mcflytrap said:
You aren't fit to carry Harrison's bricks of **** to the ****ter. He is a movie god and you WILL respect him.
I seriously doubt you'll look as good and be in as good as shape as he is at 64. It's easy to talk smack when your balls haven't dropped yet.
Very easy, actually, considering I DON'T HAVE BALLS.
I respect Harrison Ford's earlier work - I loved the Indy movies, I loved Air Force One, I loved the Fugitive, I loved him in Star Wars...there's no doubt that he could take a dramatic role and run with it if given the chance - I'm just not saying an action role.
Firewall was just the nail in the coffin - sure, he's great for SIXTY, but great for sixty is not as good as great for thirty, let's face it. The Indiana Jones movies were action adventure films, and if the fourth movie is going to be all about him, it will not be as good as the others as Harrison Ford is physically incapable of keeping up with his 30-year-old self. It's just nature. If the movie had to, instead of having great, original sequences featuring a younger actor (ie - the "heir" figure) - so, instead of that, they had to lower their standards and use weird effects to accomodate Ford's age, it would not be as good as the others.
That's not to say Indy couldn't be in another movie - I'm all for a film where Indy passes the torch and tags along as the "old father who still has a few good kicks in him" (like the Sean Connery figure in Last Crusade), but if they're just going to make it a star vehicle to try and revive Ford's fading career, then I have very low hopes for it.