ChrisBaleBatman
Legendary Hero
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2005
- Messages
- 19,677
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
If AC IV has done anything for me, it's highlight how empty and void of character AC 3 was. Such a vast, beautiful frontier and bloody nothing to do in it. Such a shameful waste of a great setting.
One thing I DO wish had carried over into AC IV though, is the homestead missions. I'd love to have something like that with the Jackdaw crew. It would have been great to get to know each member personally, you like you do Adewale. Really make the Jackdaw feel like it has some character and flare.
Another thing I'm noticing, from a story perspective, is the games are coming too reliant on historical figures. In the Ezio games, sure you had the villains and a few key people, but some of the strongest and most important characters were people like Claudia Auditore, La Volpe... People who were more fiction for the narrative than plucked from history. I wouldn't have minded if Edward had a few more close crew members etc to help him up. Or at least give Adewale more to do as his offsider.
Man, I really liked Claudia and La Volpe too. The theory I've heard about being more true to historical figures and them placing more significance on them is that the closer they move the timeline to ours, the more knowledgeable the players may be about the period, historical figures and whatever historical inaccuracies may come out of creating fiction.
Personally, I say **** it. Everyone should know it's fiction, and not an historical documentary. To me, anyone who will rip AC for 'historical inaccuracies' is about the same as the people who tore into "The Davinci Code", thinking it was a true story not knowing it was a work of fiction.
 
				 
						
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		