2014 had The Winter Soldier in April (International Markets started showing it mid-late March), and then GotG in early August (International Markets started showing late/end of July).I bet there won't be any change though, because even if someone's home team is knocked out, people will switch to supporting another one. Football fever will continue for the next month.
I don't remember what happened to other MCU films during previous World Cups. Were these pushed back? Was there a film in 2014?
2014 had The Winter Soldier in April (International Markets started showing it mid-late March), and then GotG in early August (International Markets started showing late/end of July).
Well only a handful of the reviews are raving about it, but most are saying "it's a pretty fun time," even a few of the negative ones. That should be a pretty hopeful sign for fans.

Fair warning, this is probably the closest Marvel has ever been to a straight out and out comedy.
Well, for me, I'll just leave it at saying that's your opinion. As you probably can guess, I strongly disagree.
For the record, Ebert liked or loved every one of the Nolan movies he was alive to review, except ironically Memento (I wonder if he changed his mind on that later). He called TDK near perfect and that it "redefines the possibilities of the comic book movie."
For Inception, here is Ebert's take on the "middle brow" filmmaker:
"It's said that Christopher Nolan spent ten years writing his screenplay for "Inception." That must have involved prodigious concentration, like playing blindfold chess while walking a tight-wire. The film's hero tests a young architect by challenging her to create a maze, and Nolan tests us with his own dazzling maze. We have to trust him that he can lead us through, because much of the time we're lost and disoriented. Nolan must have rewritten this story time and again, finding that every change had a ripple effect down through the whole fabric.
...The movies often seem to come from the recycling bin these days: Sequels, remakes, franchises. "Inception" does a difficult thing. It is wholly original, cut from new cloth, and yet structured with action movie basics so it feels like it makes more sense than (quite possibly) it does. I thought there was a hole in "Memento:" How does a man with short-term memory loss remember he has short-term memory loss? Maybe there's a hole in "Inception" too, but I can't find it. Christopher Nolan reinvented "Batman." This time he isn't reinventing anything. Yet few directors will attempt to recycle "Inception." I think when Nolan left the labyrinth, he threw away the map."
And the first one wasn't? This isn't a bad thing.
STOP talking about Nolan.
I can now say I saw Ant-Man and the Wasp. Overall, a good sequel. It's a pretty tight and focused narrative. It's not an end of the universe stakes kind of story. It's a more personal and intimate one.
Fair warning, this is probably the closest Marvel has ever been to a straight out and out comedy. It's even more of a comedy than Thor: Ragnarok. I will say though, Paul Rudd does a good job handling and carrying the material for the most part.
The villains were more or less props so to speak to move the story along. The movie was more about Scott not trying to land back in jail, while also trying to figure out how to help Hank and Hope and redeem himself in their eyes.
I did enjoy all the large-size ant humor.
I second this. People who absolutely have to go off-topic and fight over Nolan should take it elsewhere. And the mods should enforce this.