Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]525677[/split]
I wonder if a modern-set WW movie where all the magical, mythological elements are set within modern culture/settings will not smack too much of the PercyJackson/MortalInstruments-type movie that has not been that successful these days. But thinking of a back-to-Themyscira movie with the magical aspects set there makes me remember the Clash-of-the-Titans movies were not that successful either.
It is hard to hit that sweet balance spot between the magical and the mundane that the Potter films had.
Seems reasonable. Raise money by offering a ticket to see WW at the LA premiere.
https://***********/WonderWomanFilm/status/852257526363992064
Wonder Wednesdayst:
Ahhhh... So now there's stuff I gotta avoid coming out every Wednesday until summer.![]()
"Most amazing fans in the world". Kudos to her for being able to mouth this and not choke in her own vomit.
![]()
Makes me want that long over due solo WW toon series.
You know, the greco-roman skirt just seems so obvious and natural, it makes me wonder how anyone ever thought Wonder Woman fighting in her underwear was a good idea.
Why has Aquaman got a more prestigious cast than WW? It has Nicole Kidman, Patrick Wilson, Dolph Lundgren and Willem Dafoe in addition to Amber Heard and Jason Momoa.
It would've been nice to have a few more people like that for WW. Surely actors can't be flocking more to working on Aquaman than to WW? You'd think WW might be the bigger deal.
Why has Aquaman got a more prestigious cast than WW? It has Nicole Kidman, Patrick Wilson, Dolph Lundgren and Willem Dafoe in addition to Amber Heard and Jason Momoa.
It would've been nice to have a few more people like that for WW. Surely actors can't be flocking more to working on Aquaman than to WW? You'd think WW might be the bigger deal.
The Clash of the Titans movies weren't done as well as they could have been or they might have been more popular, don't know for sure though. I definitely favour Themyscira stories or at least as much based there or other locations outside of the real world (like it looks like Ragnarok will heavily feature non-Earth locations) alongside Earth sections. The 2 Thor films to date also seemed to suffer the more exposure they had to Earth scenes although we also don't know if that is just because those scenes happened to be weak.I wonder if a modern-set WW movie where all the magical, mythological elements are set within modern culture/settings will not smack too much of the PercyJackson/MortalInstruments-type movie that has not been that successful these days. But thinking of a back-to-Themyscira movie with the magical aspects set there makes me remember the Clash-of-the-Titans movies were not that successful either.
It is hard to hit that sweet balance spot between the magical and the mundane that the Potter films had.
Yeah. This should be a great opportunity for some of the big actresses out there to turn out and help what is the definitive female superhero film make it.Why has Aquaman got a more prestigious cast than WW? It has Nicole Kidman, Patrick Wilson, Dolph Lundgren and Willem Dafoe in addition to Amber Heard and Jason Momoa.
It would've been nice to have a few more people like that for WW. Surely actors can't be flocking more to working on Aquaman than to WW? You'd think WW might be the bigger deal.
Why has Aquaman got a more prestigious cast than WW? It has Nicole Kidman, Patrick Wilson, Dolph Lundgren and Willem Dafoe in addition to Amber Heard and Jason Momoa.
It would've been nice to have a few more people like that for WW. Surely actors can't be flocking more to working on Aquaman than to WW? You'd think WW might be the bigger deal.
Yeah, look at all that prestige in this flop film. I really don't care about 'big names'. I just want the movie to be good.![]()
I was complaining about the same thing six months back, why there are no big names associated with this movie ?
I mean, why does a movie like The Huntsman: Winter's War, has more A-list cast than Wonder Woman ?
Why did actresses like Charlize Theron, Emily Blunt and Jessica Chastain decide to be a part of that movie instead of agreeing to do some role in Wonder Woman ?
Why did Cate Blanchett thought that role in Wonder Woman was not good enough but taking up a role in Marvel's Thor : Ragnarok was a good thing ?
I was complaining about the same thing six months back, why there are no big names associated with this movie ?
I mean, why does a movie like The Huntsman: Winter's War, has more A-list cast than Wonder Woman ?
Why did actresses like Charlize Theron, Emily Blunt and Jessica Chastain decide to be a part of that movie instead of agreeing to do some role in Wonder Woman ?
Why did Cate Blanchett thought that role in Wonder Woman was not good enough but taking up a role in Marvel's Thor : Ragnarok was a good thing ?
Why has Aquaman got a more prestigious cast than WW? It has Nicole Kidman, Patrick Wilson, Dolph Lundgren and Willem Dafoe in addition to Amber Heard and Jason Momoa.
It would've been nice to have a few more people like that for WW. Surely actors can't be flocking more to working on Aquaman than to WW? You'd think WW might be the bigger deal.
![]()
I was complaining about the same thing six months back, why there are no big names associated with this movie ?
I mean, why does a movie like The Huntsman: Winter's War, has more A-list cast than Wonder Woman ?
Why did actresses like Charlize Theron, Emily Blunt and Jessica Chastain decide to be a part of that movie instead of agreeing to do some role in Wonder Woman ?
Why did Cate Blanchett thought that role in Wonder Woman was not good enough but taking up a role in Marvel's Thor : Ragnarok was a good thing ?