Qwerty©;11845843 said:Was that comment really necessary?
Did it really bother you that much?
Qwerty©;11845843 said:Was that comment really necessary?
The first pic I posted looks like a video game Spidey. Is it a cool shot? Yeah. Is it great CGI? Hell no. Needs work.
I wish Spidey looked that good in a video game. I have never seen a video game with graphics that good. Can you show me what game can compare with that image you showed me? I will be impressed.
I would have been amped if Galactus looked like this in the new movie but no......he's a f***ing puff cloud![]()
![]()
![]()
Hah. I know their gig. This was on purpose. And it doesn't make me a hypocrite. I am calling them on it.Qwerty©;11843270 said:What the hell, buggs?
What those people think about SR doesn't matter. It is you who has this inexplicable need to bash SR constantly, not them who feels they have to bash SM3 to make themselves feel better.
You go on all the time about you being targeted for your opinions in the SR boards, but you are doing the exact same thing here. Hypocrite.
Heh heh. I like you.Yeah the shot with Eddie getting pulled out of the symbiote reminded me of the graphics from Sewer Shark.
You actually believe your own little delusionsHah. I know their gig. This was on purpose. And it doesn't make me a hypocrite. I am calling them on it.
i have to admit the cgi in this movie was amazing, i mean look at when spidey saves gwen that was mind blowing, it might just be me! also venom his effects were amazing and very realistic, even to aqn extent i found sandman belivable but the peace where spidey and mj a swinging in the final act where he saves her my friend said that was cgi and if so wow they did an incredable job in geting it all to look so realistic
well that just me so thanks!
nope, it isn'tsmh12, is that you?![]()
I really gre on that. Every CGI shot in this film blew me away. This is the greatest CGI has ever been and this film really proves that. The Peter vs. Harry fight looked very realistic and as I said befor so did the Crane scene. Venom was truly brought to life with lots of things including the CGI. so without the CGI then Venom wouldn't have been really brought to lifeOriginally Posted by phillip phonix![]()
i have to admit the cgi in this movie was amazing, i mean look at when spidey saves gwen that was mind blowing, it might just be me! also venom his effects were amazing and very realistic, even to aqn extent i found sandman belivable but the peace where spidey and mj a swinging in the final act where he saves her my friend said that was cgi and if so wow they did an incredable job in geting it all to look so realistic
well that just me so thanks!
Dude, they were busted in this forum bagging on the film in the SR forum. It is in a thread. And what are the odds of the two of them posting one right after the other before anyone in this forum, which is pretty lively at the moment, would post before Bosef did. But two major spiderman 3 detractors/ SR supporters post back to back before anyone here could. And, like I said, I talked to a few ex-in singer we trust guys who said this was done before. So, I am putting two and two together. And it isn't much of a stretch.Qwerty©;11853692 said:You actually believe your own little delusions![]()
Yes, there were many shots that were well done as well. I think that simply the birth of Sandman will get Sony the Oscar. I wish all of the cgi elements could have been that well executed.i have to admit the cgi in this movie was amazing, i mean look at when spidey saves gwen that was mind blowing, it might just be me! also venom his effects were amazing and very realistic, even to aqn extent i found sandman belivable but the peace where spidey and mj a swinging in the final act where he saves her my friend said that was cgi and if so wow they did an incredable job in geting it all to look so realistic
well that just me so thanks!
They can't help it if they liked SR and hated Spider-Man 3. They are allowed to criticise, you know. I would've thought you of all people would understand this.Dude, they were busted in this forum bagging on the film in the SR forum. It is in a thread. And what are the odds of the two of them posting one right after the other before anyone in this forum, which is pretty lively at the moment, would post before Bosef did. But two major spiderman 3 detractors/ SR supporters post back to back before anyone here could. And, like I said, I talked to a few ex-in singer we trust guys who said this was done before. So, I am putting two and two together. And it isn't much of a stretch.
I would have been amped if Galactus looked like this in the new movie but no......he's a f***ing puff cloud![]()
![]()
![]()
Everyone has a right to criticise. Eveyone has a right to their opinion. But to do what appears to be a co-ordinated attacking thread in another superhero's movie thread just because of sour grapes is immature. And I think everyone here on this board will agree. They should be happy because this keeps the superhero movies looking very lucrative for studios to make. But instead, because another hero movie is beating the pants off of their prefferred hero in the box office, making their hero's movie look worse because of it, they have to deride it. And don't go into anohter hero's section here to do it.Qwerty©;11859926 said:They can't help it if they liked SR and hated Spider-Man 3. They are allowed to criticise, you know. I would've thought you of all people would understand this.
I thought it was okay, they really messed up the symbiote's movements though. It's supposed to be a puddle slithering across the ground, WTF is up with the flipping around thing!? But then again they completely screwed up Venom anyways so...