and was Tasered and pulled from the house shortly thereafter:

"Come outside or I'll tase you," he quoted the officer as saying, adding: "I didn't want that to happen to me, so I raised my arms over my head, and when I did, he tased me in my stomach anyway."

Givens said the pain from the stun gun was so intense that he dropped to the floor and began calling for his mother, who also was in the home. At that point, he said another police officer came into the house and they dragged him outside and threw him to the ground. He was handcuffed and put in a squad car.​

Maleah Kiara Brown, Matthew Givens' ex-girlfriend, accompanied the officers to the Givens' home. She told the AP that she'd told them what Matthew looked like, and that Mario "looked nothing like the description I gave the officers." Matthew Givens is 5'5", and Mario stands "well over six feet," according to the AP. According to Brown, Slager Tasered Mario once more after he'd thrown him on the dirt. "[Slager] was cocky. It looked like he wanted to hurt him," she said.

Mario Givens was charged with resisting arrest, but those charges were dropped. An internal investigation sparked after Givens filed a complaint found Slager not guilty of wrongdoing.

The incident report—Slager's official account of the struggle—differs significantly, arguing that Mario and Matthew looked "just alike" and that he was forced to use the Taser because Givens struggled with him. The report also contains a witness statement from Brown—which Brown denies giving.

Slager's recounting bears similarities to his incident report on Walter Scott, which claimed that Scott took Slager's Taser during a scuffle, and that Slager fired his weapon because he "felt threatened." The video, of course, told a different story.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/09/michael-slager-excessive-force_n_7032212.html

Makes you wonder how many times he pulled crap like this and didn't get caught.
 
Secret Service Suspends Manager Accused of Sexually Assaulting Employee

ik16zvkrzxrkbnjuhwqa.jpg


According to a report in the Washington Post, the Secret Service has suspended Xavier Morales, a security clearance manager for the department, after one of his employees accused him of making unwanted sexual advances in the division's Washington headquarters.

At a work party at a restaurant in downtown Washington on March 31, the woman told police, Morales allegedly told her that "he was in love with her and would like to have sex with her." After returning to the office after the party, Morales then allegedly "tried to kiss her and grabbed her arms when she resisted." Sources told the Post that "the two scuffled until Morales relented."

The Secret Service placed Morales on leave last week after the woman made a formal complaint that Thursday. From the Post:

Late last week, the Secret Service took the unusual step of placing Morales on indefinite administrative leave and adding his name to an internal “do not admit” list prohibiting entry to the office, a Secret Service official said. The Secret Service also took away his gun and badge after agency investigators launched a preliminary review of the complaint and conducted “subsequent corroborative interviews” Thursday afternoon, said agency spokesman Brian Leary.​

Because of Morales' senior ranking, NBC News reports, the Department of Homeland Security's Office of the Inspector General and D.C. police's sex crimes unit will investigate the allegation.

Morales, 48, was promoted to his position by new Secret Service Director Joseph Clancy last October. Ironically, as the Post notes, Morales job makes him "responsible for determining when agents, through misconduct or other action, have jeopardized their security clearances and should lose their jobs."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...31c412-ddf9-11e4-a500-1c5bb1d8ff6a_story.html

That guy needs some jail time
 
I'd gladly welcome some Canadian train of thoughts for most of the police here in the states
 
"Sir please stop shooting at me!"
"**** you pig!"
"Sir, that was uncalled for."
 
"Sir please stop shooting at me!"
"**** you pig!"
"Sir, that was uncalled for."

Yeah, still preferable to police officers shooting unarmed people and planting weapons on them.

Criminals should be the corrupt sociopaths, not those entrusted with enforcing laws.
 
Dashcam Captures Florida Cop Fatally Shooting Mentally Ill Man

Vid on YT, search for: Video shows shooting of Miami Gardens man Lavall Hall (graphic language)

In dashcam footage released today by the family of 25-year-old Lavall Hall—the mentally ill man shot and killed by Miami Gardens, Fla. police officer Eddo Trimino in February—the officer can be heard shouting, "Get on the f***ing ground or you're dead!" before firing five times.

As the Miami Herald reports, the shooting occurred Feb. 15, after police were called to Hall's home by his mother, who found her son standing outside nearly naked and waving a broomstick. According to CBS Miami, Hall's mother, Catherine Daniels, told officers that her son was diagnosed schizophrenic.

When police approached Hall, officers say, he became "agitated" and starting swinging the broomstick—one officer reportedly required stitches. Officers then reportedly fired Tasers at Hall, to no avail; after giving chase, Trimino caught up with Hall. When Hall apparently refused orders to lower himself to the ground, the officer fired five shots, killing Hall.

The attorney representing Hall's family released a 19-minute clip from the officers' dashcam to reporters Wednesday (a condensed version of that video, with a slow-motion effect added by Hall's family). The intervening moments not depicted in the edited video as described by the Herald:

Ehrlich’s vehicle moves slowly down the street past the family’s home. As the video pans the street and homes, the patrol car’s bright lights illuminate the way. At one point Ehrlich can be heard saying that Hall is walking around with a broom in his hand, and says, “Every time I go near him he walks away.”

Then there is a split-second shot of Hall holding a broomstick, before he disappears. A few minutes later Hall is seen racing toward Ehrlich’s patrol car, then away from it. Hall is not seen again. Ehrlich can be heard saying, “Hey, easy,” at some point during a confrontation. Then Trimino’s commands can be heard clearly.​

Trimino's lawyer, meanwhile, claims the video demonstrates that the officer feared for his life and was acting in self-defense.

“You’re trained to shoot at the center body mass. So it’s going to be a bit of a lower trajectory of the gun,” Trimino’s attorney, Andrew Axelrad told the Herald. “He’s not shooting at eye level, that’s in the movies. The video justifies the officer’s actions. You can see his fear.”

As the Herald notes, the last time a Florida police officer was indicted in a shooting death was in 1989.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article17882108.html

We really need to do something about how the mentally ill are handled by the police in this country
 
Last edited:
NYPD Cop Suspended After Allegedly Stealing $3,000 from Deli During Raid

hsrdvdjmdabpsfhfozow.jpg


One member of New York's finest has been placed on suspension pending an investigation into claims that he stole $3,000 in cash from a deli that was being raided for allegedly peddling untaxed cigarettes. The suspects accused of selling loosies were arrested on the scene.

ABC 7 spoke with Ali Abdullah, owner of the Bed Stuy deli, who noticed that the cash was missing from a box under the register on Saturday, the day after the raid. He reviewed surveillance footage, thinking one of his employees was to blame, but instead saw a detective duck behind the counter and take the money.

He says the video clearly shows one of the detectives grabbing the stack of money, hiding behind the counter door and out of view of his supervisor, before putting what appears to be the money in his coat pocket.

"When I look at my system, I see the officer took the money," he said. "It's crazy."​

The sticky-fingered cop is now subject of a joint investigation between internal affairs and the Brooklyn DA.

http://7online.com/news/exclusive-b...s-detective-stealing-cash-during-raid/644309/

Vid at the link, another dirty cop
 
UPDATE: Man Who Filmed Walter Scott Killing: "I Felt My Life Might Be in Danger"

rotnlcdydpjawdgkq3qp.jpg


Feidin Santana, the 23-year-old man who caught the murder of Walter Scott on his cell phone camera as he was passing by in North Charleston, South Carolina on Saturday, has now spoken out about the ordeal and what instigated him to begin filming the incident as it unraveled.

Santana appeared on several news talk shows to describe the events that occurred on Saturday afternoon, including MSNBC's Morning Joe and TODAY with Matt Lauer. Santana was walking to his job when he saw a police officer, Michael Slager, 33, in pursuit of 50-year-old Walter Scott. He saw the officer chase after Scott, after which Santana decided to hang up his phone call and begin filming. Via NBC News:

“I was hearing the Taser sound,” he said, “and the yelling of Mr. Scott, and that’s when I decided to do the recording.”

He told NBC News that at first the two men were on the ground.

“I remember the police [officer] had control of the situation,” he said. “He had control of Scott. And Scott was trying just to get away from the Taser. But like I said, he never used the Taser against the cop.”​

On NBC Nightly News, Feidin told host Lester Holt that after capturing the shooting on video, he knew that he had "something on his hands." Though Feidin initially went to the police with the video, they told him to wait, and he decided to instead pass the video onto the attorneys of the family of Walter Scott. As he tells Holt in this clip, "Mr. Scott didn't deserve this."

In an interview with TODAY's Matt Lauer, Feidin explained that after the clip was released, he has now begun to fear for his life.

"I felt that my life, with this information, might be in danger. I thought about erasing the video and just getting out of the community, you know Charleston, and living some place else," the 23-year-old [told Chris Hayes]. "I knew the cop didn't do the right thing." [...]

"I say life changed in a matter of seconds. I never thought this would happen, that I would be a witness," he told TODAY's Matt Lauer in an exclusive interview Thursday. "I'm still scared."​

On Morning Joe, when asked how he found the courage to film the shooting, especially as police officer Slager turned and looked directly at him, Santana said he believed god put him there for a reason. Via the Washington Post:

Asked how he summoned up the courage to shoot the footage in full view of police, he said on “Morning Joe:” “I don’t know what happened to me at that moment to be honest. I’m a great believer in God. Maybe he put me there for some reason.”​

Michael Slager has since been fired from the police force and charged with murder, but one wonders if this would be the case without Santana's video as evidence.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-to-murder-charge-against-south-carolina-cop/

I would be scared in his situation as well
 
Dash cam vid of Scott taking off- https://***********/AC360/status/586277504899534848

Why did he run?

At some point cop shouts - "taser...taser..taser.." Don't know if it's to his partner or to Scott?
 
Last edited:
Running away doesn't mean he should have been shot in the back. The witness who filmed it said at no point did the man take the cops taser
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,327
Messages
22,086,534
Members
45,885
Latest member
RadioactiveMan
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"