- Joined
- Jun 16, 2007
- Messages
- 57,826
- Reaction score
- 66,934
- Points
- 218
I supported Lee Pace for the role last time they were casting and I’d support him now.
Ha, my ideal replacements for Cavill and Affleck are Krasinksi and GoslingKrasinski and Gosling are the only names jumping to mind.
Krasinski was who I meant, not Pace.Lee Pace would fit the cowl so well.
Can't say that about Krasinski. Krasinski would look goofy even without the cowl. I really, really don't like that idea. Not one bit.
After reading who just got cast as Lois Lane on the CW, my go-to Supes cast is on Grimm, that includes John Henry Irons.Ha, my ideal replacements for Cavill and Affleck are Krasinksi and Gosling
I would go for Lee Pace but Jon Hamm even said himself that he wants to be the DCEU's next Batman but will Hamm get it though? I would definitely lobby for Hamm but
Bryan Cranston should’ve been Lex. He would’ve been so much better than what we got. Thanks Snyder!No. Hamm is 47. It's just like how people played themselves into believing Bryan Cranston was going to play Lex Luthor.
Lex is a character thatst mostly based in his mind and presence rather than how physical he is. A 60 year old Luthor can TOTALLY work.No. Hamm is 47. It's just like how people played themselves into believing Bryan Cranston was going to play Lex Luthor.
Lex is a character thatst mostly based in his mind and presence rather than how physical he is. A 60 year old Luthor can TOTALLY work.
Because they have seen more of his movies than “The Notebook”Why are people so in love with the idea of Gosling as Batman?
Because they have seen more of his movies than “The Notebook”
I wouldn't hate it, but I don't get what's so appealing about the guy either. He just seems bored out of his mind half the time.So have I. I'm still not sold on him as Batman/Bruce Wayne. It feels like another Ben Affleck situation.